I'm often interested into what goes into changes to committee-driven standards.
To an outsider, proposing a change seems to require one to be part of a shady cabal of Big-5 employees, skilled in the art of hiding subtle, privacy-invading features into inscrutable, plain-text RFCs.
That or subjecting yourself to 30K+ what-abouters who deform your suggestion into something unrecognisable.
It's refreshing to see a straightforward, well-formatted proposal (even if I do slightly prefer the `FROM table1 x JOIN table2 y ON x.fk` syntax suggested in other comments).
To an outsider, proposing a change seems to require one to be part of a shady cabal of Big-5 employees, skilled in the art of hiding subtle, privacy-invading features into inscrutable, plain-text RFCs.
That or subjecting yourself to 30K+ what-abouters who deform your suggestion into something unrecognisable.
It's refreshing to see a straightforward, well-formatted proposal (even if I do slightly prefer the `FROM table1 x JOIN table2 y ON x.fk` syntax suggested in other comments).