In the absence of other evidence, isn't it the case that any given trait is 50% heritable and 50% environmental?
> Decay date: April 3, 5966 (planned) > Iteration itself isn’t inherently bad. It’s just that the objective
> function usually isn’t what we want from a scientific perspective.
I think this is exactly right and touches on a key difference between science and engineering. By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest;
Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the
bitterest. * For better or worse, real customers will stick with the
"original brand".
* The fork won't get any of the community support the
original did, and will always be out of sync.
* Whatever community forms around the original project
will angrily reject the fork.
I don't believe this is always true--usually the superior* fork wins out. Take Firefox or xorg. Both of them effectively replaced the projects from which they came.