HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

lfairy

no profile record

comments

lfairy
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
BTW, this article explains how Rust releases work:

https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/appendix-07-nightly-rust.html

It's a release train, similar to that used by Chromium and Firefox.

Edition releases (e.g. Rust 2021) are reserved for breaking changes only, and to retain Rust's stability promise, are opt-in.
lfairy
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
> By the way the difference is that Rust is not a standard, thus is easier to evolve (the process is much shorter).

Another thing is ABI.

C and C++ are ABI-stable, which means that many historic mistakes (intmax_t, std::regex, polymorphic allocators) are impossible to fix.

Rust only promises source compatibility, not ABI compatibility, so it has a lot more freedom to tweak its design.

https://thephd.dev/binary-banshees-digital-demons-abi-c-c++-...
lfairy
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
I think it's less "passion" and "focus", more his position as the Linux lead giving him first-hand experience with change control at scale. He didn't need a product manager to gather requirements, because he already knew them.

That's basically what ItsMonkk is saying, but I think it's worth making it more explicit. Because a one-in-a-million engineer is not replicable, but a deep understanding of your users' needs is.
lfairy
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
So you're saying that Haskell's memory safety is meaningless too, because parts of its stdlib and runtime are written in C?
lfairy
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
Yeah, Rust is about the simplest language that guarantees both memory safety + low-level control. Almost all of its complexity comes from having to satisfy both.