HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mikmoila

no profile record

comments

mikmoila
·قبل شهرين·discuss
Code contains deviations from assumed behaviour, and some behaviours might manifest themselves as failures. Some failures might be exploitable by attackers.
mikmoila
·قبل شهرين·discuss
Yes, imagine a breakthrough moneymaker product containing generative AI parts; It'll be under legal attacks from day zero...
mikmoila
·قبل شهرين·discuss
OpenJDK project (interim) AI-policy faq (https://openjdk.org/legal/ai):

"What are the intellectual-property risks of using generative AI tools? The Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) requires that a contributor own the intellectual property rights in each contribution and be able to grant those rights to Oracle, without restriction. Most generative AI tools, however, are trained on copyrighted and licensed content, and their output can include content that infringes those copyrights and licenses, so contributing such content would violate the OCA. Whether a user of a generative AI tool has IP rights in content generated by the tool is the subject of active litigation."
mikmoila
·قبل شهرين·discuss
How about intellectual-property risks?
mikmoila
·قبل شهرين·discuss
I don't I use Java for small scripts/tools.
mikmoila
·قبل 6 أشهر·discuss
Are they really? I've been under impression that agentic LLMs are just instances of the LLMs, no "specialized training" involved