There seem to be a lot of comments about civil war or splitting being a solution to the country's woes. If, however, you look at a voting map on a county by county basis, it is startling -- vast majority are red.
The gist of the article is easy to see, but one has yet to address my original questions. To clarify: 1) Why the urgent drumbeat of "vaccine, vaccine, vaccine" when most of the population, especially younger, faces a higher risk of serious side effects from the vaccines? and 2) Why the Pavlovian gnashing of teeth when anyone ask why this tune is the only one getting playtime?
btw, myocarditis, hemi-paralysis, and stroke-like responses are, imo, a little more serious than a rash... you, know, in case you happened to be looking into it for yourself
I appreciate your reasoned response and agree with you. I would add, though, that there seems to be enough evidence that, at least for some people, that the vaccines can cause significant harm. Additionally, for many age cohorts, that risk of harm outweighs the benefits of the vaccine.
There is evidence that the vaccines are not safe, but that is not my question. My question is why the "hard-sell" and blanket rejection of ANY contrary views.
Thank them for their time, decline their offer, and look for a position that is in line with your expectations. Your "future self" will thank you for making this choice.