This is a textbook false dichotomy. We could change the laws around digital privacy to reflect an infinite combination of policies, it is not a choice between two options. The point is that Facebook's position should not be the default policy.
What makes this case particularly exciting to me is that it feels like a step in the direction of bottoms-up protections for citizens, as opposed to top-down regulation of corporations, which I believe is the better path forward.
What makes this case particularly exciting to me is that it feels like a step in the direction of bottoms-up protections for citizens, as opposed to top-down regulation of corporations, which I believe is the better path forward.