HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

pbourke

no profile record

comments

pbourke
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
> Conservatives aren't against rules, they are against changing rules.

That doesn’t ring true to me. Both liberals and conservatives want to change and preserve rules according to their viewpoints.
pbourke
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
> I think the pandemic has far more historical significance

I’m not sure about that. Without 9/11, there would be no wars, perhaps no Obama, etc. It altered the arc of history in a profound way.

The recent Frontline episode “America after 9/11”[0] draws a through-line from 9/11 to the events of Jan 6 at the U.S. Capitol.

[0] https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/america-after-9-11/
pbourke
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
Just chiming in that I absolutely detest this way of thinking. This isn’t a dig at you personally, but against the idea of living or presenting your life as some series of neatly explainable resume bullet points. I have been susceptible to it myself to a greater or lesser degree throughout my career.
pbourke
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
> Corporations value the ability to remove all human agency & decision-making from software development where possible.

Corporations value the ability to continue as an operating entity and make changes to the code after the proponent of Kleisli arrows and lenses has departed for greener pastures.
pbourke
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
> If people want to "invest," they'll figure out more pro-social ways to do it than the stock market

Here are 99% of the things you can invest in as a person without a very large amount of capital:

- real estate (your own home or rental units)

- bonds (another security - same issue as equities in your analysis)

- private business

Are any of those inherently more pro-social than equities?

The stock market encompasses both WSB speculators and “buy and hold forever” investors.