This is great, however the phrasing of the question might lead to a "Tyranny of Structurelessness" [0] issue where they're not asking for a diversity statement, but are expecting the answer to contain a diversity statement.
"The Trudeau government has stopped using the Liberal Party's private database to conduct background checks on candidates for judicial appointments, federal sources say."
This is a specific claim about the Liberals that is not refuted by suppositions about other parties, even if the supposition is likely true.
"The government should solve every problem" is a totalizing idea the Liberals have implemented though.
We see this in the job growth numbers, for example, that show massive federal government hiring and anemic private sector growth. A market solution would have federal incentives create private sector growth to accomplish goals.
And, yes: Canada badly needs some kind of antitrust regime. Perhaps the reward for monopolization of a Canadian market should be nationalization.
Depends what you mean by "win". I suppose it implies "achieved some defined geopolitical goals". Those wars, perhaps, didn't have defined goals -- so what does "win" mean in the context of not having a win condition?
No [0].
Nintendo was incorporated in 1889 [1].
Here is an 1890 Nintendo commercial [2].
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karuta#/media/File:NintendoCar...