It's gradually phased out. Right now it's essentially abandonware. At some point in the future they'll just kill it out of the blue. Things that provide value to advanced users don't matter to most of these "data-based" companies.
So it's no longer a map application, because it's producing weird non-standard projections, tiles that can't be stitched/georeferenced properly etc.
Will Google support and maintain an actual maps application?
Or will they merge google earth and google maps together in an even less capable tool purely for consumers to wow at?
Castrating Google Earth with the webgl version and locking it into Chrome was bad enough. I wish this stops here.
This will be very controversial, especially in HN, but market cap doesn't mean shit.
Apple has roughly $50B in revenue and $120B in equity.
Most of it's products could be replaced in less than 5 years by a competitor. Market cap is a measure of public trust among other things but not actual worth or value to society.
You're downvoted a lot because you didn't substantiate your claim, but I assume many people, myself included, agree with the sentiment.
Up until now Lubuntu had a clear goal: Create a usable Ubuntu-compatible distribution that runs on old hardware.
Now the goals are so vague and subjective that they lead to nowhere. Sure, this won't matter in the short term, but sooner or later the project will get completely derailed because of different interpretations of this dumb statement.
They can still make a good lightweight OS that runs on 10 year old hardware. There's no reason to change the goal.
Sure, it's no longer a massive challenge, but it doesn't have to be. If the developers want to try new things they can fork it.
Now, organizations do change over time, as the people behind them change. But I honestly cannot believe such a retarded move can be justified by the ignorance of management and design. How can such a decision not be turned down immediately? Erasing the iconic Firefox logo? The only brand asset they have?
Is the Mozilla organization infiltrated by saboteurs? I imagine a lot of governments and corporations will be much happier when the last trully free browser dies. Please fire those people.
I'm from a Mediterranean country and it's customary to be 30 min to an hour late to parties. Distant acquintances and people that don't really feel like going will arrive close to 2 hours late. I thought this was the norm in the Western world. Is it not? Do folks in the English-speaking world arrive on the minute?