the implementations have a distinctly "I wrote this at a 3 AM hackathon" vibe
The LLM handles the natural language interaction and orchestration, while the computer algebra system does what it does best ... exact symbolic manipulation.
Wow, incredible. I told myself I’d stop waffling and just buy the next 800gb/s mini or studio to come out, so I guess I’m getting this.
Not sure how much storage to get. I was floating the idea of getting less storage, and hooking it up to a TB5 NAS array of 2.5” SSDs, 10-20tb for models + datasets + my media library would be nice. Any recommendations for the best enclosure for that?
IIRC when I played KSP it was necessary to point slightly down if you wanted to reach orbit in a continuous burn, rather than waiting to burn more at perigee. Is that true in general?
(was playing with a mod that models ullage, so relighting was quite finicky)
No differences were observed between exercising and nonexercising and between placebo and [600mg test-e] treated subjects for any of the 5 subdomains of [Multi-Dimensional Anger Inventory]
Protocols from interfaces and multimethods from overloading. Although, to be honest, I've barely ever used them because FP is so easy in clojure. The few times I have, they make sense.
I can't find the quote for the of me, but it was from Rich Hickey and went something like: "First, you use Clojure to escape Java. Then, you use Clojure to write better Java."
I definitely found it to be true. Clojure takes the good parts of Java's OO system.
The LLM handles the natural language interaction and orchestration, while the computer algebra system does what it does best ... exact symbolic manipulation.
this smells like claude :D