roywiggins

قبل 9 ساعاتdiscuss

Depends. Sometimes it's just biofuels.

roywiggins

قبل 10 أيامdiscuss

Good news, airlines already barely profit:

https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2025-releases/2025-12-09-0...

roywiggins

قبل 10 أيامdiscuss

Even more worrying if it's not deliberate and we are all just naturally writing like that now.

roywiggins

قبل 10 أيامdiscuss

Sometimes that's me. I wish more submissions didn't read like AI. I worry that people can't detect tiresomely LLMy output and upvote it to the front page. I'm not mad or anything, I just find the internet less and less useful, because so much that circulates pings my personal AI detector (running in my skull). Sometimes I just close the tab in frustration but sometimes I comment, because it sucks.

(I don't actually care that much if it is LLM text, I care when something reads like it is, because it means everyone writing blogs using this style sounds like everyone else. it's alienating!)

roywiggins

قبل 10 أيامdiscuss

My problem is that my personal AI detector running on wetware just goes ping and it's hard to articulate why. I agree with the person you're replying to on all points but also, when I think something is AI, it's very much just a little brain ping that I would have to laboriously try to work backwards from.

LLM text often just is missing the cadence of human-written text. It never slows down or speeds up; it keeps a relentless pace. Sure, a human can write like that, and I'm sure people do, but I find it enervating to read, whether it was a human or an AI that wrote it.

roywiggins

قبل 11 يومًاdiscuss

A shame that Pangram flags this as AI.

https://www.pangram.com/history/c0a9cde2-7a5c-4588-83a3-0269...

roywiggins

قبل 11 يومًاdiscuss

ai; dr, unfortunately

roywiggins

قبل 13 يومًاdiscuss

Long sequences of short sentences. Not X, but Y.

And Pangram flags it, too.

https://www.pangram.com/history/126831e1-562f-4e65-9874-5250...

roywiggins

قبل 15 يومًاdiscuss

Weirdly not dissimilar from MUMPS systems.

roywiggins

قبل 22 يومًاdiscuss

ai; dr

roywiggins

قبل 30 يومًاdiscuss

Very likely. I'm just saying, people in the CIA seeing where the tech might be going and hedging their bets is not that unlikely.

roywiggins

قبل 30 يومًاdiscuss

Common side-effect of letting Claude write your landing page.

Apparently it's mostly this:

    // ENCODE — pack(html) → one .hmml (a Uint8Array you store or send)
    //   · lifts every data: image out of the HTML into raw bytes (no base64)
    //   · gzips the HTML/CSS/JS and frames it all as one binary blob

roywiggins

قبل 30 يومًاdiscuss

Well, define "drone warfare"- the CIA and the Pentagon has been operating Predators and friends for a long while.

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

The idea is to expose it as a tool to your LLM agent so it can run calculations on its own initiative.

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

Your rewritten post is far easier for me to read now, fwiw.

LLM output has conditioned in me a near reflex response to just close a tab as soon as I smell LLM-authored text. Like, I'm not mad or anything, I just frequently find most default LLM-voiced text very unpleasant to read so I just don't continue reading.

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

"quietly" seems to be the new one recently

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

If something's a bad tool that misleads people into doing bad work, it would be good to know that.

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

> A simple distributional analysis of every rsync release with bug data. No model. No assumptions. Just placement.

If you want me to read your analysis, you are going to have to make it not read like Claude wrote it. What does "placement" even mean here?

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

Pangram seems to be tuned to avoid false positives most of the time.

roywiggins

الشهر الماضيdiscuss

it can operate at the level of a mere mathematics professor, who everyone knows are barely conscious, basically automatons. wake me up when it's Einstein

comments