This is no specific comment on the article or its contents. But I am getting extremely tired of headlines that follow the "X just Y (and it changes everything you thought you knew about Z)" pattern.
Where's the accountability here? Good luck going after an LLM for writing defamatory blog posts.
If you wanted to make people agree that anonymity on the internet is no longer a right people should enjoy this sort of thing is exactly the way to go about it.
Alternatively, the fact that the very first thing basically everyone who isn't Linus has done with vanilla git is introduce some kind of central authority might suggest that what git was "specifically designed for" is more of an outlier than you want to admit.
Everyone knows Linus invented and "specifically designed" git as a drop-in tool for his existing email-patch-based kernel development workflow, which is not how 99.9% of the rest of the world prefers to operate these days.
The modular linux philosophy is great, but it is quite obviously not the optimal solution to all problems. Some problems are better solved in a non-modular way.
Right, but you know what's even more effective than ads in search? Biased (towards paying customers) information in LLM output.