I understand capitalism as “things can be owned and sold” + “you can profit from investment”.
> it's a single possible pareto equilibrium
I propose that those other equilibriums’ stability depended on at least one of these:
a) small population size&density
b) violent totalitarian enforcement
c) indoctrination in caste system and/or religion
d) no contact with capitalism
> Capitalism is not an expression of human nature
Ownership is very natural for humans (2 year old already declares “it’s mine”).
Finally, capitalism is just one part what makes a society. I bet there are quite significant societal differences between Sweden vs US now vs US 70 years ago.
Strong type system limits things like 1+”1”.
Static type system requires type declarations (“int i”).
Python always had strong dynamic types.