HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

ta7789

no profile record

comments

ta7789
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
Correct. Public infrastructure can (but not usually is) run at a loss for the welfare of the citizens. That's the whole point of public infrastructure. MasterCard and Visa have been complaining for a _long_ time about this issue as it undercuts their profitability.
ta7789
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
Absolutely, the US government has a long tradition of weaponizing US Dollar and SWIFT to cut off countries from global trade. This is a fact that has been happening ever since the petrodollar was invented. Governments all over the world, especially India, have realized this is a big vulnerability and a threat to their country's sovereignty. India, Brazil and several countries across the world have invested in their own infrastructure as they rightly should to keep their economic independence.

For those who don't know India has been on the receiving end of US sanctions for a variety of reasons. While the reasoning behind the sanctions has been long debated, it is plainly obvious from the Indian vantage point that economic independence is very critical for their survival.
ta7789
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
Credit cards work differently in the US compared to the rest of the world. You can just "charge back" the merchant for pretty much any reason.
ta7789
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
People seem to have a general distrust about the Indian government and the UPI system. There are certainly a lot of conspiracy theories floating around.

The plain idea of UPI is that it is publicly funded digital infrastructure. The US has networks such as Mastercard, Visa, etc. These are privately run digital infrastructure that facilitate digital payments. UPI is publicly funded digital infrastructure. AFAIK it is legal for private digital infrastructure such as Visa, MC, etc to exist. However, due to the tax payer funded nature of UPI the fees are way lower than private digital infrastructure can offer. This has been the main criticism against it by the private players.

Let's be clear, governments everywhere build roads using taxes and offers them for "free" to the citizens. That doesn't stop private entities from creating private roads for a fee. However, no private entity tries to build road infrastructure as it is not a profitable business. Thats the same situation with digital payments in India due to UPI's existence. That doesn't mean that private businesses cannot offer their own private payment networks with value added services to compete with UPI.

The mindset in the west is very different than the east which leads to a whole lot of unfounded criticism on here.
ta7789
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
[flagged]