Actually, while Iceland is meaningless, Ireland is meaning more. Don't forget that without Denmark injections, Iceland is just nothing ... If not even less.
Seing Iceland as a country, as a nation, as a state, in a modern way, is a perfect non sense. Iceland is a small territory, between Europe and Groenland with at most 200k people on it. It's not the same as Ireland at all.
In my country, from the time we restricted (well, forbid) personla firearms (around 1940, just before the occupation) up to now, the citizen individual rights haven't stopped to decrease.
Benefited from tax money ? Of course ... Since every films made in France have to be financed by the State ... kind of a censorship bureau ...
And the State takes his part in the success of the film of course.
As of now, the state gained more than Depardieu with him than the opposite.
Depardieu is a great actor and that's why he got rich. And the State had great benefits of having him all these years. For years and years, the French socialist bureaucracy have paid their monarchical lifestyle thanks to guys like Depardieu, who pays millions and millions taxes a year.
The State is not supposed to be a jail where you have to pay the warden by 85% of your revenues.
The French government is doing crap, totally. They are liars, incompetent and raging. Those leftists pretend to ́́"hate the rich", like Hollande said once, "the rich that earn more than 4.000€ a month", he added ... At the time, he himself earned about 20.000€ a month ... Bullshit ... Probably this is the worst government we had since the WWII.
Anyway, J.M Ayrault, our dear prime minister who (like most of his friends) had trouble with justice for favoritism in a case of misappropriation of public goods (almost all of them had troubles for tax fraud as well), had no right to insult publicly the citizen Depardieu like he did who probably offered to France more than all of them altogether.
Depardieu is 1000% right and most of the French people support him there.
I don't live in the USA and I'm interested in that question ... Americans shouldn't leave their socialists restrict their freedom. They do not understand that restricting the right to firearm is a way for the state to take more control. The problem is, maybe you never had any problem, but when you have, most of the time, the state isn't there to protect your ass.
And ... Why not to forbid cars as well? Knives, glasses, alcohol, tobacco, chimneys and so on ...? You totally dumb guys. People are not self-responsible? Learn them to be, rather than resricting privacy to « protect them from themselves » ...
But ... It won't happen. I'm living in a socialist country and I know how you, leftists, are thinking ... You only admit you mistakes when it's way to late. It's a shame.
Mmmh ... What exactly is you point, here? Why « startup », and not « start-up » or « start up » ...? Do you have any etymological argument, here, or is it just a matter of taste and "being special"? Do you really make any sense? I don't think so. Please, don't make people loose more time reading your ineptness.
It's good that we're better at visual design. And we don't judge book with their cover, but the cover could definitely give us a good idea on how the book is minded. The final judgment is when you have read the book.
The same for a website. You can feel totally uncomfortable with a visual design, so there are lot of chances that you won't stay on the site, even if the service is great.
You have to take care of both, that's it.
You never had the right to resell licenses ... only supports.
When you used to buy cassettes, vinyls or CD / DVD, you were buying the support, and licensing for the content (for personal usage, most of the time) at the same time.
The only difference is that the license seemed to be attached to the support (in the same way the "genuine" sticker with the serial is stuck on the Windows boxes), so it was confusing whether the content was licensed to you or to the support.
Actually, it was to you, and you had no rights to sell it. But it was tolerated. Because you had the right to sell the support. But theoretically, the license stayed yours, and the new owner had no rights to use the content of the support he bought.
Now, will probably much more difficult, technically, since you buy the license without any kind of support ... On the other side, if you are careful enough, you can keep it lifelong and if you are clever enough, you can share it with all your relatives and friends lifetime.
This is just the exact opposite of what one should do ... Companies, all companies, a fortiori startups, hate when the see such a mass application file. This a a totally crazy advice. Companies need the applicant to know about them, applicant need to know about the company he is applying for. Guy, you want to drag us to a rotten world.
There is some "climate deniers" ...? Huh, that's really interesting actually. I didn't think one could denied the whole climate.
Anyway, the problem isn't if there is a global warming or not, but if it's normal or not. The earth is warming globally since 200 centuries, after the last glacial maximum. It's a natural process.
Still, 20 years ago, we were afraid by the next, soon, glacial period and the global cooling ... Tons of documentaries tried to afraid people with that.
You know, the first to sponsor Global Warming theories and the IPCC was Margaret Tatcher, when she wanted to convince to vote the budget for a nuclear plant.
It's all about energy and money, that's it. Even geologists must eat. And it's so easy to have a proposal approved if it begins with "the effect on the climate change on [paste anything here]". Easy.
Mmmmh, don't forget he is an old guy ... He wanted to have some good fun but ...
Hope you're right and that it's not gonna be:
"McAfee found dead in his hospital bed in Guatemala"
And menus. And windows, if you consider the fullscreen to be a window. And pointer if you consider icon highlighting to be the affordant equivalent to pointer.