> as the number of messages in the network rises, the quality of those which propagate falls
... if you assume people don`t read the message at all, but use a coin flip to decide if they should reshape it.
I cannot for the life of me fathom how anyone could make a model that completely ignores content quality in respect to distribution and then use that model to make a statement about average quality of content that gets distributed.
This really is the “sperical cow in a vacuum”equivalent of modeling social networks.
Baldurs Gate taught me to love reading. Also English is my second language, and certainly it had a larger part in me reaching A level than anything my teacher ever did.
We already have quantum computers, at this point that’s not new physics it’s engineering.
And if the well established frameworks don’t settle your thirst for understanding quantum mechanics, thats about philosophy not physics.
It sounds like the dilemma might be that facts support not pushing for a repair, but if they go with that they’ll be butchered by the media and the masses.
... if you assume people don`t read the message at all, but use a coin flip to decide if they should reshape it.
I cannot for the life of me fathom how anyone could make a model that completely ignores content quality in respect to distribution and then use that model to make a statement about average quality of content that gets distributed.
This really is the “sperical cow in a vacuum”equivalent of modeling social networks.