Yeah, that's a valid point. I probably could've written a better headline. This tool is more intended for coming up with ideas for writing headlines, social posts etc
Interesting that the article emphasizes making development easier. I've dealt with a lot of low/no-code tools and my experience is that it only really seems to make common use cases easier. Seemingly this would allow developers to focus more on the difficult problems of programming, which inherently isn't easier, but probably makes the job more interesting. Setting up CMS's or building basic CRUD functionality can get old pretty quickly.
I definitely get the point. I often have the urge to use destructuring for saving space, but want to kick myself when revisiting the code a month or two later. I like your rules, thanks for sharing.
Isn't it already illegal to harm people? Not sure why AI is specifically singled out. What about quantum computers, other emerging tech? Seems like a dangerous precedent. Hard for me to believe politicians have the technical competence to police such matters effectively.
I don't see anything beyond anecdotal evidence that supports the claim in the title. Most of the support centers around innovations in the B2C market, but the B2B market is 10x larger, and where I would argue a lot of the innovation is taking place. It seems right now a lot of the bottleneck is on hardware, when we look at something like training NN models. Who knows, maybe once that bottleneck is relieved, the next bottleneck may be human creativity, and who knows what kind of innovations could take place in that kind of environment. Interesting read nonetheless.
There are always plenty of ideas, the hard part is figuring out which ones are worth any of my time. Right now I'm working on a spreadsheet that turns everyday spreadsheet users into programmers. The absurdity of the ambition is not lost on me.
Musk is running two multi-billion dollar companies, simultaneously ushering in sustainable transport/energy, and multi-planetary travel. Each minute of his time may be worth billions in future value. I'll allow it
Definitely like to start with a guide, then manual. I'm not sure I agree with the distinction made between Guides/Education. Guides should definitely educate, but just at a higher level of abstraction.
Ultimately it seems to depend on what Musks true intentions are. Is this some kind of 4D chess move, or is he simply not interested in the company any longer? If it's the latter he likely ends up paying to walk away.