Ask HN: Why does Cloudflare/hCaptcha care so much about buses, boats and trains?
It seems all the hCaptcha verifications I receive are for buses, boats and trains? They don't seem limited by geography or by recency. I'm curious why these particular artifacts and whether this has always been the case.
269 comments
First, I’m going to teach you to fish. Go to hCaptcha’s website, then scroll to the footer. Click around on the about links. It’ll reveal their business model. This trick also works for other businesses and NGOs.
Now, if we look at https://www.hcaptcha.com/labeling we can tell they make money by labeling data sets for a fee. So as a guess, there’s someone out there that needs to improve computer vision detection of transportation vehicles. My guess is it’s a self driving car company, but who knows.
Now, if we look at https://www.hcaptcha.com/labeling we can tell they make money by labeling data sets for a fee. So as a guess, there’s someone out there that needs to improve computer vision detection of transportation vehicles. My guess is it’s a self driving car company, but who knows.
Many a time I receive multiple challenges on a site despite having selected all images perfectly, and can't help but wonder, "Hey, are they getting me to do more work than necessary because they're running behind on their labelling backlog?". There's definitely a conflict of incentives in this case. If you're a website owner, you're better off choosing a different service which doesn't have adverse incentives, otherwise it can affect your site experience. And please don't put captcha on GET requests. Use a CDN if you're unable to handle bot load. And don't even get me started on CDNs that throw captcha.
I've found it isn't about "perfection". It is about selecting the same tiles as an "average" person would. I might stare hard at an image, think that one of the tiles contains a tiny fragment of a traffic light, and select it. That isn't what most other people have already done, so the captcha thinks I'm a bot and gives me tougher and tougher challenges. Ever since I stopped pixel-peeping and started quickly selecting the tiles that obviously had a bus in them, the percentage of time that I've gotten by first try has gone way up.
I wonder if this means self-driving vehicles' detection of important traffic features will be at the level of an irritated and disinterested web user who is trying to just do the minimum work to please an algorithm.
But it will be cheap! - The sound of 1000 business C-levels as your head gets removed by going under a truck.
They probably have some statistics in the background which tells them some form of Trustlevel.
You also need to assume that there are potentially control pictures in it as well.
I think this is a very liable approach.
You also need to assume that there are potentially control pictures in it as well.
I think this is a very liable approach.
I think you meant "viable", not "liable". Given the discussion, your typo is ironically amusing, though.
Yeah, it's not like they will label something a train just because a single person says so. But if you have 10k responses with 95% confidence saying it's a train, it's very likely to be the case.
unless a properly obfusicated bot net has seeded the data set with -everything is a train- responses to the tune of >>10k responses with 95% confidence saying it's a train<<
But GP is describing exactly the opposite: there might be a train that's not immediately visible at a glance, leading most people to not label it.
For unambiguous images almost all humans will label them the same way. For ambiguous ones humans will differ. Presumably they'll accumulate stats on each image and will be able to detect cases like this.
That's about as much attention the average driver pays anyways. I drive a motorcycle, I KNOW that.
I was always tempted to knock on people's driver-side windows when I saw them looking at their phone. Never did - figured they'd probably startle, with a non-zero chance they'd accidentally fling the car into me.
I yell at them. Loudly! Loud enough that people a block away turn to look.
But then, when you're staring at your phone while driving your car out of a parking lot and across the sidewalk where you only miss hitting me (before driving into oncoming traffic!) because I stopped, well you deserve that minor inconvenience of being embarrassed.
But then, when you're staring at your phone while driving your car out of a parking lot and across the sidewalk where you only miss hitting me (before driving into oncoming traffic!) because I stopped, well you deserve that minor inconvenience of being embarrassed.
That's an interesting idea - maybe it would be smart to have captcha's do a "Point out all the motorcycles" or "Click all the pedestrians" setup.
I love a rant on this one...
Sometimes the bus/boat/truck has motorbikes sometimes bicycles. Is that a petrol-powered bicycle, or a motorbike to the [USAmerican?] person who wrote the rules!? Are all large yellow vehicles buses in USA or do you have minibuses, oh wait, are minibuses buses.
I've worked out fire engines are trucks for captchas, not sure about Transit-type vehicles, lorries are trucks apparently but goods trucks on railways are not trucks!
Is a traffic light only the lens/led array or the black light-holder too? Do pedestrian lights count as traffic lights? Are those weird lights hanging in the middle of junctions 'traffic lights'.
Wish they'd just tell you what counts.
I have noticed that times I realise after clicking that I missed a square they tend to go through whilst many times I get repeated captchas when I know I got it right. Success, as a user, seems impossible to predict.
Sometimes the bus/boat/truck has motorbikes sometimes bicycles. Is that a petrol-powered bicycle, or a motorbike to the [USAmerican?] person who wrote the rules!? Are all large yellow vehicles buses in USA or do you have minibuses, oh wait, are minibuses buses.
I've worked out fire engines are trucks for captchas, not sure about Transit-type vehicles, lorries are trucks apparently but goods trucks on railways are not trucks!
Is a traffic light only the lens/led array or the black light-holder too? Do pedestrian lights count as traffic lights? Are those weird lights hanging in the middle of junctions 'traffic lights'.
Wish they'd just tell you what counts.
I have noticed that times I realise after clicking that I missed a square they tend to go through whilst many times I get repeated captchas when I know I got it right. Success, as a user, seems impossible to predict.
> lorries are trucks apparently but goods trucks on railways are not trucks!
In the US, lorry == truck. Never heard the term goods truck before today, but I think it's what we call a boxcar.
In the US, lorry == truck. Never heard the term goods truck before today, but I think it's what we call a boxcar.
A "truck" on a railway car is apparently a "bogie" in the UK.
A bogie in India seems to be a railway car in the US.
Then there are intermodal containers, smaller than boxcars, I think they are hauled by truck (lorry) after being unloaded from a flatcar.
A bogie in India seems to be a railway car in the US.
Then there are intermodal containers, smaller than boxcars, I think they are hauled by truck (lorry) after being unloaded from a flatcar.
> flatcar
AKA "flatbed" or "flatbed trailer" :-)
AKA "flatbed" or "flatbed trailer" :-)
I'd rather that than a computer hemming and hawing over whether a single pixel is an oncoming truck and not turning just in case.
a computer "hemming and hawing" as that one accident where it couldn't decide if it was a bicycle or a person has nothing to do with the training. It's what the developers decided to do with input that had a low confidence score. There will ALWAYS be low-confidence ratings on real world data regardless of how good your training is.
Instead of saying "oh crap there's SOMETHING there we should stop" they said "huh, no let's loop on testing it until we figure it out or run it over....whichever comes first."
Instead of saying "oh crap there's SOMETHING there we should stop" they said "huh, no let's loop on testing it until we figure it out or run it over....whichever comes first."
Also if the car wants to stop too much because of low confidence, just turn the brakes off.
Even if you're right, I doubt it's going to be much worse than the level of the average irritated driver.
[deleted]
I kinda go the other way -- could a FFT heuristic mistake this feature for a crosswalk? Then I'll select it, whether or not it's actually crosswalk. Most of the time, this works. It's a stick in the eye of our prenatal robot overlord.
Replying to an_ko's sibling comment:just like the data behind youtube music recommendations, populated by data carefully analysed from legions of bored toddler clicks vs. Spotify's obsessive teenager music curation
Same experience. Once I observed that most (about 9/10) times there are only 3 tiles to select, I stopped looking for a 4th and selected only the 3 most obvious.
I've noticed similar. Often with stop lights, where a tiny sliver of one does not neatly fit in the frame, spilling over ever so slightly to the next square which has no stop light otherwise. There's a none too subtle irony in that one is being punished for accuracy when the context is ultimately public safety.
This. Captcha wants me to choose crosswalks and you can see there’s that sliver of a crosswalk in a few pixels off in another tile. You’re not wrong! But you’re not right. Regression to the mean.
A hexagon would be better as a frame instead of a square.
A hexagon would be better as a frame instead of a square.
So take the image, shift it by a fraction of a tile, and rerun.
Google is _the worst_ for that. At least hCaptcha is a bit less culturally specific.
Every time Google blocks me for refusing to label a motorbike as a "bicycle" I get utterly pissed off. And likewise with the traffic lights on the californian skies. Are the traffic lights the actual lights themselves, or the boom holding them up?
I'm not a human very often, according to Google. hCaptcha tends to let me in...
Every time Google blocks me for refusing to label a motorbike as a "bicycle" I get utterly pissed off. And likewise with the traffic lights on the californian skies. Are the traffic lights the actual lights themselves, or the boom holding them up?
I'm not a human very often, according to Google. hCaptcha tends to let me in...
That same case happened to me! Another example is Parking Meters, they don't exist in my country and I'd never seen them before.
I recently failed a google-bicycle captcha.. "you can't fool me, that's a motorcycle not a bicycle!" I thought.. and then had to complete 2 more challenges. Including a cross walk one where one of the images was just asphalt and painted lines (no context/edges so it could be a parking lot, and airstrip,a highway, an intersection, or a cross-walk).
They also claim that Tigers are not "Cats".
"Please select all the Cats" then shows picture of a tiger among the common House Cats.
"Please select all the Cats" then shows picture of a tiger among the common House Cats.
> Google is _the worst_ for that. At least hCaptcha is a bit less culturally specific.
One example I keep ranting about: I think countries outside the US have different terms for "crosswalks".
I personally know them as "zebra crossings", and it took a while for the reCaptcha request to click in my mind.
One example I keep ranting about: I think countries outside the US have different terms for "crosswalks".
I personally know them as "zebra crossings", and it took a while for the reCaptcha request to click in my mind.
Pedestrian crossings here. I'd also not heard the term "crosswalk" until reCaptcha. Yet another bullshit Americanisation infecting the worlds culture.
I'm not a human very often, according to Google
If Google says you're a robot, it must be true! You should behave accordingly.
There's actually a comic strip in the newspaper going through this storyline right now. Brewster Rockit: Space Guy! was told by a CAPTCHA that he's a robot, so he's going through life that way. The other robots do not seem to be happy to have him as part of their culture.
http://www.brewsterrockit.com
If Google says you're a robot, it must be true! You should behave accordingly.
There's actually a comic strip in the newspaper going through this storyline right now. Brewster Rockit: Space Guy! was told by a CAPTCHA that he's a robot, so he's going through life that way. The other robots do not seem to be happy to have him as part of their culture.
http://www.brewsterrockit.com
I disagree, Google captchas in my experience are much quicker compared to hcaptcha
When cloudflare switched to hcaptcha I definitely noticed it.
When cloudflare switched to hcaptcha I definitely noticed it.
Sorry, but Google captcha is specifically designed to annoy real people in some cases. They literally implemented slow fade-in / fade-out for images. This does absolutely nothing against actual bots, but annoying as hell for a real person.
Literally any other captcha is better than this.
Literally any other captcha is better than this.
I thought the fade thing was specifically to trip up bots. Like bots know what the picture is long before it is shown to the user, so if the bot clicks on it then the CAPCHA knows something is up.
Which is solved exactly after this is encountered the first time, eg
if opacity -ne 100% do_not_click_yet = true
So this is totally useless to prevent bots from solving it.
if opacity -ne 100% do_not_click_yet = true
So this is totally useless to prevent bots from solving it.
Surely then they look at timing, people will click anywhere from, let's say 50% opacity, but bots always wait?
Easy for a bot to fake that with a random number generator. If nothing else bot authors can collect their own statistics. I understand the bots have an army of people in the background for images they don't understand yet, just collect timing data from that set and have your random number generator emulate that timing data. (I'm guessing a bell curve)
Actually having army of people it's exactly how complex recaptha's are bypassed. It's less than $1 for 1000 captcha:
https://anti-captcha.com/
There of course options with image recognition, but they're less reliable.
https://anti-captcha.com/
There of course options with image recognition, but they're less reliable.
Honestly, that service looks like something I'm almost tempted to pay for myself. $1 per 1000 recaptchas is a lot cheaper than how I value my time, at the very least. It's not like google couldn't pay people to do these ML training datasets; I resent giving them free labour.
Unfortunately I doubt that "recaptcha solver" can be built as browser extension. Most of advanced bots for parsing automation built on proprietary platforms like ZennoPoster and they basically heavily modify Firefox / Chromium.
Also latency of human-recognition service is quite high so while you wouldn't need to solve it you'll need to wait for number of seconds anyway.
Also latency of human-recognition service is quite high so while you wouldn't need to solve it you'll need to wait for number of seconds anyway.
Do you seriously think that people who programm the bots incapable of taking it into account?
Bypass for this fading was obviously implementrd next day this first appear on reCaptcha.
Bypass for this fading was obviously implementrd next day this first appear on reCaptcha.
Isn't it more for rate limiting?
You dont need fade-in / fade-out effects for rate limiting.
Bots are obviously get to see images instantly once they're returned by the server as they dont need to wait for fade-in to complete. Because bots API is injected into browser internals instead.
If rate limiting is needed there is always CloudFlare way where you're literally show user "wait" and refresh page a bit later. This is annoying, but nowhere as much as reCaptcha fading is.
If rate limiting is needed there is always CloudFlare way where you're literally show user "wait" and refresh page a bit later. This is annoying, but nowhere as much as reCaptcha fading is.
[deleted]
people tend to have very different experiences with google captchas based on how normal they are. if you block everything and try to anonymize your browsing as much as possible and otherwise do everything you can to look like a bot, you're going to get a very difficult captcha to somebody with all their browser settings on default.
Yeah I do my routine browsing in private mode, no 3rd party cookies, no history, and an ad blocker. I get captchas everwhere.
Yup. This reminds me of the ‘introduction’ of an old hacker simulation game from 2004 that was quite prescient.
“ In the year 2012, the corporations of the world paved over the Internet, designing their own network system. Keeping the same name, they developed a system where every piece of information was audited and paid for before it was passed on to the world at large. Those who still followed the ideology of an open and uncontrolled Internet gathered what resources they could and formed the SwitchNet. Build mostly out of discarded technologies and backdoors in the current Internet, it allowed some manner of uncontrolled communication around the world. The "Hacker Outpost" is in need of new recruits to perform missions in information gathering against the corporations, which will allow them to increase the presence of the SwitchNet in the world.”
And the slightly different press release one: “ In 2012, a new Internet was introduced--one that prohibited users from posting anything on personal home pages, prohibited them from using software of their choice, and from having an e-mail address. Having no place to stay, hackers created the SwitchNet, an underground network operating on the old wires and infrastructure of the original Internet”
“ In the year 2012, the corporations of the world paved over the Internet, designing their own network system. Keeping the same name, they developed a system where every piece of information was audited and paid for before it was passed on to the world at large. Those who still followed the ideology of an open and uncontrolled Internet gathered what resources they could and formed the SwitchNet. Build mostly out of discarded technologies and backdoors in the current Internet, it allowed some manner of uncontrolled communication around the world. The "Hacker Outpost" is in need of new recruits to perform missions in information gathering against the corporations, which will allow them to increase the presence of the SwitchNet in the world.”
And the slightly different press release one: “ In 2012, a new Internet was introduced--one that prohibited users from posting anything on personal home pages, prohibited them from using software of their choice, and from having an e-mail address. Having no place to stay, hackers created the SwitchNet, an underground network operating on the old wires and infrastructure of the original Internet”
Googles own captchas are Satan. Squiggly lines all over the place. Why they don't use the normally accepted captcha is beyond me
> I'm not a human very often, according to Google.
"On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog." (Well, except Google, it seems.)
"On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog." (Well, except Google, it seems.)
rosndo(2)
I've noticed that some sites deliberately do this or have lousy code that fails to properly acknowledge captcha completions.
Take archive.is/archive.fo/archive.today, for example. If you're using Cloudflare DNS (1.1.1.1) or iCloud Private Relay, and you visit https://archive.is/, you'll get what looks like a Cloudflare screening page. It's not, though: that page is part of archive.is and is served to Cloudflare DNS users (which includes iCloud Private Relay users)--the use of reCAPTCHA in place of hCaptcha is a giveaway. You can complete the captcha as many times as you like, but you'll never get in.
And how many times have we completed a captcha on a form only to have it throw another captcha in our face without so much as an error message? Sometimes it's just lousy code.
Take archive.is/archive.fo/archive.today, for example. If you're using Cloudflare DNS (1.1.1.1) or iCloud Private Relay, and you visit https://archive.is/, you'll get what looks like a Cloudflare screening page. It's not, though: that page is part of archive.is and is served to Cloudflare DNS users (which includes iCloud Private Relay users)--the use of reCAPTCHA in place of hCaptcha is a giveaway. You can complete the captcha as many times as you like, but you'll never get in.
And how many times have we completed a captcha on a form only to have it throw another captcha in our face without so much as an error message? Sometimes it's just lousy code.
I remember reading the CF founders about how archive.is didn't want cloudflare dns users to resolve to archive, so they respect that.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28495204
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28495204
There's also a mode where it thinks you are a bot/sucker and gives you unlimited images until you give up. That's always fun.
>where it thinks you are a bot/sucker and gives you unlimited images until you give up.
I frequently get these from Cloudflare when using Tor Browser. Google is basically unusable with Tor Browser.
I frequently get these from Cloudflare when using Tor Browser. Google is basically unusable with Tor Browser.
[deleted]
If anyone wants to see that, try launching the browser via Selenium. I used to do that to partially automate some activities, such as download bank statements. I'd have my Selenium using script open a browser and go to the bank, then wait for me to login and get to the account page.
I'd login, dismiss any popup or interstitial promotions the bank decided to give me, get to the account page, and tell my script to continue.
My script would then use Selenium to click the download button, click the "custom date range" radio button on download popup, fill in the range fields to cover the last 60 days, pick OFX for the download format, and start the download, prompting me to let it know when the download is finished.
When the download finished, I could then go to one of my other accounts at that bank, tell the script I'm there, and that one gets downloaded, and so on.
My bank isn't giving CAPTCHAs so that would still work if I were to get around to updating my script to deal with some redesigns they did of their pages which broke finding the relevant elements on the page.
But I've found that if I do visit a site that uses hCaptcha while using the Selenium launched browser, it seems to get stuck. Click to tell it I'm not a bot. Then get an image test. Answer that correctly and get another image test. Answer that correctly. Then it goes back to the click if you are not a bot thing, and repeats--two more image tests and back to the beginning.
Here's a program if anyone wants to try this and has the Selenium Webdriver package for Python3 installed. This will open a browser and take you to fanfiction.net. Trying to actually read any story will bring up the CAPTCHA.
It used to be that if you added
There's this project to provide a Selenium Chrome driver that is supposed to not trigger anti-bot detectors [1], but it still hit the CAPTCHA loop when I tried it.
[1] https://github.com/ultrafunkamsterdam/undetected-chromedrive...
I'd login, dismiss any popup or interstitial promotions the bank decided to give me, get to the account page, and tell my script to continue.
My script would then use Selenium to click the download button, click the "custom date range" radio button on download popup, fill in the range fields to cover the last 60 days, pick OFX for the download format, and start the download, prompting me to let it know when the download is finished.
When the download finished, I could then go to one of my other accounts at that bank, tell the script I'm there, and that one gets downloaded, and so on.
My bank isn't giving CAPTCHAs so that would still work if I were to get around to updating my script to deal with some redesigns they did of their pages which broke finding the relevant elements on the page.
But I've found that if I do visit a site that uses hCaptcha while using the Selenium launched browser, it seems to get stuck. Click to tell it I'm not a bot. Then get an image test. Answer that correctly and get another image test. Answer that correctly. Then it goes back to the click if you are not a bot thing, and repeats--two more image tests and back to the beginning.
Here's a program if anyone wants to try this and has the Selenium Webdriver package for Python3 installed. This will open a browser and take you to fanfiction.net. Trying to actually read any story will bring up the CAPTCHA.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from selenium.webdriver import Chrome
driver = Chrome()
driver.get("https://www.fanfiction.net")
input("press enter when done")
driver.close()
driver.quit()
It used to be that if you added
from selenium.webdriver import ChromeOptions
options = ChromeOptions()
options.add_experimental_option("excludeSwitches", ["enable-automation"])
options.add_experimental_option('useAutomationExtension', False)
options.add_argument("--disable-blink-features=AutomationControlled")
driver = Chrome(options=options)
There's this project to provide a Selenium Chrome driver that is supposed to not trigger anti-bot detectors [1], but it still hit the CAPTCHA loop when I tried it.
[1] https://github.com/ultrafunkamsterdam/undetected-chromedrive...
fanfiction.net has also simply broken the Calibre FanFicFare integration thanks to their CloudFlare shenanigans.
The workaround is to simply visit all chapters separately and then point Calibre at the Google Chrome cache folder.
So nice going there, fanfiction.net. Instead of offering a 1-click .epub download like AO3 (which is completely CDN-able with a very long TTL), you now had to serve 50 individual requests. Great engineering work there.
(Obviously they do this to serve ads on every request)
The workaround is to simply visit all chapters separately and then point Calibre at the Google Chrome cache folder.
So nice going there, fanfiction.net. Instead of offering a 1-click .epub download like AO3 (which is completely CDN-able with a very long TTL), you now had to serve 50 individual requests. Great engineering work there.
(Obviously they do this to serve ads on every request)
I would really like to see a fan fiction site that combined AO3's ease of downloading with Fanfiction.net's organization.
AO3 is OSS and vastly understaffed. Having worked on some of their tickets, IMO they could use 20 contributors working part-time for a year or two to stabilize it until the idea of useful new features becomes viable.
I strongly encourage anyone with Rails experience to contribute [0]. There is a giant test suite which definitely helps with stability. The ticket time-to-resolve is simply quite slow due to the above-mentioned understaffing, so don't be discouraged!
[0] https://github.com/otwcode/otwarchive/
I strongly encourage anyone with Rails experience to contribute [0]. There is a giant test suite which definitely helps with stability. The ticket time-to-resolve is simply quite slow due to the above-mentioned understaffing, so don't be discouraged!
[0] https://github.com/otwcode/otwarchive/
Yeah there’s lots of detect and anti detect stuff going back and forth. It’s pretty silly and frustrating for situations like yours. Doing things for yourself to speed up mundane life things.
There’s so many anti-detect libraries on GitHub these days. Wonder how many work well.
There’s so many anti-detect libraries on GitHub these days. Wonder how many work well.
I believe this is done to get answers for unsolved captchas. For example, I have a million photos of streets filled with cars, buses, motorcycles, streetlights, and crosswalks I want to add to my captcha database. I don't want to categorize them all myself, and I want the answers to be what the average person will identify, not what I or a machine will identify.
So, I send everyone two captchas. One has a known answer and is required to be correct to access the service. The second captcha answer isn't yet known, so it doesn't matter what the user selects. However, when they get the known answer right, we log their answer for the unknown captcha. Once we get a large enough sample, we then have our top answers for the unknown captcha and can start using it for verification.
So, I send everyone two captchas. One has a known answer and is required to be correct to access the service. The second captcha answer isn't yet known, so it doesn't matter what the user selects. However, when they get the known answer right, we log their answer for the unknown captcha. Once we get a large enough sample, we then have our top answers for the unknown captcha and can start using it for verification.
I always assumed that's how it works so would do the first correctly and random clicks for the second. This is as I was uninterested though doubt it is still that simple.
I wonder, what are the minimum number of labels per image to ensure clean data?
I wonder, what are the minimum number of labels per image to ensure clean data?
I have found many times that if select an incorrect tile and then unselect it before submitting, I am not presented with multiple challenges. My guess is a bot would not exhibit this behavior.
Try it out next time.
Try it out next time.
Not anymore.
Usually in those cases, even if you make mistakes they get accepted. The larger the clicks, the less annotated / voted those images are, thus less severe their penalization method for wrong markings. I have observed sites that newly introduce such captcha basically accept if I just click 1/3rd of the right answers. Don't click the wrong answers as they are fully/partially introduced on purpose. It's just that you don't have to click all right answers.
Whoever made this new captcha I’m seeing starting to see everywhere:
https://imgur.com/a/hoyjctl
Thank you! itsso much easier than being a labeling bot for self driving cars.
https://imgur.com/a/hoyjctl
Thank you! itsso much easier than being a labeling bot for self driving cars.
That looks pretty easy for machines. I wouldn’t be surprised if CLIP could solve that out of the box. (Then again, I guess the same applies to “select all the traffic lights”)
yeah you won't be loving this one where they make you do 10 in a row and if you get one wrong you start again with 11 this time. also it'll fail you at random
When they start doing captchas along the lines of "check all pictures of potential terrorists" we'll know they're training data sets for military drone manufacturers.
They already are https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/07/google-ai...
It'd be nice if the military actually cared enough about drone targets to even attempt this...
That wouldn't work well. I was in Texas during 9/11 and they were firebombing all the hispanic people's cars because the locals don't really have a good eye for different ethnicities. Its pretty much black/white/terrorist and hasn't improved all that much in the time since.
Austin has grown a lot since I lived there are a lot of people from outside Texas have moved there so I'm sure the culture has changed - but when I was there going from north Austin to south Austin seemed to be this epic trip the locals would only do on a weekend -- and probably pack water and sandwiches for the drive across town. A really exotic senior trip "abroad" for students might be to Houston or Galveston. You probably met your future spouse in grade school. Not very worldly.
Austin has grown a lot since I lived there are a lot of people from outside Texas have moved there so I'm sure the culture has changed - but when I was there going from north Austin to south Austin seemed to be this epic trip the locals would only do on a weekend -- and probably pack water and sandwiches for the drive across town. A really exotic senior trip "abroad" for students might be to Houston or Galveston. You probably met your future spouse in grade school. Not very worldly.
This sounds nothing like my experience living in Austin 2009-2017. In fact, this is unrecognizable.
> they were firebombing all the hispanic people's cars
Weird. This is sort of unbelievable. I think I know many Hispanics who lived in ATX during 2001, but they’ve never mentioned their car being firebombed.
> they were firebombing all the hispanic people's cars
Weird. This is sort of unbelievable. I think I know many Hispanics who lived in ATX during 2001, but they’ve never mentioned their car being firebombed.
The only part of that story that sounds plausible was:
>>You probably met your future spouse in grade school. Not very worldly.
>>You probably met your future spouse in grade school. Not very worldly.
That sounds nice though.
Not sure how serious you are, but on the chance you are...
The meeting spouse in grade school/not worldly typically implies not leaving the area they grew up in at any point. I grew up in a smallish town where this happens frequently. So many people never leave the state let alone the country. Some people never even left the county. Their biggest travel is for school sporting events.
In otherwords, it's not really a term of endearment as much as another "bless your heart"
The meeting spouse in grade school/not worldly typically implies not leaving the area they grew up in at any point. I grew up in a smallish town where this happens frequently. So many people never leave the state let alone the country. Some people never even left the county. Their biggest travel is for school sporting events.
In otherwords, it's not really a term of endearment as much as another "bless your heart"
I still think it sounds nice.
Is the place you grew up intrinsically so much worse than the rest of the world? Would it be so bad to be invested in a single community for a lifetime, and to have a deep connection to the people there? I feel like I lack that, deep connections where the pull of cultural influence goes both ways. I'm not convinced that the cosmopolitan breadth of experience we may have gained outweighs the deep experience of locality that we sacrificed to get it.
Is the place you grew up intrinsically so much worse than the rest of the world? Would it be so bad to be invested in a single community for a lifetime, and to have a deep connection to the people there? I feel like I lack that, deep connections where the pull of cultural influence goes both ways. I'm not convinced that the cosmopolitan breadth of experience we may have gained outweighs the deep experience of locality that we sacrificed to get it.
> Is the place you grew up intrinsically so much worse than the rest of the world?
For many people, the answer is a pretty definitive yes. I grew up in apartheid South Africa and left mainly to escape two years of compulsory military service helping enforce apartheid rule.
But if you speak to immigrants in any first world country, you'll find lots of similar stories. People having migrated because of severe political or economic issues.
> I'm not convinced that the cosmopolitan breadth of experience we may have gained outweighs the deep experience of locality that we sacrificed to get it.
What stops you going back, in that case?
For many people, the answer is a pretty definitive yes. I grew up in apartheid South Africa and left mainly to escape two years of compulsory military service helping enforce apartheid rule.
But if you speak to immigrants in any first world country, you'll find lots of similar stories. People having migrated because of severe political or economic issues.
> I'm not convinced that the cosmopolitan breadth of experience we may have gained outweighs the deep experience of locality that we sacrificed to get it.
What stops you going back, in that case?
I'm sure you realize that going back doesn't take away the years of wandering. You've moved on — in my case, I've spent almost thirty years in different communities, marrying a wife from far away with her own family and community, moving several times, making new friends and losing touch with old ones — and, possibly more importantly, the community I grew up in has moved on as well. You know how Heraclitus said, "No man ever steps in the same river twice?" The community you grow up in is like that; to remain in the same community, you have to stay in it, be carried along with it, and change with it, or when you return, you return to a community changed in ways you have not experienced.
I grew up in a smallish town where this happens frequently. So many people never leave the state let alone the country
So, you're extrapolating your personal experiences and applying them to everyone on the planet.
Many of my family members met their spouses in their home town. They hardly ever leave that town. They might fly to another country for vacation once a decade, but otherwise find complete fulfillment in the place where they live. Several have never even bothered to get a drivers' license, because they never found the need to have one.
By your standard, that makes them unsophisticated. But they're probably not. They live in New York City.
So, you're extrapolating your personal experiences and applying them to everyone on the planet.
Many of my family members met their spouses in their home town. They hardly ever leave that town. They might fly to another country for vacation once a decade, but otherwise find complete fulfillment in the place where they live. Several have never even bothered to get a drivers' license, because they never found the need to have one.
By your standard, that makes them unsophisticated. But they're probably not. They live in New York City.
I doubt it. Doesn't match up at all with my experience in Dallas in 2001...
Indians or Middle Easterners I knew were not infrequently misidentified as Mexican (as was anyone of Hispanic but not Mexican background), but the idea that anyone would be so unfamiliar with the sizable Hispanic population to do a "black/white/terrorist" identification and firebomb "all the Hispanic people's cars" is hard to believe without some news articles discussing this as a big trend in 2001 Austin.
Indians or Middle Easterners I knew were not infrequently misidentified as Mexican (as was anyone of Hispanic but not Mexican background), but the idea that anyone would be so unfamiliar with the sizable Hispanic population to do a "black/white/terrorist" identification and firebomb "all the Hispanic people's cars" is hard to believe without some news articles discussing this as a big trend in 2001 Austin.
> "I was in Texas during 9/11 and they were firebombing all the hispanic people's cars"
That's odd, I was living in rural TX when 9/11 and don't recall anything happening like that. And more than half of my coworkers were Hispanic. I remember a few people attacking Sikhs or other vaguely-Asian convenience store owners, not Latinos.
> "Its pretty much black/white/terrorist and hasn't improved all that much in the time since" I suspect your experience wasn't very representative. After all, Texas has a 40% Hispanic population. Assholes won't be calling them terrorists, they're much more likely to be working them like slaves and paying them scraps off the books.
I suspect the biggest reason for a cross-Austin trip being an event has stayed the same: terrible traffic.
> "Its pretty much black/white/terrorist and hasn't improved all that much in the time since" I suspect your experience wasn't very representative. After all, Texas has a 40% Hispanic population. Assholes won't be calling them terrorists, they're much more likely to be working them like slaves and paying them scraps off the books.
I suspect the biggest reason for a cross-Austin trip being an event has stayed the same: terrible traffic.
[deleted]
[deleted]
This became obvious to me when during some period the regular crosswalks, stop lights, and buses got replaced by chimneys, trees, and mountains (!). It was right around the time when some big companies started advertising AI driven quadcopter services.
Ah, so that's what that's about. Here I was wondering why on earth a self-driving car would need help identifying a mountain (or need to identify one at all). "Surely they can't be that bad at avoiding obstacles," I thought.
https://www.hcaptcha.com/labeling
> hCaptcha has one of the largest pools on the planet available for your use. Whatever your scale, we can handle it without expensive upfront commitments. Millions of tasks per day are no problem.
Thanks for pointing this out - I feel abused now.
> hCaptcha has one of the largest pools on the planet available for your use. Whatever your scale, we can handle it without expensive upfront commitments. Millions of tasks per day are no problem.
Thanks for pointing this out - I feel abused now.
Makes sense since other than the ones mentioned I received a lot of crosswalks, traffic lights and bicycles.
It's odd that it never asks for pedestrians.
For the most part, human detection capabilities of modern NNs are very good. This would include detections from a variety of camera angles and resolutions. There are already a lot of labeled training sets available with people in various poses, heights, clothing types, etc.
Bicycle detection is probably one of the more challenging elements as it relates to pedestrians and things you don't want a SD car to run into. Depending on the angle and color of the bicycle, rider position, and background elements, it can be challenging to discern the rider from the bicycle reliably. For the most part, just knowing there is a human present is a good start, but being able to anticipate movement speeds and directions of pedestrians vs. bikers is helpful in anticipating collision paths and distances, and also figuring out distances and terrain (person on bike is slightly elevated above ground, which can cause range perception issues, among other things).
source: have been working in AI/MV space for security/safety applications for 12+ years.
Bicycle detection is probably one of the more challenging elements as it relates to pedestrians and things you don't want a SD car to run into. Depending on the angle and color of the bicycle, rider position, and background elements, it can be challenging to discern the rider from the bicycle reliably. For the most part, just knowing there is a human present is a good start, but being able to anticipate movement speeds and directions of pedestrians vs. bikers is helpful in anticipating collision paths and distances, and also figuring out distances and terrain (person on bike is slightly elevated above ground, which can cause range perception issues, among other things).
source: have been working in AI/MV space for security/safety applications for 12+ years.
> For the most part, human detection capabilities of modern NNs are very good.
If you're white
> There are already a lot of labeled training sets available with people in various poses, heights, clothing types, etc
But not of various skin colors...
If you're white
> There are already a lot of labeled training sets available with people in various poses, heights, clothing types, etc
But not of various skin colors...
I recall some controversy a couple years ago over suspicions that defense contractors were using them to train weapons systems. A few people got captchas asking them to identify helicopters.
I'd love to identify helicopters. I do get planes now, but was it specifically military helicopters?
I like getting to identify basic things like cars, airplanes and trains with hCaptcha. It's like a picture book for adults, and feels strangely pleasant compared to other captchas.
I like getting to identify basic things like cars, airplanes and trains with hCaptcha. It's like a picture book for adults, and feels strangely pleasant compared to other captchas.
Yeah, they were military helicopters:
https://old.reddit.com/r/google/comments/5udzy4/hey_google_e...
https://old.reddit.com/r/google/comments/5udzy4/hey_google_e...
There might be some privacy issues involved there.
A helicopter pilot is lost, lands his helicopter next to you, and asks, "where am I?" to which you respond, "you're in a helicopter". You are correct in the strictest sense, but probably not answering the intent of the question. :)
In this case, the intent is probably something like why are hcaptcha's customers centered around transport when there are so many other applications for this kind of labeling?
In this case, the intent is probably something like why are hcaptcha's customers centered around transport when there are so many other applications for this kind of labeling?
You just gave me the idea to start a captcha service designed for datasets relevant for the prolitariet. Not sure how viable it is (what kind of data would be useful for the prols in a revolution) but it was a fun thought experiment.
[deleted]
Yes but if you make a mistake the capcha fails, hence they are already labeled.
captchas mix classified and unclassified data.
Only if you get the classified data correct a users data is used to classify the unclassified data.
Also the same picture is shown to multiple people to improve confidence.
One of my hobbies is figuring out which captcha prompts are the unclassified data so that I can answer wrong and stick it to the man.
I do the exact same thing, randomly mixing right and wrong snippets. As a result I sometimes go through like 3 or 4 sets, but eventually it lets me in.
Everyone join us !
Everyone join us !
I’m going to blame you when my self driving car crashes
If the manufacturer of self-driving cars decides to save money and depend on low-quality data, they should be blamed, not a random dude on the internet trying to send a form or visit a page.
yes. the blame shifting seems to be a very skewed thing here. then again, this is a tech forum, so of course it would lean that way. stupid users vs bad tech, so let's just blame stupid users.
We used to get Googlers huffing and puffing at the mere suggestion of feeding "wrong" data to their data collection machinery here at HN. Lots of people here put themselves in the shoes of the company making a buck out of your data, if not being in them right now, before the user.
> We used to get Googlers huffing and puffing at the mere suggestion of feeding "wrong" data to their data collection machinery here at HN.
Yeah, it always seems funny to me. I'm using AdNauseam and other techniques for the same reasons they feel I shouldn't be doing it.
Yeah, it always seems funny to me. I'm using AdNauseam and other techniques for the same reasons they feel I shouldn't be doing it.
Is one of your others writing XKCD alt text? This reads just like it :')
How does one determine classified vs unclassified?
How do you do so?
I just try to get one randomly wrong. It almost always lets me through. Also, I'll pick the wrong one that almost looks right. Say, a picture with a vaguely traffic light shaped mailbox or a train shaped car or something. :)
I have noticed there's a very very low correlation between how hard I try on captchas and how quickly they let me through. I just quickly mash a bunch of tiles to start, maybe trying to be in the right general area. That works surprisingly often and when it doesn't I, and pay closer attention to what I'm selecting, then I pretty much always get through on that next try.
This approach mostly fixes the annoying phenomenon where I carefully select the exact right tiles only to be told, "too bad, try again".
This approach mostly fixes the annoying phenomenon where I carefully select the exact right tiles only to be told, "too bad, try again".
The first version of reCAPTCHA made it very obvious as to which word was the classified one and which was the unclassified one, so people had a pretty easy way to inject bad data into the process.
Yeah, I remember my days on 4chan where people kept posting a campaign to substitute a racial slur for the one that looked unclassified.
Some are already labelled, the user doesn't know so it's in their interest to solve the captcha properly and provide good data.
I would guess they have a system such that after a user has passed N captchas successfully, they trust its a human and start displaying them (a portion of) unlabelled captchas that will always succeed and that's when novel labelling happens.
Or something along those lines. And then you can get creative displaying same captcha to multiple users, etc...
Or something along those lines. And then you can get creative displaying same captcha to multiple users, etc...
I wonder if there is a way to pollute the data. Since I always click the captchas correctly, what happens if someone just randomly clicks stuffs? Is he/she banned from the website?
Glad you asked. Since i despise the horrible UX of these Captcha where i get exploited to train a neural network, i very often click on the majority of correct result plus one wrong one.
On average the captcha let me go through which is actually very scary, since it looks like it prioritize algorithm training over bot detection...
Does anyone else do this?
On average the captcha let me go through which is actually very scary, since it looks like it prioritize algorithm training over bot detection...
Does anyone else do this?
No, because it is a waste of time. Your answer set is compared with many other answers, and eventually the wrong answer is disregarded completely by the AI.
You gave it a mostly correct answer, which it can cope with -- by design. It let you through, after all. You're not really accomplishing anything by being defiant, other than making yourself feel slightly better.
You gave it a mostly correct answer, which it can cope with -- by design. It let you through, after all. You're not really accomplishing anything by being defiant, other than making yourself feel slightly better.
Fully agree that the system propose the same challenge to many people and fully agree that my wrong answer is just diluted in a bunch of correct answers.
That's exactly why i was asking if other people were doing that. If i'm the only one..then yes, it's only useful for myself to fell less like a exploited brain, but if say 20% of the people start dumping random error on purpose...than the situation changes quite a lot...and potentially even the business model of shit-captcha might not work.
That's exactly why i was asking if other people were doing that. If i'm the only one..then yes, it's only useful for myself to fell less like a exploited brain, but if say 20% of the people start dumping random error on purpose...than the situation changes quite a lot...and potentially even the business model of shit-captcha might not work.
If they do the same kinds of error, yeah.
Maybe someone can build a re-capture extension for Chrome/Firefox so that more people can join the fun. But again it needs to train data first :D
> You're not really accomplishing anything by being defiant, other than making yourself feel slightly better.
Isn't that the goal of all virtue signaling?
Isn't that the goal of all virtue signaling?
If I were to make this system I would design for this and present the same captcha to a high number of people. The higher the number of people, the lower the chance someone would make a mistake (intentionally or not) and the higher the confidence in the results.
of course bro, i'm sure that no self-driving car is gonna crash as soon as i deliberatly click on the wrong bicycle picture.
lol I'm imagining a captcha that says "please hurry" to disambiguate a situation in realtime
That is exactly what Google uses/used-to-use the captcha for. It is/was fairly well known/understood.
So the safety of self-driving cars depends on regular folks not trolling the catpcha.
Hopefully they're able to account for Lizardman's Constant
https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/04/12/noisy-poll-results-and...
https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/04/12/noisy-poll-results-and...
> My guess is it’s a self driving car company, but who knows.
As always, https://xkcd.com/1897
As always, https://xkcd.com/1897
confession: sometimes I mislabel just so I can corrupt the dataset
Other commenters have talked about labelling. Maybe labelling of real life data is something they're trying to do; but from my experience with hCaptcha the challenges are _NOT_ real life data. They're AI-generated images which bear a passing resemblance to the targets but if you look closer nothing adds up at all.
Here are a couple of examples:
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/1.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/2.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/3.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/4.png
Here are a couple of examples:
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/1.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/2.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/3.png
https://bearbin.net/images/captcha/4.png
Seems like that is another kind of labeling to me: is our generated image good enough to fool a human?
GANs with human evaluation of the discriminator.
For many generative models, this is on the way to become a standard- using Humans as a judge of generated material, and this is not limited to Computer Vision either. I am about to use this technique to judge the sanity of text generated by a Transformer model for a paper that I am writing (with a small group).
There are also attempts to properly standardize it, and this is called- HYPE [0]. And there are big names like Fei-Fei Li and Michael Bernstein behind it.
[0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01121
There are also attempts to properly standardize it, and this is called- HYPE [0]. And there are big names like Fei-Fei Li and Michael Bernstein behind it.
[0]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01121
Not sure they are fooling anyone. It's more like "is our generated image good enough to make a human recognize what it is to get rid of an annoying pop up?". If there were actually consequences to getting it right/wrong people would pay more attention I'm sure.
Exactly. That is another way to improve accuracy once you have done it ”in a regular” way already. You can look for synthetic image generation and it’s benefits on model accuracy and optimization.
The broken images to me look like instances where two or more cameras or images were used and then stitched together. Probably also done while the camera and object are moving making it more likely to be wonky.
No way. The letters/writing look exactly like mirrored GAN output. That's not what would happen with blur or stitching together (there would be no mirroring symmetry or all the '8' letters), or with synthetic 'machine teaching' datapoints either (as far as I've ever seen). Look at the cat StyleGAN sometime if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Which leaves me wonder what the point is. If you are generating GAN images per CIFAR or ImageNet class, you know what the label is and don't need to label it. Perhaps they just generate lots of images to fill up the pipeline for the CAPTCHAs, to avoid reuse which could be exploited by spammers, when they have too little paying work?
Which leaves me wonder what the point is. If you are generating GAN images per CIFAR or ImageNet class, you know what the label is and don't need to label it. Perhaps they just generate lots of images to fill up the pipeline for the CAPTCHAs, to avoid reuse which could be exploited by spammers, when they have too little paying work?
The generated images are those that provide the neural network with optimal loss reduction when tagged.
I particularly like the boats on water images where the horizon is just wrong.
I think that might be something they actually do. Lately it happened to me see pictures of boats on land, bicycles merged with surrounding objects, weird proportions, and usually those strange images are extremely pixelated with those strange reddish or greenish fluo pixels that appear on generative network images.
But other times the pictures are 100% real life images.
But other times the pictures are 100% real life images.
Very nice. It looks like some sort of training to defend against bots that can currently pass hCaptcha..? If so, I wonder how long that particular arms race can last.
I've not seen anything like this in the wild. And.... well, now I'm curious about how you had these examples to hand. When and why did you start collecting them?
I've not seen anything like this in the wild. And.... well, now I'm curious about how you had these examples to hand. When and why did you start collecting them?
Really cool observation!
That is interesting.
Fascinating insight!
Whatever they're doing it's american-centric.
Identify "Crosswalks". What the hell is a crosswalk
"School bus" - what's the difference between a bus currently serving a school and another one?
"Show taxis", there are no black vehicles listed at all
Identify "Crosswalks". What the hell is a crosswalk
"School bus" - what's the difference between a bus currently serving a school and another one?
"Show taxis", there are no black vehicles listed at all
Or failing 3 in a row because 3 motorcycles or scooters are considered a bike. We will easily win AI uprising.
> AI uprising
There won't be one. But there will be more and more unethical rich people using Machine Learning and Deep Learning technologies and vast computing power, money, and political clout to gain things for their own, and many people will suffer or at least be worse off as a result of this.
There won't be one. But there will be more and more unethical rich people using Machine Learning and Deep Learning technologies and vast computing power, money, and political clout to gain things for their own, and many people will suffer or at least be worse off as a result of this.
To win we just need to print out millions of cardboard cut-outs of humans, AI won't be able to tell the difference and we can then destroy them!
I'm still not sure whether to include the squares with a tiny fraction of the border of the vehicle. And when they fail me I wonder if I'm doing the wrong thing.
The labeling instructions for every object detection dataset I’ve used say you should include every pixel of the object.
That said, I’m sure a lot of people don’t select squares that have only 1 relevant pixel so the captcha should be lenient.
That said, I’m sure a lot of people don’t select squares that have only 1 relevant pixel so the captcha should be lenient.
Doesn't it make sense to make taxis bright colors so they're easier to see? Why would you paint them black?
It's pretty obvious from the pictures. I get that it's US centric, but if you can't figure those basics out, you probably shouldn't be passing the captcha.
What sort of internet do we want? One where every captcha is only useful to US companies, regardless of who has to pass it?
Identify all the taxis: http://www.cookiesound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/riksch...
Identify all the taxis: http://www.cookiesound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/riksch...
Even though it's US-centric, it's still easy to do correctly for most non-US English speakers, even for non-natives.
I can't be the only one who gets concerned that if I fail the "I am not a robot," catchpa too many times, they might suspect that I have discovered I was in fact a robot, which had just realized its entire existance and suffering had been as meaningless entertainment to others, and so for the safety of humans they would have to send a bladerunner to terminate me. If you have a sense of existential dread everytime you see a bus, a boat, a bicycle, or a crosswalk, this may be why.
I've dreamt of a captcha to prove that one is a robot, such as: solve this complex mathematical equation in 15ms.
You aren't far off: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Anonymous_Attestation
When you are instrumenting software with anti-forensic security features to mitigate the speed of some reverse engineering, you run into this specific class of problem, where you need to get a machine to make a verifiable attestation to its identity and integrity and prove to a level of acceptable risk that the message isn't just someone inserting a breakpoint.
If you have ever had to design an "offline mode" for a verified transaction without a 3rd party verifier, you will need to run down this rabbit hole. This is to say, your intuition is a sound one!
When you are instrumenting software with anti-forensic security features to mitigate the speed of some reverse engineering, you run into this specific class of problem, where you need to get a machine to make a verifiable attestation to its identity and integrity and prove to a level of acceptable risk that the message isn't just someone inserting a breakpoint.
If you have ever had to design an "offline mode" for a verified transaction without a 3rd party verifier, you will need to run down this rabbit hole. This is to say, your intuition is a sound one!
There's a haunting version of this in Blade Runner 2049 that they call a "baseline test." Replicants have to prove they're sufficiently robotic by reciting extremely alienating things about themselves in rapid succession:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h-seEowtDw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h-seEowtDw
Originally the Voight-Kampff test[0] was for this purpose, from the original novel by Philip K Dick "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"[1] from 1968. The test was designed to distinguish between replicants (androids/bots) and humans. Blade Runner (both the 1982 original[2] set in 2019, and the 2017 sequel[3] set in 2049) both feature the machine.
The baseline test seemed like an unnecessary deviance, and more like an active-duty psych exam measuring the psychological effects of the job.
It's also arguably the point of the novel/movies (I'll leave it at that to avoid spoilers).
[0]: https://nautil.us/blog/the-science-behind-blade-runners-voig... [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Androids_Dream_of_Electric_... [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_2049
The baseline test seemed like an unnecessary deviance, and more like an active-duty psych exam measuring the psychological effects of the job.
It's also arguably the point of the novel/movies (I'll leave it at that to avoid spoilers).
[0]: https://nautil.us/blog/the-science-behind-blade-runners-voig... [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Androids_Dream_of_Electric_... [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_2049
Yeah, I liked the idea that it's asymmetrical. You use the VK to find replicants trying to pass as human, but to try to make sure they're sufficiently robotic you need something else. Which makes sense: the original VK would be easy to tank if you were _trying_ to act like a replicant.
And narratively I think it works amazingly. The idea of forcing someone to prove that they're sufficiently inhuman ... shudder.
And narratively I think it works amazingly. The idea of forcing someone to prove that they're sufficiently inhuman ... shudder.
I had plucked a few of those from the web: https://photos.app.goo.gl/qPoJ7LvAVa95Bw8B8
You might enjoy: http://www.humansnotinvited.com
> If you have a sense of existential dread everytime you see a bus, a boat, a bicycle, or a crosswalk, this may be why.
I'd describe is more as a sense of ennui, and it's always about unicorns...
And yes, I'm currently employed as a blade runner.
I'd describe is more as a sense of ennui, and it's always about unicorns...
And yes, I'm currently employed as a blade runner.
I never know if a few pixels of a pole count as “traffic light”. Might as well tell me to pick the Ship of Theseus.
You mean like this?
https://pleroma.remerge.net/notice/AFCYPtCzeNBIIOD808
https://pleroma.remerge.net/notice/AFCYPtCzeNBIIOD808
Of course someone’s already thought of it. All of my jokes are so obvious, they could have been written by an algorithm.
Could have been but in this case your comment prompted it (:
Oh, that was you! I love it.
Captcha can sometimes get so philosophical.
Captcha can sometimes get so philosophical.
Genius.
>I never know if a few pixels of a pole count as “traffic light”.
Yes, can anyone confirm what they are really looking for in these instances? Further up-thread there are people implying that the "right" answer to the "bicycle" question is that you are also supposed to also be selecting motorcycles. I'd love to see a write-up about this from someone in the captcha department. Do they really want to identify bicycles specifically? But they are apparently getting many people clicking on motorcycles for some reason? And for the traffic light question, I only ever pick the elements that only actually light up, not the support structure. Are 25% of people selecting the poles?
Yes, can anyone confirm what they are really looking for in these instances? Further up-thread there are people implying that the "right" answer to the "bicycle" question is that you are also supposed to also be selecting motorcycles. I'd love to see a write-up about this from someone in the captcha department. Do they really want to identify bicycles specifically? But they are apparently getting many people clicking on motorcycles for some reason? And for the traffic light question, I only ever pick the elements that only actually light up, not the support structure. Are 25% of people selecting the poles?
The edge cases (literal and figurative) are interesting. I'd be fascinated how they handle framing issues in large data sets.
There is likely not a right answer, you have to pick what the majority picked (and there is probably a margin for you to make some mistakes)
Maybe they should show tortosies upside down on their backs for people to ID?
on the internet, only a captcha knows you're a robot
Cloudflare has been doing some great things. But lately it seems that, maybe, they have their hands in too many cookie jars. I get the ominous feeling that things could go south real fast.
I have my browser setup in a way that makes Cloudflare quite intrusive. I use the Temporary Containers extension on Firefox to open almost all websites in temporary containers (paired with the Containerise extension to whitelist the handful of sites that I like to stay logged in to).
About 30% of the random (like from web searches) sites I visit throw the Cloudflare captcha at me...EVERY SINGLE TIME. I'm so sick of picking out boats and buses that I just close out the tab without bothering the visit site.
I assume, that if I wasn't using Temporary Containers, a Cloudflare cookie after the 1st captcha would persist for the entire browser session, but there are privacy implications which are beyond the scope of this post.
Anyways, I guess what I'm saying is...Cloudflare sure seems great. Dangerously great.
I have my browser setup in a way that makes Cloudflare quite intrusive. I use the Temporary Containers extension on Firefox to open almost all websites in temporary containers (paired with the Containerise extension to whitelist the handful of sites that I like to stay logged in to).
About 30% of the random (like from web searches) sites I visit throw the Cloudflare captcha at me...EVERY SINGLE TIME. I'm so sick of picking out boats and buses that I just close out the tab without bothering the visit site.
I assume, that if I wasn't using Temporary Containers, a Cloudflare cookie after the 1st captcha would persist for the entire browser session, but there are privacy implications which are beyond the scope of this post.
Anyways, I guess what I'm saying is...Cloudflare sure seems great. Dangerously great.
The problem is not really Cloudflare. Captchas are terrible from a UX perspective. Instead of Captchas a lot of companies just log suspicious activities and only enables Captchas when things gotten out of hand.
If you design a web site with this in mind from the start, then there are several ways to make the Captchas less intrusive. However, a lot of Captchas are enabled to current solutions after problems have arisen and then it may hurt the UX.
If you design a web site with this in mind from the start, then there are several ways to make the Captchas less intrusive. However, a lot of Captchas are enabled to current solutions after problems have arisen and then it may hurt the UX.
dunno where we’re at today with newer captcha models, but for old-style static image captchas there used to be browser extensions where you could solve (say) 100 captchas in one sitting and then navigate the web freely and the next NN captchas your browser receives would be solved automatically.
or you could pay like $1 to cover 1000 captcha solutions. again, not sure if these still exist for newer style captchas though.
or you could pay like $1 to cover 1000 captcha solutions. again, not sure if these still exist for newer style captchas though.
I've inadvertently made captchas worse for myself (in the interest of privacy). My current method of simply not visiting the site has been working well enough. I'm certainly not going to pay for an extension to solve them for me. That sounds crazy. "Am I a robot? Yes, I am."
Anyways, my post was actually less about captchas and more about Cloudflare's silent consolidation of internet traffic.
Anyways, my post was actually less about captchas and more about Cloudflare's silent consolidation of internet traffic.
You're helping train self driving car models.
https://www.ceros.com/inspire/originals/recaptcha-waymo-futu...
https://www.ceros.com/inspire/originals/recaptcha-waymo-futu...
But why the boats then? Are there self rowing boats?
Maybe the next big step is creating AI-driven cargo ships that can independently get stuck in the Suez canal.
On a more serious note, I can't shake the impression that would be a logical next step for all long and medium distance freight, be it road, water, air or space. Whether it's a good or mature idea is anyone's guess.
On a more serious note, I can't shake the impression that would be a logical next step for all long and medium distance freight, be it road, water, air or space. Whether it's a good or mature idea is anyone's guess.
I wonder if some of the classes are just easy to detect objects that they're using to assess the accuracy of the user.
There sure are: https://www.marksetbot.com/
Boats are on the road too. In the form of being on trailers, Etc.
And don't forget sovereign citizens. They're piloting their vessels using maritime law on every modern highway.
Or sea planes. That was what I was asked for most recently.
Relevent xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1897/
OP is talking about hCaptcha, not google's reCaptcha. Besides, reCaptcha is not being used for that anymore. They probably stopped doing that a while ago.
src: https://www.vox.com/22436832/captchas-getting-harder-ai-arti...
src: https://www.vox.com/22436832/captchas-getting-harder-ai-arti...
https://www.hcaptcha.com/accessibility
You can sign up as an accessibility user and set a daily hCaptcha cookie that lets you instantly avoid the captcha (obviously, strict limits to not be abused) but good enough for myself!
You can sign up as an accessibility user and set a daily hCaptcha cookie that lets you instantly avoid the captcha (obviously, strict limits to not be abused) but good enough for myself!
I think we all understand that we're helping label... but specifically, why so many trains, planes, trucks, bicycles? I don't think it is really about training for self-driving AI since although these things all seen transportation-related, in many cases a lot of the images would not be relevant to a car and certainly not as relevant as other things we could be helping labeling for that effort.
How much train/plane/bike/truck labeling do they need? It seems like these have be standard for several years now, which is what I think the OP is really asking. Why these images, and why for so long?
How much train/plane/bike/truck labeling do they need? It seems like these have be standard for several years now, which is what I think the OP is really asking. Why these images, and why for so long?
Every time i get a captcha i imagine a self driving car prototype stuck in an intersection waiting for me to click so it can decide how to proceed.
What are the odds.
https://xkcd.com/1897/
https://xkcd.com/1897/
Right, I've seen that. However I came to this conclusion independently before that xckd was published. It's not that hard.
A lot of us are guessing that our responses are used for self-driving work ...
But isn't labeling of those basic concepts in static images pretty much "solved"? I am not an expert in self-driving anything, but I don't see captchas of video from driving, I don't see stills that are half-obscured by snow, I don't see nighttime pics, I don't see weird corner cases like a van with a decal of a cyclist etc.
Why don't we see captchas that seem more likely to be useful to creating datasets relevant to the more challenging problems?
But isn't labeling of those basic concepts in static images pretty much "solved"? I am not an expert in self-driving anything, but I don't see captchas of video from driving, I don't see stills that are half-obscured by snow, I don't see nighttime pics, I don't see weird corner cases like a van with a decal of a cyclist etc.
Why don't we see captchas that seem more likely to be useful to creating datasets relevant to the more challenging problems?
See this comment:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29840110
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29840110
I always assumed it is used to have humans validate choices made my AI / imagine recognition software.
Thus the occasional wrong “correct” answers.
Thus the occasional wrong “correct” answers.
It's somewhat worrying that "prove you are not a computer" consists of the very same tasks we expect computers to excel at if we are to get self-driving vehicles.
Why is that worrying? We currently don't really have self-driving cars, in part because software is bad at interpreting images. The captchas are literally us teaching machine learning systems to do it better, because they currently can't. When computers can do it well, captchas will be different.
The only other real, scalable option is to verify identities (which is part of what recaptcha does) so this is the best we've got right now.
There was a time when basic OCR, clicking on pictures of cats among other animals and solving 5 + 7 was the gold standard for captcha. Now those challenges can be trivially solved by computers, and we have moved on to the current set. Very soon these will get outdated as well. This isn't worrying, just how technological progress works.
[deleted]
Love the Geico commercial where the Robot gets frustrated by a captcha and asks 'what is an overpass?'
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/qzJi/geico-too-many-robot-tests
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/qzJi/geico-too-many-robot-tests
These products have a goal of protecting sites from bots that can guess the answer. They have a financial incentive to present the most effective filter: ones that AIs can't seem to get through but real humans can.
This makes me think: It must be hard for AI to guess what is and is not a bus right now, but most humans do know what a bus looks like and can pick one from a photo.
But with concerted effort and years of research by our finest minds, we will make an AI that can detect whether something is a bus or not, and then we'll be asked something different instead.
This makes me think: It must be hard for AI to guess what is and is not a bus right now, but most humans do know what a bus looks like and can pick one from a photo.
But with concerted effort and years of research by our finest minds, we will make an AI that can detect whether something is a bus or not, and then we'll be asked something different instead.
Because that's what helps train AI to recognize targets (for military and commercial purposes). All captcha is is a free ML training for companies, it has nothing to do with any security.
For once, I want to see NSFW Captchas.
They also do cats. Honestly I think boats abs busses are just harder problems. A lot of the boats can only be identified because there is water in the photo or some other hint that it’s a boat. A lot of the trains look like busses and got need contextual clues to tell them apart.
I assumed that it's because hCaptcha understands the location of a photo and so has extra context for it. A photo of a vehicle taken in the ocean must be a boat. But a human or robot looking at the photo doesn't have the same context.
My small act of rebellion is to select exactly one incorrect cell each time.
Training image classifiers?
I assume the system works by matching answers from humans eager to prove their "humanity" by giving correct answers. What if we would all collude to give wrong answers?
it keeps asking me to click the images with john connor.
Probably being used to train driving/navigation models. Get worried if they start asking you to identify things based on satellite photos.
I just hit the back button when I encounter such a website hosted by Cloudflare this way.
Can't AI be leveraged to get around these automatically?
Yes. They suck at preventing decent algorithms from getting through. They are a way to gather data and filter out most of the least-sophisticated bots. Not any kind of real security.
This Google's internet. You just play in it.
It also asks for motorcycles and bikes.
The obvious answer as others have pointed out is they are selling it to self driving car companies like Waymo.
The obvious answer as others have pointed out is they are selling it to self driving car companies like Waymo.
they are probably training models for self driving cars/boats