Are you a real programmer?(imgs.xkcd.com)

12 pointsby ozzieg18 वर्ष पहले13 comments

imgs.xkcd.com

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/real_programmers.png

14 comments

anirbas18 वर्ष पहले

http://xkcd.com/378/

The alt-text makes most xkcd cartoons; they're not complete without it.

mhartl18 वर्ष पहले

Yes; this PNG is not a complete xkcd comic. Whoever submitted this (I'm looking at you, anirbas :-) will now have to reread every xkcd comic to get the alt text, too. For those who don't know what I'm talking about, mouse over any xkcd cartoon and leave it there for a few seconds. (Firefox users: install https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1715 first.) For those didn't know: I feel your pain. That was me about six months ago.

kajecounterhack18 वर्ष पहले

GUI kids like me like gedit, but on the terminal I don't see how anyone uses anything except vi!

Yeah the alt text is sort of important too... I never realized there was any until I went on IE at someone else's computer though. Stupid firefox!

ubudesign18 वर्ष पहले

I use emacs to write in binary

alaskamiller18 वर्ष पहले

adnam18 वर्ष पहले

I just scream tones down my phoneline.

brent18 वर्ष पहले

seconded.

[deleted]18 वर्ष पहले

softwarejim18 वर्ष पहले

yup...I'm an emacs guy.

tjr18 वर्ष पहले

GNU Emacs or XEmacs?

Or ?...

Prrometheus18 वर्ष पहले

It took me forever to figure out that xemacs isn't emacs for X

bayareaguy18 वर्ष पहले

or (shudder) Emacs.NET !

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1069

the horror.. the horror..

Any good recursive acronyms for it?

http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/gnuemacs.acro.exp.html

softwarejim18 वर्ष पहले

GNU Emacs on Windows, but not for any special reason. Help convince me, is XEmacs better?

tjr18 वर्ष पहले

Not necessarily better. I was just being silly, really; haven't used XEmacs myself for years.

XEmacs was a fork off of GNU Emacs. They did some good things with the software, but they were loose in their legal matters, and accordingly the FSF never accepted XEmacs code back into the GNU Emacs mainline.