Ask HN: Am I expecting too much?
67 comments
Quit, join a small company. I did five long years at a multinational megacorp without realizing that life could be better. It was like prison for programmers. When I finally quit to be employee #5 at a bootstrapped startup it was a revelation. After I had been at the startup for a month it still didn't feel real - it felt like I was on vacation from my previous job. It took a long time for it to sink in that I didn't have to go back. Ever!
It's possible to enjoy work! Don't make my mistake and waste years in an environment you hate - I should have left after 3 months instead of 5 years. I will never work for a large corporation again.
It's possible to enjoy work! Don't make my mistake and waste years in an environment you hate - I should have left after 3 months instead of 5 years. I will never work for a large corporation again.
Except these things could be preventing such a transition:
* Moving expenses to $EXPENSIVE_TECH_CITY
* Student loan debt
* Credit card debt
* Car loan + auto insurance
* Severe pay cut
* No experience building CRUD apps
Or MSCCSN for short.
* Moving expenses to $EXPENSIVE_TECH_CITY
* Student loan debt
* Credit card debt
* Car loan + auto insurance
* Severe pay cut
* No experience building CRUD apps
Or MSCCSN for short.
That was not my experience at all. I didn't take a pay cut moving to a small company. My salary stayed about the same, I had similar benefits, and I got a little equity which a few years later was worth a nice bonus. Staying at a large company all you're going to get is the standard 3 to 5 percent cost of living increase every year.
Generally I do not think it's true that large companies pay better than small ones - if anything the opposite.
Re: moving to an expensive tech city, perhaps that might be an issue, but there are smaller companies in lots of places, not just Silicon Valley.
Generally I do not think it's true that large companies pay better than small ones - if anything the opposite.
Re: moving to an expensive tech city, perhaps that might be an issue, but there are smaller companies in lots of places, not just Silicon Valley.
> Generally I do not think it's true that large companies pay better than small ones - if anything the opposite.
Anecdotal data point: I recently made the switch from startup to Megacorp, and my base salary remained the same, but my equity compensation went from being made of unicorn farts and fairy dust to something a little more real. Meaning if I stay the year, my total comp'll jump roughly 50%.
And my base salary at the startup was pretty good compared to some of my friends working at smaller places.
Anecdotal data point: I recently made the switch from startup to Megacorp, and my base salary remained the same, but my equity compensation went from being made of unicorn farts and fairy dust to something a little more real. Meaning if I stay the year, my total comp'll jump roughly 50%.
And my base salary at the startup was pretty good compared to some of my friends working at smaller places.
* A family to support.
It's a hard decision to fall in love before you've found what kind of job you liked.
It's a hard decision to fall in love before you've found what kind of job you liked.
"Severe pay cut"
That is my experience too. About 50% off when you start and if you are really good and they like you and... 10% off.
That is my experience too. About 50% off when you start and if you are really good and they like you and... 10% off.
Indeed, better to find another job before quitting. Less pressure.
Every situation is unique and every person is different. But I share my thoughts.
- The right place is the one that helps you achieve your life goals. It sounds like you may be in the wrong place but that doesn't mean you should quit just yet.
- Its probably a good time to start making friends at other companies. Its fine if its casual. You just need to start building your network. If you do this right you may never have to apply for a job or draft a resume again (I haven't).
- You are getting a lot of tasks thrown your way (which is great) but don't make the mistake of thinking doing most the work means you should be recognised as a senior. Thats not at all how it works. Especially in a corporate culture.
- Keep making your seniors look good. You don't want to be a threat to them. If their career advances they will take you with them. You want every to feel that they are more likely to succeed with you around.
- You probably have a lot of energy and motivation at this point in your career so it worth finding a place where you can better thrive. Before you leave your current position however I would be sure you have learned everything you want to learn there. You don't want to be a noob walking into your second position.
Hope this helps.
- The right place is the one that helps you achieve your life goals. It sounds like you may be in the wrong place but that doesn't mean you should quit just yet.
- Its probably a good time to start making friends at other companies. Its fine if its casual. You just need to start building your network. If you do this right you may never have to apply for a job or draft a resume again (I haven't).
- You are getting a lot of tasks thrown your way (which is great) but don't make the mistake of thinking doing most the work means you should be recognised as a senior. Thats not at all how it works. Especially in a corporate culture.
- Keep making your seniors look good. You don't want to be a threat to them. If their career advances they will take you with them. You want every to feel that they are more likely to succeed with you around.
- You probably have a lot of energy and motivation at this point in your career so it worth finding a place where you can better thrive. Before you leave your current position however I would be sure you have learned everything you want to learn there. You don't want to be a noob walking into your second position.
Hope this helps.
x10 this:
> - Keep making your seniors look good. You don't want to be a threat to them. If their career advances they will take you with them. You want every to feel that they are more likely to succeed with you around.
> - Keep making your seniors look good. You don't want to be a threat to them. If their career advances they will take you with them. You want every to feel that they are more likely to succeed with you around.
One thing that stands out for me is the ratio of onshore to offshore engineers. I have only worked in a few organizations with offshore teams but the experience has always been frustrating.
First, if you're working in an organization like this, it means they value cost management over product. I know that's a sweeping generalization because it's possible to build good products with offshore teams, but it takes tremendous effort, or unusual coordination at the offshore location. This brings me to the second point.
If the product work is being driven by the onshore team, at the ratios mentioned, then a large portion of your time will be coordinating with the offshore team. This can be a demoralizing process. I've often found that it would take me an hour to do what it took me 30 minutes to coordinate and the offshore team 3 hours to implement, for example. The response from management is that this is still a force multiplier and so it's worthwhile.
So as a rule, I avoid companies that do this and I walk away when the offshore cost savings buzz is in the air.
If you actually enjoy building software, then that's a special gift. Many people you'll come across in the profession regard it as a job. You should seek an environment where the people seem to have an active interest in these things.
I don't know where you live, but you might look into an HN meetup or something similar. As others have said, work on building up an informal network. It only takes one good connection to make a great difference in your professional life. Good luck!
First, if you're working in an organization like this, it means they value cost management over product. I know that's a sweeping generalization because it's possible to build good products with offshore teams, but it takes tremendous effort, or unusual coordination at the offshore location. This brings me to the second point.
If the product work is being driven by the onshore team, at the ratios mentioned, then a large portion of your time will be coordinating with the offshore team. This can be a demoralizing process. I've often found that it would take me an hour to do what it took me 30 minutes to coordinate and the offshore team 3 hours to implement, for example. The response from management is that this is still a force multiplier and so it's worthwhile.
So as a rule, I avoid companies that do this and I walk away when the offshore cost savings buzz is in the air.
If you actually enjoy building software, then that's a special gift. Many people you'll come across in the profession regard it as a job. You should seek an environment where the people seem to have an active interest in these things.
I don't know where you live, but you might look into an HN meetup or something similar. As others have said, work on building up an informal network. It only takes one good connection to make a great difference in your professional life. Good luck!
It seems to me like you try to make your job better, and outshine on all areas, but you are not trying to do it in a corporate way.
Your bosses only care for 2 things, and those things are the only things that you can use to get their attention and implement change.
1) Does the change make more money You have to show them, prove them that the change you try to implement will make more money down the hill. Will it attract more customers, will it make customers spend even more, how can you quantify this idea into money.
2) Does the change save money spent If you can prove them that the change will save them money that they are currently losing, then you have to show them how. Show statistics, show numbers.
This is the only thing that works with almost any corporate company and almost every work occupation that I have seen, talked to with other people, and learned all the way.
You either make more money, or you save money, everything else noone cares about.
Especially as a developer, you might know that changing a codebase MIGHT be easier down the road, but unless it is quantifiable by numbers and money, noone cares.
Your bosses only care for 2 things, and those things are the only things that you can use to get their attention and implement change.
1) Does the change make more money You have to show them, prove them that the change you try to implement will make more money down the hill. Will it attract more customers, will it make customers spend even more, how can you quantify this idea into money.
2) Does the change save money spent If you can prove them that the change will save them money that they are currently losing, then you have to show them how. Show statistics, show numbers.
This is the only thing that works with almost any corporate company and almost every work occupation that I have seen, talked to with other people, and learned all the way.
You either make more money, or you save money, everything else noone cares about.
Especially as a developer, you might know that changing a codebase MIGHT be easier down the road, but unless it is quantifiable by numbers and money, noone cares.
You name two reasons that always should result in you finding another job: A) You do the job one level up and don't get recognized. B) You can't connect to your colleagues.
Look for a company that is quite different from your current one (e.g. a major software company, another size, another location) and then try again. If you recognize that these two points are still the same you definitely need to change something about your style. But for now changing the company seems the most reasonable choice.
Look for a company that is quite different from your current one (e.g. a major software company, another size, another location) and then try again. If you recognize that these two points are still the same you definitely need to change something about your style. But for now changing the company seems the most reasonable choice.
Just because someone cannot connect with colleagues in two consecutive companies mean the person has to change something in him/her self. In the current working scenario, it will not be a surprise at all when a person with great attitude is not able to connect with this colleagues/work in most of the places.
What you say sounds a lot like looking for excuses. It doesn't matter if there are reasons for why it may not be you. The thing that matters is that you should always try to improve yourself and if you have two consecutive, independent experiences with the same outcome, then it's a good hint that you can start to work on yourself there (instead of improving your coding skills or updating your vimrc file, for instance).
> I'm very unhappy at my company
> Am I expecting too much?
> Is this just how software engineering is?
> my own unrealistic expectations
> I generally don't get any response whatsoever
> it would at least be nice to get some feedback, and I never get any
> I just can't seem to connect with anyone at work
> there might not be enough interest to warrant having such meetings
> you can do what is essentially bad work and still get paid
> the response has basically been "That must be frustrating"
> I'm wondering whether this is due to the company
All company outside a few small areas is exactly like this, the exceptions being:
* Startups
* Open-source
There is nothing wrong with this company. This is how pretty much all companies are. This kind of environment is suitable for 85% of software engineers. They like it that way, and they want it that way. Companies do not want to be dependent on heroics. They want a predictable process.
> I spend a large part of my weekends writing code for prototypes and projects
* Be on the outlook for a sufficently-funded startup where you could be the CTO or technical co-founder
* Join an open source project
Do not talk about this to other people in the company. In the meanwhile, until you have landed your new role, avoid disturbing other people, or make them feel inadequate. Companies fundamentally cannot use people like you. It is contrary to their desire to keep things predictable, both good and bad things.
By the way, personality-wise, I am pretty much like you. I am a co-founder in 3 startups and 2 open-source projects. It may be annoying for you that you are not suitable for working in most companies around, but at the same time, if you find the right place to work at, you will have much, much more fun and make much, much more money than in a "normal" job.
> Am I expecting too much?
> Is this just how software engineering is?
> my own unrealistic expectations
> I generally don't get any response whatsoever
> it would at least be nice to get some feedback, and I never get any
> I just can't seem to connect with anyone at work
> there might not be enough interest to warrant having such meetings
> you can do what is essentially bad work and still get paid
> the response has basically been "That must be frustrating"
> I'm wondering whether this is due to the company
All company outside a few small areas is exactly like this, the exceptions being:
* Startups
* Open-source
There is nothing wrong with this company. This is how pretty much all companies are. This kind of environment is suitable for 85% of software engineers. They like it that way, and they want it that way. Companies do not want to be dependent on heroics. They want a predictable process.
> I spend a large part of my weekends writing code for prototypes and projects
* Be on the outlook for a sufficently-funded startup where you could be the CTO or technical co-founder
* Join an open source project
Do not talk about this to other people in the company. In the meanwhile, until you have landed your new role, avoid disturbing other people, or make them feel inadequate. Companies fundamentally cannot use people like you. It is contrary to their desire to keep things predictable, both good and bad things.
By the way, personality-wise, I am pretty much like you. I am a co-founder in 3 startups and 2 open-source projects. It may be annoying for you that you are not suitable for working in most companies around, but at the same time, if you find the right place to work at, you will have much, much more fun and make much, much more money than in a "normal" job.
Good advice. I work for a company like he describes and I can vouch for everything you said. You can't rock the boat too much at a company that see tech as a means to an end. If you're passionate about tech Acme megacorp is the wrong place to be.
How would one find such a place?
No, your expectations are not too high. You need to feel ok at work and if you are passionate about the type of work you do, it's reasonable to find a workplace where this sentiment is shared and going to work feels like fun.
I saw a few comments in this thread which said that this is simply the way it is at a large company. I strongly disagree. I've worked full time as a software engineer both at a small company with just a handful of programmers and, currently at a large corporation with over 8000 employees. In both cases, I've been surrounded by people with a passion for software. People who share my interests. People who want to excel at their job and deliver the best possible product. If you're someone with that kind of mindset, I urge you to look for a job where that is the norm. Part of the problem may be that you currently work for, as you yourself put it, a non-software company.
As others have pointed out, don't quit your job until you have a new one. If your search takes a while, or doesn't pan out, you may come to regret jumping the ship before you've found a new vessel. As a final note, let me point out that I am personally not familiar with the job market for programmers in the US. From what I've seen though, it seems like it is harsher than in Sweden.
I saw a few comments in this thread which said that this is simply the way it is at a large company. I strongly disagree. I've worked full time as a software engineer both at a small company with just a handful of programmers and, currently at a large corporation with over 8000 employees. In both cases, I've been surrounded by people with a passion for software. People who share my interests. People who want to excel at their job and deliver the best possible product. If you're someone with that kind of mindset, I urge you to look for a job where that is the norm. Part of the problem may be that you currently work for, as you yourself put it, a non-software company.
As others have pointed out, don't quit your job until you have a new one. If your search takes a while, or doesn't pan out, you may come to regret jumping the ship before you've found a new vessel. As a final note, let me point out that I am personally not familiar with the job market for programmers in the US. From what I've seen though, it seems like it is harsher than in Sweden.
Create a 'plan B', another job that you have lined up or a launching customer for your freelance career. Then, ask your current employer to be promoted, pronto to the function of senior engineer with associated pay-raise, citing the first couple of paragraphs of what you wrote above.
If they bite, give them a chance. If not, execute 'plan B'.
If they bite, give them a chance. If not, execute 'plan B'.
Hi Throwawaypotato,
I was in a similar position. Non-software company, basically one of two developers in a group whose focus was business. We would occasionally interact with other software teams in other departments to integrate our systems, and I would cherish those moments; but it was clear that across the organization overall view of software was that of a necessary evil.
I tried to convince the group about taking a new approach to how we developed software, to perhaps have more communication between the sparsely distributed software team, I even made a presentation over software processes, how we could improve... nothing ever changed anything. All they really cared was that we made the wishes of the sales team real...
After a year of firefighting, dealing with poor processes, and feeling overall undervalued I resigned to resume my PhD. My advice is that you change to a software company, and in general that you join a company where your role is a first class citizen (I've heard similar complains of friends who are, in say, a finance position within a structural engineering firm).
On the other hand, I left with a strong impression that these type of non-software or software adverse companies are great candidates for companies to either sell services or to directly compete against with more efficient services... perhaps a route I'll one day take.
Cheers!
I was in a similar position. Non-software company, basically one of two developers in a group whose focus was business. We would occasionally interact with other software teams in other departments to integrate our systems, and I would cherish those moments; but it was clear that across the organization overall view of software was that of a necessary evil.
I tried to convince the group about taking a new approach to how we developed software, to perhaps have more communication between the sparsely distributed software team, I even made a presentation over software processes, how we could improve... nothing ever changed anything. All they really cared was that we made the wishes of the sales team real...
After a year of firefighting, dealing with poor processes, and feeling overall undervalued I resigned to resume my PhD. My advice is that you change to a software company, and in general that you join a company where your role is a first class citizen (I've heard similar complains of friends who are, in say, a finance position within a structural engineering firm).
On the other hand, I left with a strong impression that these type of non-software or software adverse companies are great candidates for companies to either sell services or to directly compete against with more efficient services... perhaps a route I'll one day take.
Cheers!
I know some will say that the logistics of life--paying for stuff and the like--can dictate whether you compromise on your work environment. But, for me, I now wish I'd taken the approach of life being too short to waste it in a job that makes you unhappy. And the particulars of your situation really don't matter. If you're unhappy, you're unhappy and it's as simple as that. It feels like you're asking for permission to be unhappy based on the external circumstances. But whether your unhappiness is a natural consequence of your situation or not isn't going to make you happier.
So my advice would be to find something that makes you happy. This doesn't have to be a blind search...there's plenty of research on what makes a work environment fulfilling. The classic is the intrinsic motivators (autonomy, mastery, purpose) rather than the extrinsic motivators (money, fame and such). It sounds like your current environment doesn't have much going for it in the way of intrinsic motivation, so start by thinking about what a rewarding work experience looks like for you and then try to find it.
And if money is your thing (it does enable lots of things that can make your overall life happier), the lesson I've learned 20+ years into my career as a developer (and now management) is that worrying about money early in your career is a premature optimization. Worry about honing your craft and the money will take care of itself up to a certain point. When you progress beyond Senior into team leadership is when you should start thinking about getting paid, and you'll get there a lot sooner if you spend the beginning of your career learning as much as possible and ensuring that you don't stagnate. It doesn't take long to become very senior, but it's not just a matter of putting in the time. I've interviewed people with 20 years in the industry who basically had the same 2 years experience over and over. And I've interviewed people with just 5 years experience who were completely ready to take on technical leadership positions. Be the latter and you'll end up getting paid more over the course of your career.
So my advice would be to find something that makes you happy. This doesn't have to be a blind search...there's plenty of research on what makes a work environment fulfilling. The classic is the intrinsic motivators (autonomy, mastery, purpose) rather than the extrinsic motivators (money, fame and such). It sounds like your current environment doesn't have much going for it in the way of intrinsic motivation, so start by thinking about what a rewarding work experience looks like for you and then try to find it.
And if money is your thing (it does enable lots of things that can make your overall life happier), the lesson I've learned 20+ years into my career as a developer (and now management) is that worrying about money early in your career is a premature optimization. Worry about honing your craft and the money will take care of itself up to a certain point. When you progress beyond Senior into team leadership is when you should start thinking about getting paid, and you'll get there a lot sooner if you spend the beginning of your career learning as much as possible and ensuring that you don't stagnate. It doesn't take long to become very senior, but it's not just a matter of putting in the time. I've interviewed people with 20 years in the industry who basically had the same 2 years experience over and over. And I've interviewed people with just 5 years experience who were completely ready to take on technical leadership positions. Be the latter and you'll end up getting paid more over the course of your career.
It is easy to feel oppressed in software development. I don't mean to say that people in software development are oppressed, just that it's easy to feel that way. One of the goals of software development is to create a product that people don't notice or think about (something intuitive). I have found that it is common for developers to feel that their work goes unnoticed at times.
That being said, I would recommend three things:
1) Try to focus a little less on whether or not you've been treated as fairly as possible and look for ways you can improve things for everyone in the company. If you leave, someone else is going to have to deal with the same crap. Is there a way you can make it better?
2) Talk to higher management. Try to be objective and avoid blaming. Just identify things in the process that are causing you to feel unappreciated and ineffective. Could they involve you in more planning meetings? Could you start holding trainings to share knowledge among other developers?
3) Remember that you don't owe the company anything. You should absolutely be professional in all your dealings, but a job is a means to an end. If you aren't getting the pay, recognition, or satisfaction you're looking for, just look for another job. Companies live and die. Employees come and go. Don't get too emotionally tied to it.
That being said, I would recommend three things:
1) Try to focus a little less on whether or not you've been treated as fairly as possible and look for ways you can improve things for everyone in the company. If you leave, someone else is going to have to deal with the same crap. Is there a way you can make it better?
2) Talk to higher management. Try to be objective and avoid blaming. Just identify things in the process that are causing you to feel unappreciated and ineffective. Could they involve you in more planning meetings? Could you start holding trainings to share knowledge among other developers?
3) Remember that you don't owe the company anything. You should absolutely be professional in all your dealings, but a job is a means to an end. If you aren't getting the pay, recognition, or satisfaction you're looking for, just look for another job. Companies live and die. Employees come and go. Don't get too emotionally tied to it.
As someone said, it's time to move on but take it easy. Try to reduce your "extra working hours", at least try to get enough free time and make sure weekends "are weekends". You need time for you.
Now it's time to start thinking "what would you like to do next" and invest some time in a daily basis looking for companies and positions that you will feel motivated to apply. That research and process may take some time.
Ah, don't get into the "Engineer -> Senior Engineer -> Manager" thinking, titles are not important, what really matters is what you do and how much you enjoy it. If you enjoy what you do, you will succeed.
Now it's time to start thinking "what would you like to do next" and invest some time in a daily basis looking for companies and positions that you will feel motivated to apply. That research and process may take some time.
Ah, don't get into the "Engineer -> Senior Engineer -> Manager" thinking, titles are not important, what really matters is what you do and how much you enjoy it. If you enjoy what you do, you will succeed.
I've been in your exact situation- very nice, laid back people, but who are boring and have no desire to really improve or change things. It sucks, I feel for you.
Remember to respect the balance. What if you were on the opposite team? One that charged ahead, worked like crazy and valued only the smartest? That might be nice for a bit, but eventually it would wear on you in other ways, you'd be tired, stressed and feel undervalued.
But even after respecting the perks, you're restless. You want to be on a higher functioning team. I say quit, and quit right now. Because right now you're in a place in your life where you want to work hard, study and grow. So go find those people, they are out there. But leave on good terms, because in 5 years when you want to focus on your family, or take up a hobby, or just chill out, you'll want this type of job, and you'll be glad it's something you can come back to. And then 5 years after that, who knows, you'll get that itch again, and once more your off to the races.
Remember to respect the balance. What if you were on the opposite team? One that charged ahead, worked like crazy and valued only the smartest? That might be nice for a bit, but eventually it would wear on you in other ways, you'd be tired, stressed and feel undervalued.
But even after respecting the perks, you're restless. You want to be on a higher functioning team. I say quit, and quit right now. Because right now you're in a place in your life where you want to work hard, study and grow. So go find those people, they are out there. But leave on good terms, because in 5 years when you want to focus on your family, or take up a hobby, or just chill out, you'll want this type of job, and you'll be glad it's something you can come back to. And then 5 years after that, who knows, you'll get that itch again, and once more your off to the races.
You're probably at a good point to appreciate the following:
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-o...
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-o...
+1
I think this provides an excellent theoretical framework to think about types of people in a corporation, the fundamental objective of the corporation, and seems to explain many behavior of others.
OTOH, I still think this is just a framework and may not have any connection to actual reality.
In my experience (which is limited because I don't job hop), the non-software company that I worked for sounded very much like you describe. I did myself a disservice by not leaving sooner. I now work for a software company and it's very different. I am much happier here, working with no offshore bullshit and having co-workers who care about learning, sharing, and our products.
I can't tell you which is "normal", but I will advise you to try to leave. Socialize and network your little heart out, because if a friend recommends a place to work, you can be more sure that it won't suck, and it will be easier to get in the door.
I can't tell you which is "normal", but I will advise you to try to leave. Socialize and network your little heart out, because if a friend recommends a place to work, you can be more sure that it won't suck, and it will be easier to get in the door.
This is an incredibly well written, thoughtful post.
It's not someone else's job to make you happy. It's your job.
How to be happy is something we all work on every day. Nobody can tell you how to do it for you.
For me, some things that have helped are group exercise, meditation, social interaction, trying to challenge myself and being creative. Financial security is also important.
> I've been trying to make the best of things: the attitude I've tried to have over the past year has been that if I can identify various things that we do wrong at work, and can come up with better ways to do them, then it's almost as good as working somewhere where things actually get done in the right way
There's no place that does things perfectly. People deserve to be happy and I think you can find something better than your current situation if you keep looking. It may or may not mean changing your job.
Ultimately, what you're looking for may be found in yourself rather than in your workplace or from an answer on the internet. You can still change your job. My advice would be, consider what you want to do, and give it a try. If you're the decision maker then it's the right thing to do. Even if you're not the decider, when you look back and realize that it wasn't your choice, you've still learned something. Good luck!
It's not someone else's job to make you happy. It's your job.
How to be happy is something we all work on every day. Nobody can tell you how to do it for you.
For me, some things that have helped are group exercise, meditation, social interaction, trying to challenge myself and being creative. Financial security is also important.
> I've been trying to make the best of things: the attitude I've tried to have over the past year has been that if I can identify various things that we do wrong at work, and can come up with better ways to do them, then it's almost as good as working somewhere where things actually get done in the right way
There's no place that does things perfectly. People deserve to be happy and I think you can find something better than your current situation if you keep looking. It may or may not mean changing your job.
Ultimately, what you're looking for may be found in yourself rather than in your workplace or from an answer on the internet. You can still change your job. My advice would be, consider what you want to do, and give it a try. If you're the decision maker then it's the right thing to do. Even if you're not the decider, when you look back and realize that it wasn't your choice, you've still learned something. Good luck!
It depends. What are you willing to risk to get what you may want?
You have only been there a year and you are eager and motivated. This is great to hear. It also sounds like you enjoy writing software, also great.
Here is what you do not want to do: become a PITA.
Stop talking to management so much (at least for now), they probably are getting tired of it.
Also try to fit into the culture where you work (at least for now).
And absolutely always ALWAYS be a team player. Even if the senior doesn't know as much about the product as you do right now. Offer your help and be nice about it. Don't take things personally, even if someone is being rude to you. Also try to look for people who you admire professionally and help them whenever you can.
In the mean time focus on your skills and keep improving your corner of the world.
What will happen, sooner than later, is that those people you helped will remember you. And when they are in a position to affect positive change, they may return the favor.
While you are doing this, make mental notes of where you want to be and definitely do shop around. By being aware of the real world situations, you'll be better equipped to recognize a better situation.
Best of luck to you!
You have only been there a year and you are eager and motivated. This is great to hear. It also sounds like you enjoy writing software, also great.
Here is what you do not want to do: become a PITA.
Stop talking to management so much (at least for now), they probably are getting tired of it.
Also try to fit into the culture where you work (at least for now).
And absolutely always ALWAYS be a team player. Even if the senior doesn't know as much about the product as you do right now. Offer your help and be nice about it. Don't take things personally, even if someone is being rude to you. Also try to look for people who you admire professionally and help them whenever you can.
In the mean time focus on your skills and keep improving your corner of the world.
What will happen, sooner than later, is that those people you helped will remember you. And when they are in a position to affect positive change, they may return the favor.
While you are doing this, make mental notes of where you want to be and definitely do shop around. By being aware of the real world situations, you'll be better equipped to recognize a better situation.
Best of luck to you!
This. Every (good) job I've gotten has been from networking.
Finding good developers is hard, and companies love referrals. Those 3 senior devs that have quit likely found a job somewhere else, and that somewhere else will be hiring.
If they remember you as the passionate helpful developer who was putting in a good effort at a terrible company, they'll probably want to throw potential job opportunities your way.
And make sure they have a way to contact you, even if you are just making a connection on LinkedIn or something.
Finding good developers is hard, and companies love referrals. Those 3 senior devs that have quit likely found a job somewhere else, and that somewhere else will be hiring.
If they remember you as the passionate helpful developer who was putting in a good effort at a terrible company, they'll probably want to throw potential job opportunities your way.
And make sure they have a way to contact you, even if you are just making a connection on LinkedIn or something.
May be my experience would help you)
Have been in a similar role as you before.
Finished Uni, started my first, what I thought was a "major" job.
I was developer level there at the time, whereas the rest of the team was much more senior people who teched me up(very big thanks to them).
After about a year more senior people moved away from company.
Leaving myself as the only team member...
Following this, had to do most of the work and ridiculously enough do interviews to hire more senior people in my team... who would be hired based on my feedback ...
As well as that had opportunity to participate in company life and influence their main products as I see fit, use it as a playground.
This gave me tons of experience that I could hardly get at my level and age.
Very lucky for the company at the time I wanted for it to prosper, hence have tried to make it as good as I could.
Chance to learn and advance yourself.
P.S. left to a much more senior position in another company after surviving such a rhythm for few good years.
This gave me tons of experience that I could hardly get at my level and age.
Very lucky for the company at the time I wanted for it to prosper, hence have tried to make it as good as I could.
Chance to learn and advance yourself.
P.S. left to a much more senior position in another company after surviving such a rhythm for few good years.
Unless you really care about the product (technically challenging or high impact on society), find a smaller company or even a startup to work with.
If you're in PDT or MDT timezone, interested in working remote for a startup (higher risk, below-market-value pay, great mission, small team, challenging work), feel free to contact me and we can see what happens.
If you're in PDT or MDT timezone, interested in working remote for a startup (higher risk, below-market-value pay, great mission, small team, challenging work), feel free to contact me and we can see what happens.
You should definitely quit the company. Don't waste a lot of time there.
2 years back I quit the company to start freelancing, and sometimes when I look back - I regret wasting those valuable years of my life.
It feels like my situation just 2 years back. I stayed in such a company for 7 long years because of various reasons - but also because it got very comfortable - I had the option to do bad-to-mediocre work and no-one would question it, because everybody thought it was "great work". Three years into the company I had once complained to a new manager that most of the team did "mediocre work" and did not even take minuscule risks. The result was - the new manager put me into a PIP, ironically in a quarter when I was performing very good. She came to apologize a week later. But formally never cleared my name off PIP, instead marked me as a employee she cured on the HR records. That was cruel.
2 years back I quit the company to start freelancing, and sometimes when I look back - I regret wasting those valuable years of my life.
It feels like my situation just 2 years back. I stayed in such a company for 7 long years because of various reasons - but also because it got very comfortable - I had the option to do bad-to-mediocre work and no-one would question it, because everybody thought it was "great work". Three years into the company I had once complained to a new manager that most of the team did "mediocre work" and did not even take minuscule risks. The result was - the new manager put me into a PIP, ironically in a quarter when I was performing very good. She came to apologize a week later. But formally never cleared my name off PIP, instead marked me as a employee she cured on the HR records. That was cruel.
How do you find the freelancing stuff?
I get tired of having to deal with people pretty quickly so I'm a bit worried I couldn't do it.
I get tired of having to deal with people pretty quickly so I'm a bit worried I couldn't do it.
Don't just quit, the OP probably doesn't have the experience to go freelancing. He/she should apply for jobs while still earning an income, you have a better bargaining position that way.
What's PIP?
"Performance Improvement Plan".
The performance being improved is the validation of the execution of the decision to fire you which has in fact already been made.
http://www.employmentlawfirms.com/resources/employment/emplo...
The performance being improved is the validation of the execution of the decision to fire you which has in fact already been made.
http://www.employmentlawfirms.com/resources/employment/emplo...
Performance improvement plan. Typically the people in the lowest performance tier (based on manager ratings) will be offered such a plan.
[deleted]
It sounds like the perfect place for you is to work for a funded/profitable startup that has less than 20 people working in it. Preferably smaller.
It's really the only way you get to wear all the hats and solve lots of different problems in lots of technology domains and IMHO the best way to become a true full stack developer.
I can't tell you exactly how to find those types jobs, but I can tell you I've managed to over spend half of my 25 year career working in those types of companies.
Well maybe I do have some hints. I guess in the early days I did a lot of networking and going to events and meetups and such.
Then within the past 10 years I have started blogging and podcasting which exponentially increased my luck surface area and as a result a lot more opportunities come my way.
Anyway, best of luck with it!
It's really the only way you get to wear all the hats and solve lots of different problems in lots of technology domains and IMHO the best way to become a true full stack developer.
I can't tell you exactly how to find those types jobs, but I can tell you I've managed to over spend half of my 25 year career working in those types of companies.
Well maybe I do have some hints. I guess in the early days I did a lot of networking and going to events and meetups and such.
Then within the past 10 years I have started blogging and podcasting which exponentially increased my luck surface area and as a result a lot more opportunities come my way.
Anyway, best of luck with it!
> exponentially increased my luck surface area
I love this expression. Coincidentally I owe my current job to a blog post I made a few years ago, and I'm not even a prolific blogger.
I love this expression. Coincidentally I owe my current job to a blog post I made a few years ago, and I'm not even a prolific blogger.
I think I can comment on what people might be thinking when you show them your prototype: "will I have to maintain this?"
The only advice I can give is keep yourself available and keep looking for a job even if you want to work where you are at. It can't hurt to shop around.
The only advice I can give is keep yourself available and keep looking for a job even if you want to work where you are at. It can't hurt to shop around.
> I work at a large, non-software company...
Basic rule of thumb, the bigger the company-- the dumber and more dysfunctional they are. Also, Non-Software companies simply don't get devs.
Chalk this stint up to experience, prepare to move on.
Pro-tip, on your job search make sure you scorecard your next company for personal cultural fit. The ONLY way to determine this is by talking to actual members of the team you would work with. Here are some good areas to probe during your interview conversations > https://www.themuse.com/advice/the-best-interview-questions-...
Basic rule of thumb, the bigger the company-- the dumber and more dysfunctional they are. Also, Non-Software companies simply don't get devs.
Chalk this stint up to experience, prepare to move on.
Pro-tip, on your job search make sure you scorecard your next company for personal cultural fit. The ONLY way to determine this is by talking to actual members of the team you would work with. Here are some good areas to probe during your interview conversations > https://www.themuse.com/advice/the-best-interview-questions-...
Every place is different but what you are experiencing sounds somewhat typical of a large organization. It sounds like you would be much happier somewhere smaller! Small startups tend to have the opposite sorts of problems, where each person needs to take on lots of responsibility but consequently everyone gets to have a big impact on the company and product. And as long as they practice code reviews for all changes you're guaranteed to get feedback even if sometimes that feedback is just "that's gross, don't do that". Anyway at a smaller startup it should be way less likely for there to be the kind of disconnect between dev and management as you are describing.
I have been through very similar situations like yours during my early day jobs. It's that fire that we always had, fresh out of colleges and into the workforce, the drive to do good things, build cool stuff. Makes you very susceptible to be manipulated into doing more for free. If you think they pay well (just in certain pockets of the world anyway), the ROI from all that you do are multiples of what they gave you.
Here's the thing - your management know exactly what frustrated you and also know that it's the most efficient cost-cutting move, and it simply doesn't overlap with their interests to do something about it.
Here's the thing - your management know exactly what frustrated you and also know that it's the most efficient cost-cutting move, and it simply doesn't overlap with their interests to do something about it.
A couple random thoughts:
You've freelanced before, you're not happy with your current job, so consider getting back into that, at least on the side.
3 seniors quitting in a year does sound a bit like a red flag. Hopefully you're keeping in contact with them? Maybe you can find out why they left and where they went (and whether you can come along).
It's often unnecessarily large and undocumented. Sorry.
Consider running your ideas by some higher-ups before you spend your weekends on them. If they're not interested, maybe they could help you figure out things to work on that would get traction. This might be one of those trite old things where you make the person belivee it's their own good idea, but even then they'll at least know you were the one to implement it.
Things like code quality guidelines and interview processes involve some subjectivity- they're commendable things to want to improve but it may not be as simple as "boom, now it's better."
Not everyone loves talking about software for the sake of software. Maybe connect over biking or frisbee or movies or something. Also, "software" is a vast, vast space of topics. If someone doesn't happen to be in the right frame of mind when you bring up some otherwise-interesting topic, you probably will get blank stares. If you do want to chat about software, find a way to ask people about something you know they're working on.
I do hate the getting-things-done-in-meetings approach. You could try short-circuiting them with emails like "Here's problem X, here's my solution Y, please email me thoughts otherwise I'll go ahead and implemnt it." (YMMV)
In the end, though, it does sound like you're looking to leave. So, keep a list of your accomplishments (even if nobody there appreciates them), the responsibilites you have, positive feedback you've gotten, and things you've learned. Brush up your resume and look around. If you're financially stable, maybe just bail and go back to freelancing. Or, if you're feeling gutsy, maybe apply for a Sr role at your current place- that might be a way to gain some recognition.
3 seniors quitting in a year does sound a bit like a red flag. Hopefully you're keeping in contact with them? Maybe you can find out why they left and where they went (and whether you can come along).
It's often unnecessarily large and undocumented. Sorry.
Consider running your ideas by some higher-ups before you spend your weekends on them. If they're not interested, maybe they could help you figure out things to work on that would get traction. This might be one of those trite old things where you make the person belivee it's their own good idea, but even then they'll at least know you were the one to implement it.
Things like code quality guidelines and interview processes involve some subjectivity- they're commendable things to want to improve but it may not be as simple as "boom, now it's better."
Not everyone loves talking about software for the sake of software. Maybe connect over biking or frisbee or movies or something. Also, "software" is a vast, vast space of topics. If someone doesn't happen to be in the right frame of mind when you bring up some otherwise-interesting topic, you probably will get blank stares. If you do want to chat about software, find a way to ask people about something you know they're working on.
I do hate the getting-things-done-in-meetings approach. You could try short-circuiting them with emails like "Here's problem X, here's my solution Y, please email me thoughts otherwise I'll go ahead and implemnt it." (YMMV)
In the end, though, it does sound like you're looking to leave. So, keep a list of your accomplishments (even if nobody there appreciates them), the responsibilites you have, positive feedback you've gotten, and things you've learned. Brush up your resume and look around. If you're financially stable, maybe just bail and go back to freelancing. Or, if you're feeling gutsy, maybe apply for a Sr role at your current place- that might be a way to gain some recognition.
I think you could use a sizable attitude adjustment. The first thing to is to do your job. It's not clear from this lengthy post that you do that. Quit the politicking. Your 4th paragraph lists a bunch of things that sound like they don't matter a whole lot. Figure out how to work during the work week. Try to assume positive intent from your co-workers.
I guess in sum, start doing the opposite of your gut.
I guess in sum, start doing the opposite of your gut.
Peter Thiel has this funny law that states "A startup fucked at its foundation cannot be fixed".
I think we can generalise that and say that a company fixed its foundation also cannot be fixed.
Your post is the hallmark of a toxic work environment and no amount of work from you can fix that.
Get out as soon as possible.
No, this is not normal. You should quit.
Hi, I made an account just to respond to your essay. Congrats, you made me get out my laptop ;)
- Feedback is hard to come by. I don't know your company, but I've known several managers over the years who are excellent people, fantastic engineers in their own right, and decent at organizing projects... but they have no idea how to give constructive feedback. Sometimes this is a personality defect - software isn't known for attracting folks with high EQ - and also it's easier to not risk pissing people off. Sometimes they're guilty of apathy or oversubscription. I think you need a mentor, someone senior who will actually provide this feedback, and ideally who has visibility into the work you and your team perform. They will certainly have insight and perspective. I didn't realize how valuable this was until I started with my current manager, who gives excellent feedback, and I can't thank her enough for it.
- Work expands to fill the time allotted, but work also shifts to the person most willing. If you're pulling those kinds of hours and your team is not, then hey congrats, you're the kid in school who does all the work in group projects... so, presuming you're not okay with being that person... "Why would I promote you when you're carrying the team on your back?"
- "How tall you are depends on who you're standing next to." It's sadly common for a dev to have ten years' experience and not hold a candle to another with two years' experience. It depends on what they did in those years! Folks who aren't still hungry to learn, while still competent, cease to grow. So for evaluating your peers, do respect their years of seniority, but take it with a grain of salt that those years were well spent.
- "One must imagine Sisyphus happy." Camus said that, and while depressing, the quote sums up most of software development in a nutshell to me. You have to value the process - which it sounds like you do - but with the knowledge that your efforts will never make the problems go away. At best there will be new problems. At worst you'll be hamstrung by the situation around you, which leads to the next paragraph...
- "Every group of friends has That Guy. If yours doesn't, then congrats: YOU are That Guy." No matter the context, don't be That Guy. If your senior engineers are so amazing, you wouldn't be asking these questions: it would be painfully obvious to you that you can learn a ton from their experience and example. That is, unless you're very self-centered and narcissistic, which isn't meant as a dig so much as a "know thyself" moment. About the time that everyone learns from you, but you don't learn from them, and you're not just there for the money/etc... it's time to go.
- Culture comes from the top. ICs can't change the culture. At least not much, and likely not outside their team. It's just not how big orgs work. This should be part of the reason directors and VPs are so well compensated: it's on them to set the tone, establish the expectations, and conduct the hiring to enforce those. I personally know five ICs, off the top of my head, who all tried to change the culture, were unsuccessful, burned out, and quit. Find the serenity to accept that from your perspective the culture is immutable, and either accept it or change gigs.
- Yeah, final point: It's time to go. The usual career building advice applies, but I'd also focus on meetup groups. Everyone at a Golang meetup group, for instance, likes Go so much that they sacrifice personal time to hang with others who feel the same.
Feel free to reply if you'd like any further clarity. Good luck!
- Feedback is hard to come by. I don't know your company, but I've known several managers over the years who are excellent people, fantastic engineers in their own right, and decent at organizing projects... but they have no idea how to give constructive feedback. Sometimes this is a personality defect - software isn't known for attracting folks with high EQ - and also it's easier to not risk pissing people off. Sometimes they're guilty of apathy or oversubscription. I think you need a mentor, someone senior who will actually provide this feedback, and ideally who has visibility into the work you and your team perform. They will certainly have insight and perspective. I didn't realize how valuable this was until I started with my current manager, who gives excellent feedback, and I can't thank her enough for it.
- Work expands to fill the time allotted, but work also shifts to the person most willing. If you're pulling those kinds of hours and your team is not, then hey congrats, you're the kid in school who does all the work in group projects... so, presuming you're not okay with being that person... "Why would I promote you when you're carrying the team on your back?"
- "How tall you are depends on who you're standing next to." It's sadly common for a dev to have ten years' experience and not hold a candle to another with two years' experience. It depends on what they did in those years! Folks who aren't still hungry to learn, while still competent, cease to grow. So for evaluating your peers, do respect their years of seniority, but take it with a grain of salt that those years were well spent.
- "One must imagine Sisyphus happy." Camus said that, and while depressing, the quote sums up most of software development in a nutshell to me. You have to value the process - which it sounds like you do - but with the knowledge that your efforts will never make the problems go away. At best there will be new problems. At worst you'll be hamstrung by the situation around you, which leads to the next paragraph...
- "Every group of friends has That Guy. If yours doesn't, then congrats: YOU are That Guy." No matter the context, don't be That Guy. If your senior engineers are so amazing, you wouldn't be asking these questions: it would be painfully obvious to you that you can learn a ton from their experience and example. That is, unless you're very self-centered and narcissistic, which isn't meant as a dig so much as a "know thyself" moment. About the time that everyone learns from you, but you don't learn from them, and you're not just there for the money/etc... it's time to go.
- Culture comes from the top. ICs can't change the culture. At least not much, and likely not outside their team. It's just not how big orgs work. This should be part of the reason directors and VPs are so well compensated: it's on them to set the tone, establish the expectations, and conduct the hiring to enforce those. I personally know five ICs, off the top of my head, who all tried to change the culture, were unsuccessful, burned out, and quit. Find the serenity to accept that from your perspective the culture is immutable, and either accept it or change gigs.
- Yeah, final point: It's time to go. The usual career building advice applies, but I'd also focus on meetup groups. Everyone at a Golang meetup group, for instance, likes Go so much that they sacrifice personal time to hang with others who feel the same.
Feel free to reply if you'd like any further clarity. Good luck!
Wow! Thank you for all of the wonderful feedback and suggestions! This all seems like great advice, and I will be giving it a lot of thought over the coming weeks and months (...and years, probably). I don't feel quite as depressed, now!
Don't just think about it, but act on it! :)
I started my career at a very large insurance company in 2005 and for 9 months wrote no lines of code. I was documenting COBOL systems, sitting in disaster recovery planning meetings, all kinds of megacorp stuff that was soul crushing.
My next job, I was the only 'non-senior' on the team of about 12 that wrote all of the code that kept the manufacturing systems running for a very large international biomedical device manufacturer and since we were IT, we were on 24/7 pager duty.
Everyone from top to bottom at both companies were much like you describe- doing just enough to get by, punching the clock, and checked out. Not necessarily bad or dumb, but not necessarily good either.
Being a very outgoing person helped me stand out and I was never left out of meetings because I wasn't senior enough, either because I was lucky that these companies didn't do stuff like that, or because I was engaging enough for them to realize I may not have the title but I had the chops.
I've never again worked for a company that wasn't tech focused, and I've never again worked for a team that was a cost center (my teams made money from clients and we got treated better). The biggest company I've worked for since was 220, the smallest was 5.
As I've looked back on my path from Junior SD to Software Architect to running my own teams and companies I've realized two major things:
1) The megacorp stuff was god awfully boring and soul crushing. I connected with no one (I don't remember anyone I used to work with from those companies except maybe 2 people) but I was smart enough to pay attention to the good and bad things they did. From organization and procedure to inflexibility and beauracracy I was able to pick and choose some of the good habits up that you'd never get spending your career at startups.
2) If I would've stayed at either of those companies too long I would've burned out, or worse, gave up and stayed. It felt like being in an F1 car and having to drive in a school zone. I KNEW I could do cool stuff if I could find an outlet.
You seem to have the creativity and ambition to be very good at your craft and a company like this will squash it in the long run.
Make a list of things you think are good that they do (code reviews, mentoring, general procedural stuff, even if mundane). Make a list of things you think are stifling or dumb (old tech, no code reviews, 'senior' dev only meetings).
Use that list to make sure you're not going to get more of the same at the next company.
If you don't mind client work and love variety look for teams that do professional services work (like implementations for a software product/service company) or an agency (you'll get every variation of good bad and ugly there).
If client work or agency life is too stressful (and it can be FOR SURE) get on a product or service team.
You're still young enough I wouldn't recommend going to too small of a team/company too fast.
I see a lot of startup Cowboys that are good at rapid prototyping but are shit at developing something maintainable. There is a very happy medium between knowing when to go Cowboy and when to play it safe- if you do that you'll always be in demand.
The caveat to that is that I've seen big companies and big teams with awful procedures (or none) and I've seen 4 person teams that had a great workflow and process and shipped quality work fast and without very many issues.
The medium sized teams and companies seem to be a good middle ground of being visible, able to affect change, and having enough other people to lean on and learn from without getting brushed off because everyone is running 1000 mi/HR and has no time.
My next job, I was the only 'non-senior' on the team of about 12 that wrote all of the code that kept the manufacturing systems running for a very large international biomedical device manufacturer and since we were IT, we were on 24/7 pager duty.
Everyone from top to bottom at both companies were much like you describe- doing just enough to get by, punching the clock, and checked out. Not necessarily bad or dumb, but not necessarily good either.
Being a very outgoing person helped me stand out and I was never left out of meetings because I wasn't senior enough, either because I was lucky that these companies didn't do stuff like that, or because I was engaging enough for them to realize I may not have the title but I had the chops.
I've never again worked for a company that wasn't tech focused, and I've never again worked for a team that was a cost center (my teams made money from clients and we got treated better). The biggest company I've worked for since was 220, the smallest was 5.
As I've looked back on my path from Junior SD to Software Architect to running my own teams and companies I've realized two major things:
1) The megacorp stuff was god awfully boring and soul crushing. I connected with no one (I don't remember anyone I used to work with from those companies except maybe 2 people) but I was smart enough to pay attention to the good and bad things they did. From organization and procedure to inflexibility and beauracracy I was able to pick and choose some of the good habits up that you'd never get spending your career at startups.
2) If I would've stayed at either of those companies too long I would've burned out, or worse, gave up and stayed. It felt like being in an F1 car and having to drive in a school zone. I KNEW I could do cool stuff if I could find an outlet.
You seem to have the creativity and ambition to be very good at your craft and a company like this will squash it in the long run.
Make a list of things you think are good that they do (code reviews, mentoring, general procedural stuff, even if mundane). Make a list of things you think are stifling or dumb (old tech, no code reviews, 'senior' dev only meetings).
Use that list to make sure you're not going to get more of the same at the next company.
If you don't mind client work and love variety look for teams that do professional services work (like implementations for a software product/service company) or an agency (you'll get every variation of good bad and ugly there).
If client work or agency life is too stressful (and it can be FOR SURE) get on a product or service team.
You're still young enough I wouldn't recommend going to too small of a team/company too fast.
I see a lot of startup Cowboys that are good at rapid prototyping but are shit at developing something maintainable. There is a very happy medium between knowing when to go Cowboy and when to play it safe- if you do that you'll always be in demand.
The caveat to that is that I've seen big companies and big teams with awful procedures (or none) and I've seen 4 person teams that had a great workflow and process and shipped quality work fast and without very many issues.
The medium sized teams and companies seem to be a good middle ground of being visible, able to affect change, and having enough other people to lean on and learn from without getting brushed off because everyone is running 1000 mi/HR and has no time.
Get out of there.
[deleted]
Life is too short to be unhappy with anything, anyone, etc; so make a change. Here is a list of criteria I have gathered over the past 20 years in tech on finding the right fit. It doesn't have to apply to just software/technology jobs.
1 - Is software/technology the company's main source of revenue?
This is my top-most question, because I have been an engineer in several organizations where software/technology wasn't their primary concern and it sucks for lots of reasons. All of the reasons funnel back to this question. It makes economic sense that if you're an engineer at a law firm (as an example), you are not the organization's primary concern because you likely do not contribute to the organization's primary source of revenue: litigation. This will have all kinds of downsides to it: lack of training whether from budget constraints or a lack of mentors; lack of advancement on the right things to match a thriving career in software/tech; a lack of pay.
2 - Does the company make software/technology for the right reasons?
This might be a stickler for lots of other HN readers, but I have made an effort to stay away from tech companies who participate in the supply chains of industries that I take up issue with. Example: I'm not fond of war for any reason, so working for a defense contractor is out of the question. Even when the sales pitch sounds great, I still look at whether I'll be able to sleep at night knowing I'm making a contribution to the things I care about.
3 - Does the initial environment suit me?
I emphasis the word, 'initial', because this will change as all environments do... Even at the few companies I have found over the years, they all changed in ways that communicated to me, it was time to move on. People, politics, mergers, acquisitions, lack of new opportunity, etc- The landscape will forever be changing so find your tolerance level for the changes you can handle and work with it, not against it.
4 - Check in with yourself frequently and ask yourself, "Do I still love what I'm working on?" and be willing to make positive changes if the answer is no. 'Knowing thyself' is some of the oldest philosophical wisdom and for good reason. You will continue to jump from one circumstance to another if you don't truly know what does make you happy. I spent years trying to climb the corporate ladder and realized that I'm not cut out for management, but I like being a leader. One can be a leader anywhere... with or without followers, subordinates, etc. Besides most people love and respect leaders, while despise and tolerate managers.
You will feel like you made mistakes and bad decisions along the way, but this is normal growth. Just keep focusing on what brings you happiness.
1 - Is software/technology the company's main source of revenue?
This is my top-most question, because I have been an engineer in several organizations where software/technology wasn't their primary concern and it sucks for lots of reasons. All of the reasons funnel back to this question. It makes economic sense that if you're an engineer at a law firm (as an example), you are not the organization's primary concern because you likely do not contribute to the organization's primary source of revenue: litigation. This will have all kinds of downsides to it: lack of training whether from budget constraints or a lack of mentors; lack of advancement on the right things to match a thriving career in software/tech; a lack of pay.
2 - Does the company make software/technology for the right reasons?
This might be a stickler for lots of other HN readers, but I have made an effort to stay away from tech companies who participate in the supply chains of industries that I take up issue with. Example: I'm not fond of war for any reason, so working for a defense contractor is out of the question. Even when the sales pitch sounds great, I still look at whether I'll be able to sleep at night knowing I'm making a contribution to the things I care about.
3 - Does the initial environment suit me?
I emphasis the word, 'initial', because this will change as all environments do... Even at the few companies I have found over the years, they all changed in ways that communicated to me, it was time to move on. People, politics, mergers, acquisitions, lack of new opportunity, etc- The landscape will forever be changing so find your tolerance level for the changes you can handle and work with it, not against it.
4 - Check in with yourself frequently and ask yourself, "Do I still love what I'm working on?" and be willing to make positive changes if the answer is no. 'Knowing thyself' is some of the oldest philosophical wisdom and for good reason. You will continue to jump from one circumstance to another if you don't truly know what does make you happy. I spent years trying to climb the corporate ladder and realized that I'm not cut out for management, but I like being a leader. One can be a leader anywhere... with or without followers, subordinates, etc. Besides most people love and respect leaders, while despise and tolerate managers.
You will feel like you made mistakes and bad decisions along the way, but this is normal growth. Just keep focusing on what brings you happiness.
I like the rule of thumb when there's no one left to learn from in your job, time to move on.
Obviously don't quit, but you could start looking. Even if it's not implemented you have created new systems for your company ;)
But remember what you want is not necessarily what others in the org you are in wants.
Some people just want a easy job. It's not a crazy idea, if the company is not benefiting those who go the extra mile, why do it? Some people value life outside work more. And this certainly shifts a lot as you get older. Why work hard to make widget company A better than competition widget company B?
Level up jobwise, put you energy into a side project(part time self employment) or keep trying if it's important to you, maybe it's more complicated than it seems.
Obviously don't quit, but you could start looking. Even if it's not implemented you have created new systems for your company ;)
But remember what you want is not necessarily what others in the org you are in wants.
Some people just want a easy job. It's not a crazy idea, if the company is not benefiting those who go the extra mile, why do it? Some people value life outside work more. And this certainly shifts a lot as you get older. Why work hard to make widget company A better than competition widget company B?
Level up jobwise, put you energy into a side project(part time self employment) or keep trying if it's important to you, maybe it's more complicated than it seems.
We moved the text from http://pastebin.com/raw/8sdGRra3 to the text field above. It's longer than Ask HN texts are usually supposed to be, but given that there's an active discussion it seems more convenient to have it here. If there are objections, we can put it back the way it was.
Leave for a two weeks vacation and come back to the ruins of the project. Then, apply for senior position. If rejected, quit and find a better gig. You will not get a senior position nor raise/praise for what you are doing right now.
But generally, your company sounds like a pretty standard fortune500 crap tier outfit (IBM, Citi, Ericsson, Tata, etc). I suggest you find a better company or position within the company. Move teams if possible. If not, just leave. Don't stick to places like these. I did. I wasted my time.
But generally, your company sounds like a pretty standard fortune500 crap tier outfit (IBM, Citi, Ericsson, Tata, etc). I suggest you find a better company or position within the company. Move teams if possible. If not, just leave. Don't stick to places like these. I did. I wasted my time.
You are at a company where people are not interested nor invested in the work they are doing: they are there for the paycheck, they resigned themselves to the situation, you are likely viewed as "green and fresh out of college, you'll learn yet", and the situation is hopeless.
I worked at a place like that. And it was a software company. And it was my second time working there. After I realized that the company deteriorated far more than I had anticipated in my absence (and I did anticipate it), I quit the place the first chance I got, and never regretted it.
Generally if you love working with computers, you have to give up working with them professionally, because today's computer work is nothing like the work of old: too much politics and management meddling, too few people who actually care about doing things correctly, or about working with computers at all, for that matter.
For most people working with computers today (and I even experienced this first hand working in Silicon Valley), working in this type of a job is just means to get above average pay, or decent pay, just like for most people an automobile is something that gets one from point a to point b, instead of this incredible machine which can put together economy, performance, and design all in one.
I worked at a place like that. And it was a software company. And it was my second time working there. After I realized that the company deteriorated far more than I had anticipated in my absence (and I did anticipate it), I quit the place the first chance I got, and never regretted it.
Generally if you love working with computers, you have to give up working with them professionally, because today's computer work is nothing like the work of old: too much politics and management meddling, too few people who actually care about doing things correctly, or about working with computers at all, for that matter.
For most people working with computers today (and I even experienced this first hand working in Silicon Valley), working in this type of a job is just means to get above average pay, or decent pay, just like for most people an automobile is something that gets one from point a to point b, instead of this incredible machine which can put together economy, performance, and design all in one.
Find another job, but don't quit, as it makes salary negotiation much harder. Do the interviews in the background. Also if some engineer you worked with has left the company, ask him to help find job for you.
Just copy paste this to the CEO and see what happens. (minus the self-deprecation)
Bad idea IMO, he's still very inexperienced and thus likely to not be taken seriously even if he's right.
In my organization at this company, each team is assigned one senior engineer, one or more non-senior engineers, and one or more offshore engineers. On my team, I am the only non-senior engineer, in addition to half a dozen offshore engineers. In the ~12 months that I've been on my team, 3 senior engineers have joined and subsequently quit, which has left me to learn the ropes of our (unnecessarily large and often undocumented) application and manage all of our offshore engineers on my own.
This means that I usually work significantly more than 8 hours per day (8 hours is the norm at my company). Lately, this also means that I'm usually quite a bit more familiar with our application than the senior engineer on my team. This has led to a number of hilarious situations in which I am at my desk, IM'ing the senior engineer what he needs to say at meetings, as those meetings are happening. I can't attend these meetings, because they're only for senior engineers!
Because I generally have no time to write code or do anything other than write e-mails and put out fires during the work week, I spend a large part of my weekends writing code for prototypes and projects, thinking about the designs of various parts of the company's application, improving our documentation, writing code quality guides, and coming up with various process improvements (e.g. ways to improve our source control policies, ways that we can improve our interview process, etc). When I show other people (engineers on other teams, management, etc) what I've worked on, I generally don't get any response whatsoever. This is problematic, because I need management to sign off on any changes that I make to our code-base or any of our processes, and without their sign-off, my work basically goes to waste. It's alright if none of my ideas get implemented -- they might be bad ideas (in hindsight, I know that some of them are!) -- but it would at least be nice to get some feedback, and I never get any.
To make matters worse, management doesn't seem to be aware of any of this. My manager has suggested that I try to take on more tasks at the next job-level up from mine, when by the company's own guidelines, I've been doing the job of a senior engineer for some time now (though I probably haven't been doing as well at it as an actual senior engineer would). I will admit that I haven't been doing an great job of making myself "visible" to management, but I think that I've been doing enough that they should have more awareness than they seem to have.
Other than that, I just can't seem to connect with anyone at work. I try to have conversations with other engineers about software (I've tried a wide variety of topics), and am generally greeted with head-nodding and a blank stare -- sometimes other engineers even make impolite comments about my interest in software. I've tried to organize meetings where we can discuss computer science topics, but management, while supportive of the idea, has warned me that there might not be enough interest to warrant having such meetings.
The general M.O. here seems to be to do just enough work to shift responsibility to someone else, to be Agile (with a capital "A") even though our organization is anything but, to schedule meetings (never try to solve a problem using automation -- meetings are the only way), and to basically maintain the status quo, even when doing so means making bad decisions that will cost the company big time in the future. By the way, it's not cool to think or converse in terms of abstractions -- only speak in terms of APIs, please (paraphrased advice that I've been given by management).
I've been trying to make the best of things: the attitude I've tried to have over the past year has been that if I can identify various things that we do wrong at work, and can come up with better ways to do them, then it's almost as good as working somewhere where things actually get done in the right way. Still, I'm unhappy. For the first time in my life, I feel like I might be depressed. I don't like waking up for work in the morning, and on the weekend, all I can think about is how much the next week is going to suck.
It seems like this should be a really sweet job -- after all, you can do what is essentially bad work and still get paid, the environment is laid back, and people are friendly, for the most part. But it's actually really frustrating. It feels like no matter how hard I try, I'll never make any improvements to the company's situation, because our organization in the company is structured in such a way that one single person (at my job-level, at least) can't really affect any change by him/herself. Thus it feels like the only way to proceed is to knowingly do bad work.
Am I expecting too much? Is this just how software engineering is? I'm grateful to have a job, and don't mean to be a know-it-all. I know that my company doesn't owe me anything more than a paycheck, but I just don't feel like this is a good situation. I've talked about some of this with management, and the response has basically been "That must be frustrating." I don't know many other software engineers, and didn't do CS in college, so can't reach out to classmates or professors for advice.
Please, HN, set me straight!