Wine Wayland Driver(gitlab.winehq.org)
gitlab.winehq.org
Wine Wayland Driver
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/2275
106 comments
>For reference I'm using sway. swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not. You're supposed to create your own scripts around it that handles ac connect and disconnects.
>One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it.
If you're not a fan of making scripts then sway (and wlsunset I assume) is not for you. My sway install is held together by a myriad of scripts - keybindings are handled by a script, starting programs via bemenu goes through a script, sway itself is started by a script, etc. That's just how this compositor and its ecosystem are designed - they're for people who want the software itself to do the smallest possible thing with the least possible assumptions so that the user can do whatever they want to fill in the rest.
>One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it.
If you're not a fan of making scripts then sway (and wlsunset I assume) is not for you. My sway install is held together by a myriad of scripts - keybindings are handled by a script, starting programs via bemenu goes through a script, sway itself is started by a script, etc. That's just how this compositor and its ecosystem are designed - they're for people who want the software itself to do the smallest possible thing with the least possible assumptions so that the user can do whatever they want to fill in the rest.
The problem isn’t that it’s held together by individual scripts and apps that one can replace or hack at. The problem is that none of these pieces ship in place.
Ideally you’d have some sort of offering that gives you a reasonable starting place with all these composable pieces in place, and then you can hack/replace/add/remove as needed.
Everyone starting from scratch doesn’t make sense. It’s like shipping a Unix system with no app doing it’s own paging because the devs rightly expect you to use some other tool to page output for you, but there’s no less/more installed (and no back buffer in the terminal or terminal emulator to boot). Then you complain and the answer is that you’re supposed to write your own (or research, download, compile, and install something someone else might have hacked up).
Ideally you’d have some sort of offering that gives you a reasonable starting place with all these composable pieces in place, and then you can hack/replace/add/remove as needed.
Everyone starting from scratch doesn’t make sense. It’s like shipping a Unix system with no app doing it’s own paging because the devs rightly expect you to use some other tool to page output for you, but there’s no less/more installed (and no back buffer in the terminal or terminal emulator to boot). Then you complain and the answer is that you’re supposed to write your own (or research, download, compile, and install something someone else might have hacked up).
> The problem is that none of these pieces ship in place.
Sway is not a desktop environment. What you are describing is a desktop environment. I too would like a sway-based desktop environment. Let's stop complaining that sway is not what it is or that somehow this is related to wayland. This whole thing is just a consequence that writing cohesive graphical/desktop software is tedious and that tinkerers cannot rely on the myriad of Xorg desktop environment, in particular the modular ones like lxde/xfce to mix and match components.
> Then you complain and the answer is that you’re supposed to write your own
Yes, obviously. No-one is saying this would be a bad project. And if you blatantly misunderstand their project's scope it's no wonder you're getting dry responses.
Sway is not a desktop environment. What you are describing is a desktop environment. I too would like a sway-based desktop environment. Let's stop complaining that sway is not what it is or that somehow this is related to wayland. This whole thing is just a consequence that writing cohesive graphical/desktop software is tedious and that tinkerers cannot rely on the myriad of Xorg desktop environment, in particular the modular ones like lxde/xfce to mix and match components.
> Then you complain and the answer is that you’re supposed to write your own
Yes, obviously. No-one is saying this would be a bad project. And if you blatantly misunderstand their project's scope it's no wonder you're getting dry responses.
I think gp and gggp are arguing that the diffusion of responsibility means that nothing takes responsibility for baseline functionality, and as such there are huge gaps.
With X all these things are in X or the single shared X compositor itself. Yes, it's bloated and sometimes lacks flexibility in configuration or doesn't work perfectly, but there's no gaps.
I don't think the author is saying these individual projects should do these things, but if they don't, who does? It means that everyone using wayland effectively is using dwm, and dwm isn't for everyone (or even most people?). It feels like you're saying users should suck it up and learn to love the dwm philosophy, C and all, which doesn't seem quite right to me.
With X all these things are in X or the single shared X compositor itself. Yes, it's bloated and sometimes lacks flexibility in configuration or doesn't work perfectly, but there's no gaps.
I don't think the author is saying these individual projects should do these things, but if they don't, who does? It means that everyone using wayland effectively is using dwm, and dwm isn't for everyone (or even most people?). It feels like you're saying users should suck it up and learn to love the dwm philosophy, C and all, which doesn't seem quite right to me.
In practice, Linux distributions have been the system integrators that pull these things together and handle the gaps. That's really the value of a distribution - pulls a set of components together in a way that works.
In this case, I use Fedora (Gnome). Most things are on Wayland and it works pretty well.
In this case, I use Fedora (Gnome). Most things are on Wayland and it works pretty well.
I am not saying sway isn’t allowed to do what they did. But the normal approach is for the 1st party dev to also provide reference implementations of supporting/complementing utilities to smooth adoption.
No one is saying they have to be shipped as part of the compositor, obviously.
No one is saying they have to be shipped as part of the compositor, obviously.
> But the normal approach...
Says who? You're getting software for free, from someone who is not beholden to you for anything. Either you accept it as it is, or you fix it; that's the nature of open source. Whining about it on the internet is rude and disrespectful.
If you can't be bothered, and want all this stuff included, or at the very least recommended or installed automatically on the side, switch to something else that does that for you.
The alternative to taking a piece of open source as-is isn't "complain to the maintainer until they fulfill your wishes". That kind of thing is why open source maintainers burn out. You are not entitled to anything from them; the alternative is that the software doesn't exist at all.
Says who? You're getting software for free, from someone who is not beholden to you for anything. Either you accept it as it is, or you fix it; that's the nature of open source. Whining about it on the internet is rude and disrespectful.
If you can't be bothered, and want all this stuff included, or at the very least recommended or installed automatically on the side, switch to something else that does that for you.
The alternative to taking a piece of open source as-is isn't "complain to the maintainer until they fulfill your wishes". That kind of thing is why open source maintainers burn out. You are not entitled to anything from them; the alternative is that the software doesn't exist at all.
It is not the normal approach for a project author to write a whole ecosystem.
If you want the Desktop Environment experience, pick a Desktop Environment. This can be based on sway (e.g. Manjaro spins), but sway is not more a desktop Environment than the Linux kernel is an operating system.
If you want the Desktop Environment experience, pick a Desktop Environment. This can be based on sway (e.g. Manjaro spins), but sway is not more a desktop Environment than the Linux kernel is an operating system.
I don't see how being "just a compositor" has to do anything to "has to bundle complementing utilities", without mucking the whole thing and turning it into a desktop environment.
Thought I agree that for most people, a desktop environment, "everything integrated, just change this specific thing" instead of "let me just DIY my entire environment from those separated parts" makes more sense.
Thought I agree that for most people, a desktop environment, "everything integrated, just change this specific thing" instead of "let me just DIY my entire environment from those separated parts" makes more sense.
afaik there are various distros that will give you a preconfigured out of the box swaywm based desktop env. Garuda linux comes to mind.
The sway wiki is pretty detailed and iirc has a helpful page full of options for various "not the compositor's job" tasks like notification daemon, app launcher, etc.
The sway wiki is pretty detailed and iirc has a helpful page full of options for various "not the compositor's job" tasks like notification daemon, app launcher, etc.
The reason why Chrome and Electron still need a flag is simple: Chrome still has a decent chunk of work to do before Wayland is supported to the same degree as X11. They had a lot of false starts: it took years before Wayland support actually got upstreamed in any regard.
Likewise for Electron. It does generally work to the point of daily-driver usability today with stable Chrome and Electron, but some apps are shipping old and out-of-support versions of Electron, so unfortunately it has become a bit of a waiting game.
Anyways, you can't actually do proper DPI virtualization for X11 apps because afaik there is no protocol for apps to communicate the scale that they are actually rendering at, so there will never be full support for mixed or fractional DPI in XWayland to the same degree that it is supported in Wayland. I'm not 100% sure there would be a point to making such a protocol at this point, since blurry-but-correct surfaces seems like an OK trade-off to keep things working in the long term. If you run real X11 with mixed DPI or fractional DPI, you get quite a range of potential failure cases depending on what apps you run.
At this point most of my screen is filled with native Wayland apps, and Electron apps that use reasonably up-to-date Electron (like VS Code), so it's rare to see a blurry window.
Anyways, you can't actually do proper DPI virtualization for X11 apps because afaik there is no protocol for apps to communicate the scale that they are actually rendering at, so there will never be full support for mixed or fractional DPI in XWayland to the same degree that it is supported in Wayland. I'm not 100% sure there would be a point to making such a protocol at this point, since blurry-but-correct surfaces seems like an OK trade-off to keep things working in the long term. If you run real X11 with mixed DPI or fractional DPI, you get quite a range of potential failure cases depending on what apps you run.
At this point most of my screen is filled with native Wayland apps, and Electron apps that use reasonably up-to-date Electron (like VS Code), so it's rare to see a blurry window.
> Chrome still has a decent chunk of work to do before Wayland is supported to the same degree as X11.
I'm not doubting you, but given that ChromeOS uses Wayland I'm very confused by this.
I'm not doubting you, but given that ChromeOS uses Wayland I'm very confused by this.
ChromeOS uses Wayland as a bridge between Android and Chrome because it's a politically neutral technology neither of them control, and thus can both agree on implementing. It's not about integrating better with other Wayland compositors or the wider Wayland/Linux ecosystem, it's about using Wayland as a piece of technology to sling buffers back and forth between two different camps who are otherwise on bad terms.
ChromeOS implements a Wayland compositor to support Android apps running as Wayland clients. Chrome being a well-behaved Wayland client is something completely different.
ChromeOS implements a Wayland compositor to support Android apps running as Wayland clients. Chrome being a well-behaved Wayland client is something completely different.
I'm not familiar with the situation, but my guess would be that ChromeOS has created its own Wayland compositor with a bunch of private protocol extensions that Chrome on ChromeOS uses to get stuff done. But for some reason or another, those protocol extensions are not suitable for submitting as new public extensions for other compositors to implement. Or they are suitable for submission, but the official extension roadmap already has different extensions in the works (but not yet complete) that will do the same thing.
Yep, ChromeOS basically has Chrome itself as the compositor, so it doesn't have to worry about running "under" Wayland at all.
Take a look at the "blocked on" to see the kinds of things still remaining:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=578890
Take a look at the "blocked on" to see the kinds of things still remaining:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=578890
> Chrome still has a decent chunk of work to do before Wayland is supported to the same degree as X11
Do you have any examples? I used ms teams in chrome yesterday, and it seemed to work fine with webcam and screen sharing.
Do you have any examples? I used ms teams in chrome yesterday, and it seemed to work fine with webcam and screen sharing.
Upstream Chrome bugs are here:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=578890
Electron has different issues it's been working on, though. I believe it has some issues with window border rendering in some cases as well as issues with cursor size on fractional scale.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=578890
Electron has different issues it's been working on, though. I believe it has some issues with window border rendering in some cases as well as issues with cursor size on fractional scale.
Thankfully most of those are closed... maybe if we're lucky we'll see official support this year.
Everybody using MS Teams on a modern Linux distro must have enabled this option at some point. Otherwise you can’t screen share.
Given the recent 3 years since pandemic, that should provided ample of time and test data for stabilization.
Given the recent 3 years since pandemic, that should provided ample of time and test data for stabilization.
If you want full desktop integration why are you using sway. Most of the functionality you're talking about requires writing scripts if you used i3 or awesome WM on X11 as well so has nothing to do with wayland.
Regarding exiting and restarting a wayland session, how do you do it? GDM, the console? It obviously works for most other people so it seems you're encountering a bug related to your hardware or setup so you could file a bug report with the appropriate project (again doesn't really seem like a wayland issue though).
Regarding exiting and restarting a wayland session, how do you do it? GDM, the console? It obviously works for most other people so it seems you're encountering a bug related to your hardware or setup so you could file a bug report with the appropriate project (again doesn't really seem like a wayland issue though).
> For reference I'm using sway. swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not. You're supposed to create your own scripts around it that handles ac connect and disconnects.
> There's a tool to do flux like color warmth setting. One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it. The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
I used to write little tools like his and my ~/bin is still littered with scripts from 10 years ago
Nowadays I want this functionality to work by default and I won't settle for a less usable system
> There's a tool to do flux like color warmth setting. One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it. The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
I used to write little tools like his and my ~/bin is still littered with scripts from 10 years ago
Nowadays I want this functionality to work by default and I won't settle for a less usable system
> And then so many things seem to follow the "unix functionality" and as a result they're half baked tools that aren't really working properly IMHO.
I'm going to disagree pretty strongly with that. In fact, I think most of its problems are that it threw the Unix philosophy out the window. While it's true that it suffers from having made everything a implementation detail that can theoretically be plugged in with a different component, the problem is that they forced everything important to go through the compositor, which bottlenecks composiblilty and doesn't allow you to actually replace individual components without support from the (usually incomplete) monolith in the middle.
I'm going to disagree pretty strongly with that. In fact, I think most of its problems are that it threw the Unix philosophy out the window. While it's true that it suffers from having made everything a implementation detail that can theoretically be plugged in with a different component, the problem is that they forced everything important to go through the compositor, which bottlenecks composiblilty and doesn't allow you to actually replace individual components without support from the (usually incomplete) monolith in the middle.
As opposed to the single, so-huge-that-nvidia-ships-binary-blobs-for-it xserver implementation?
Yes, actually; the X server was awful, but it was a single contained point of awfulness that allowed everything else to be trivially interoperable. Breaking that apart could have been good except that the way they actually did it mixed far too many concerns into the graphical server (compositor), so while we have more of them, in practice you can't actually mix and match the rest of the system anymore.
It is a display protocol, responsible for displaying things. A compositor is a must for that, it is not additional complexity at all.
What you would want to mix is a window manager, and there is no reason why that can’t be done with this model (and is pretty much what wlroots does).
But I do agree that a cathedral model can have benefits.
What you would want to mix is a window manager, and there is no reason why that can’t be done with this model (and is pretty much what wlroots does).
But I do agree that a cathedral model can have benefits.
Not sure what you mean; wlroots still assumes that the window manager and compositor is in the same process. Wayland itself assumes that those things are also in the same process as the display protocol/server.
With X11, if someone wanted to write a window manager, they could do that and only that, without having to write a compositor or display server. Wlroots certainly simplifies those latter two bits, but there's still a lot of work to do to use it.
Beyond that, Wayland's mess of extension protocols are generally incomplete. I've been working on "porting" parts of Xfce to Wayland, and there are a significant number of things that just cannot be done at all right now without integrating it directly into the compositor process. The extension protocols necessary to do even a fraction of this table-stakes stuff are often experimental or non-standard, and even when they do exist, are often missing critical pieces.
As an example: say you want to write a dock-type app that only shows the list of toplevel windows present on the current workspace (and when you switch workspaces, it'll show the windows on the new workspace). Nope, you can't do it. The workspace protocol itself has been languishing in Freedesktop GitLab[0] for two and a half years, and even if that was standardized, it doesn't interact with the Foreign Toplevel protocol at all, so you have no idea what windows are on which workspaces.
So currently the only solution is: your dock app has to live in the same process as the compositor, where it has access to all the compositor-specific data around workspaces and windows. (Sure, you could build a d-bus interface, or something like that, but that would be specific to your one compositor... and a d-bus interface is the moral equivalent of a Wayland protocol, which is what you should be using anyway.)
[0] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/m...
With X11, if someone wanted to write a window manager, they could do that and only that, without having to write a compositor or display server. Wlroots certainly simplifies those latter two bits, but there's still a lot of work to do to use it.
Beyond that, Wayland's mess of extension protocols are generally incomplete. I've been working on "porting" parts of Xfce to Wayland, and there are a significant number of things that just cannot be done at all right now without integrating it directly into the compositor process. The extension protocols necessary to do even a fraction of this table-stakes stuff are often experimental or non-standard, and even when they do exist, are often missing critical pieces.
As an example: say you want to write a dock-type app that only shows the list of toplevel windows present on the current workspace (and when you switch workspaces, it'll show the windows on the new workspace). Nope, you can't do it. The workspace protocol itself has been languishing in Freedesktop GitLab[0] for two and a half years, and even if that was standardized, it doesn't interact with the Foreign Toplevel protocol at all, so you have no idea what windows are on which workspaces.
So currently the only solution is: your dock app has to live in the same process as the compositor, where it has access to all the compositor-specific data around workspaces and windows. (Sure, you could build a d-bus interface, or something like that, but that would be specific to your one compositor... and a d-bus interface is the moral equivalent of a Wayland protocol, which is what you should be using anyway.)
[0] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/m...
> It is a display protocol, responsible for displaying things. A compositor is a must for that
Er, are we using different meanings? Obviously something has to display pixels, but I literally do run X without a compositor.
> a window manager, and there is no reason why that can’t be done with this model (and is pretty much what wlroots does).
No, you can't (excepting rootfull xwayland, obviously), Wayland forces the display server, compositor, and window manager to be a single program. All wlroots does is make it easier to write that compositor, it hardly changes the model.
Er, are we using different meanings? Obviously something has to display pixels, but I literally do run X without a compositor.
> a window manager, and there is no reason why that can’t be done with this model (and is pretty much what wlroots does).
No, you can't (excepting rootfull xwayland, obviously), Wayland forces the display server, compositor, and window manager to be a single program. All wlroots does is make it easier to write that compositor, it hardly changes the model.
> but I literally do run X without a compositor
The price is tearing. Which may not be too noticeable at 1920@60fps, but playing a video on a bigger screen at higher refresh rate will very very seriously tear. It is not an accident that every other OS is compositor-only.
> Wayland forces the display server, compositor, and window manager to be a single program
Only the first two. You can allow a third-party program to control your windows’ state via any IPC mechanism you choose.
The price is tearing. Which may not be too noticeable at 1920@60fps, but playing a video on a bigger screen at higher refresh rate will very very seriously tear. It is not an accident that every other OS is compositor-only.
> Wayland forces the display server, compositor, and window manager to be a single program
Only the first two. You can allow a third-party program to control your windows’ state via any IPC mechanism you choose.
Sure, there are trade offs in skipping the compositor. But the claim was:
> It is a display protocol, responsible for displaying things. A compositor is a must for that, it is not additional complexity at all.
Which is just false; a compositor isn't a must unless you move the goalposts beyond "displaying things".
> You can allow a third-party program to control your windows’ state via any IPC mechanism you choose.
I guess you could, by adding a lot of API surface; has literally anyone ever done this, or is it just a hypothetical solution? Because I'm not aware of any existing compositor that lets you plug in a window manager.
> It is a display protocol, responsible for displaying things. A compositor is a must for that, it is not additional complexity at all.
Which is just false; a compositor isn't a must unless you move the goalposts beyond "displaying things".
> You can allow a third-party program to control your windows’ state via any IPC mechanism you choose.
I guess you could, by adding a lot of API surface; has literally anyone ever done this, or is it just a hypothetical solution? Because I'm not aware of any existing compositor that lets you plug in a window manager.
Wayland compositors have provisions for skipping the compositing part when a single client is running full screen. So, by your argument, Wayland is also "not a compositor".
I don't think that follows. You can run a fully-functional X session, with an arbitrary number of windows, without any compositing. It's not some special case reluctantly added after people pointed out that the initial "you must fully double-buffer every single pixel every single time" wasn't actually universally a good idea. But even at face value... okay, so you'd like to extend the argument to say that not even Wayland actually forces you to composite? Because that's agreeing with my argument, just more strongly.
Except that nearly everything that makes the usual years-out-of-date Wayland gripe lists here are ALL specified protocols now, it's just a matter of time until they're implemented widely enough to put this to rest.
Fractional scaling, hotkeys, gamma control, screen capture, etc, all have protocols.
Fractional scaling, hotkeys, gamma control, screen capture, etc, all have protocols.
I don't believe that this will happen in practice in any event. First, implementations have... let's say personality conflicts? That is, I would be shocked if GNOME replaces its screenshot protocol with the "standard" any time soon. Second, even when it's true it requires every single compositor to actually connect all the bits up. For instance, I don't use QWERTY if I can help it. So a little while back, I tried a new compositor that was based on wlroots, which supports changing keyboard layouts. Guess what I couldn't do, because that specific compositor hadn't gotten to plumbing that specific feature through? Guess what works on every single X11 window manager, no matter how barebones, because X11 can manage separation of concerns?
hdr is still mia
It's just early. It's fast to make little scripts and glue it together yourself, and until folks really enumerate use cases and build to meet them, it's going to feel unfinished. It takes years to build out a big project like this.
If you want "just works", stick to X and a mature desktop environment like KDE or Gnome for now (especially if you do any gaming).
If you want "just works", stick to X and a mature desktop environment like KDE or Gnome for now (especially if you do any gaming).
> It's just early.
Have we hit the two decade mark yet?
This stuff “just worked” in the late 90’s (and probably earlier, assuming access to unix workstation hardware) with X11, when it was roughly the age Wayland is now.
Have we hit the two decade mark yet?
This stuff “just worked” in the late 90’s (and probably earlier, assuming access to unix workstation hardware) with X11, when it was roughly the age Wayland is now.
I have two displays on my computer, one is 4k and the other is 1080p. One has HDR. One is 400 nits brightness, the other is not. Games are built across several engines with an amazing collection of rendering technologies. We have apps that embedded web browsers.
I'm sure if you restricted yourself to strictly first party native applications and a single display within one or two resolutions and no DPI scaling, Wayland probably meets most of your needs now.
I'm sure if you restricted yourself to strictly first party native applications and a single display within one or two resolutions and no DPI scaling, Wayland probably meets most of your needs now.
> This stuff “just worked” in the late 90’s
I see you have repressed the memories of editing modelines in xfree86.conf :P
I see you have repressed the memories of editing modelines in xfree86.conf :P
That’s not something the comment I was responding to mentioned.
Besides, the anti-aliasing on the type 1 fonts would have been glorious whether or not the capacitors in the back of the monitor started smoking.
Besides, the anti-aliasing on the type 1 fonts would have been glorious whether or not the capacitors in the back of the monitor started smoking.
I had a very different '90s than you did, it seems.
This is the problem with making a wholesale rewrite and not including good (and complete!) backwards compatibility for the duration of the transition.
What’s not good and incomplete about xwayland?
XWayland doesn't really help you with things that are part of the desktop environment. You can't run a desktop background/icons manager or a dock/panel in XWayland, as it won't have access to the kind of information it needs to implement all its features.
> For reference I'm using sway. swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not. You're supposed to create your own scripts around it that handles ac connect and disconnects.
Yeah, the existing tools are pretty low level. For now you need to write your own "scripts" for matching different states from different places (e.g.: idle + battery charging state). Hopefully someone will build higher level tools on top of the existing tools. The APIs are all there (i.e.: there are no technical limitations, it's just that nobody has done it yet).
> There's a tool to do flux like color warmth setting. One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it. The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
Try gammastep.
Yeah, the existing tools are pretty low level. For now you need to write your own "scripts" for matching different states from different places (e.g.: idle + battery charging state). Hopefully someone will build higher level tools on top of the existing tools. The APIs are all there (i.e.: there are no technical limitations, it's just that nobody has done it yet).
> There's a tool to do flux like color warmth setting. One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it. The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
Try gammastep.
I've been using GNOME on Wayland for over a year and have literally none of these issues other than X fractional scaling not being great. But even then fractional scaling is good enough that I generally don't notice it. (But all of my daily apps are Wayland native)
> swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not
Sounds like a problem with the tool, not Wayland.
> color warmth setting
This is a general issue on Wayland but GNOME has this built in. I'm surprised that KDE doesn't.
> In chrome and electron it's supposedly supported but you have to toggle it yourself?
I guess Chromium's Wayland support isn't considered production ready? I don't use Chromium often but running on XWayland hasn't bothered me much. I guess this would be more annoying if it was your primary browser.
> swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not
Sounds like a problem with the tool, not Wayland.
> color warmth setting
This is a general issue on Wayland but GNOME has this built in. I'm surprised that KDE doesn't.
> In chrome and electron it's supposedly supported but you have to toggle it yourself?
I guess Chromium's Wayland support isn't considered production ready? I don't use Chromium often but running on XWayland hasn't bothered me much. I guess this would be more annoying if it was your primary browser.
> And then there is electron. Slack is not the only app that ignores electron settings and doesn't run with wayland support
I wouldn’t be surprised if slack just ships with a much older chrome build that wasn’t built with wayland support.
Also, have a look at Gnome’s wayland offering. It is by far the most complete as of yet.
I wouldn’t be surprised if slack just ships with a much older chrome build that wasn’t built with wayland support.
Also, have a look at Gnome’s wayland offering. It is by far the most complete as of yet.
Slack tracks close to the latest releases of Electron. Election also tracks close to the latest Chromium releases [0].
[0] https://releases.electronjs.org
[0] https://releases.electronjs.org
scripting around hobby projects to fit your needs is the hacker ethos/mindset/what makes using linux/unix fun. But give the ecosystem time and Sway and its ecosystem will be just as good as X and i3 is.
The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
Alright first off: file a bug! How am I supposed to know there is a user with a problem, if they don't tell me!
That said not sure what you mean by this exactly... gammastep 100% does account for the local time. But it does choose the time of day to transition based on the location. Are you in a different location than your timezone is set to?
Alright first off: file a bug! How am I supposed to know there is a user with a problem, if they don't tell me!
That said not sure what you mean by this exactly... gammastep 100% does account for the local time. But it does choose the time of day to transition based on the location. Are you in a different location than your timezone is set to?
Doesn’t this have some sort of performance or battery impact if every action is firing off a script interpreter middle manager to action basic things.
Please help the community and make sure that these issues are documented in Github/whatever issue tracker.
Or if you have the skills please contribute back and fixes these things that bug you!
Or if you have the skills please contribute back and fixes these things that bug you!
Regarding randomly blurry UIs:
XFree86 (and later, x.org) have always had better support for hidpi rendering than MacOS X and Windows (by my definition, which is based on the quality of tear-free vector, font and bitmap rendering at non-standard DPIs while using mainstream hardware).
The wayland developers apparently couldn’t figure out how to read the X11 manual. Why expect them to reimplement it in a superior way?
XFree86 (and later, x.org) have always had better support for hidpi rendering than MacOS X and Windows (by my definition, which is based on the quality of tear-free vector, font and bitmap rendering at non-standard DPIs while using mainstream hardware).
The wayland developers apparently couldn’t figure out how to read the X11 manual. Why expect them to reimplement it in a superior way?
You might want to research who the first wayland developers were and are now. You might be surprised. Let's just spoiler, that they not only read the X11 manual.
I know who they were. I don’t understand how they could screw things up so badly, given their backgrounds in X11 development.
I can only assume some other part of the team designed fractional scaling.
I can only assume some other part of the team designed fractional scaling.
The thing that made me switch to Wayland was having two monitors with different DPI, which was unsupported by X.
IIRC, a big chunk of that was the trend that led to wayland causing "effective deprecation" of some more complex aspects of X11, like replacing multihead with windows into unified frame buffer (which now required single DPI for all screens while multihead allowed completely different settings)
Xorg does support having multiple monitors with different DPI, however applications need to use the RandR extension to obtain that per-monitor information as an older API that provided per-screen information (which doesn't make sense for Xinerama anyway) is hardcoded for backwards compatibility reasons (an attempt was made a couple of Xorg releases ago to remove the hardcoded value and present a more appropriate value but it broke a bunch of programs so it was reversed).
Intent is one thing, whenever userland GUI developers actually uses the API the intended way is another. It's not a bug, it's just a undocumented feature.
If everyone uses the API the "wrong way", now you're stuck supporting the "wrong way" or everything breaks and people WILL complain.
If everyone uses the API the "wrong way", now you're stuck supporting the "wrong way" or everything breaks and people WILL complain.
So your issues are basically exclusively with X, X clients and most of all, proprietary X clients that are using major-revs-old versions of Electron. Yeah, that sounds like a real drag, glad I use Wayland and only have Ledger Live that I'm forced to use twice a year.
> But the fact that years in they still haven't found a proper solution on passing down hidpi for xwayland? That's incomprehensible for me.
It's crazy how this is incomprehensible despite it being explained quite clearly every time it comes up. There might be patches, but they are incomplete and they are kludgy and the experts that could push it through ARE WORKING ON IMPROVING WAYLAND. If it remains incomprehensible, go read through the fractional scaling protocol merge and see how much discussion there was for designing that protocol, not even considering the X interop scenario you want.
You can: (1) try really hard to convince volunteers to spend huge amounts of time supporting something they deemed dead years ago, or (2) try to get shitty proprietary companies to, you know, fund a single developer part time to do basic maintenance, (3) use less crappy tools and/or demand that you aren't forced to use shitty tools.
Why is it ALWAYS that people reach for (1)? I swear to god I hope it's folks that don't do OSS development themselves. The entitlement and ignorance makes me head spin. But hey, random OSS devs are much easier to rage at than your CTO, or some random "chat startup" that doesn't give a fuck. So rock on with your ire against OSS devs not working on your explicitly deprecated scenario.
> But the fact that years in they still haven't found a proper solution on passing down hidpi for xwayland? That's incomprehensible for me.
It's crazy how this is incomprehensible despite it being explained quite clearly every time it comes up. There might be patches, but they are incomplete and they are kludgy and the experts that could push it through ARE WORKING ON IMPROVING WAYLAND. If it remains incomprehensible, go read through the fractional scaling protocol merge and see how much discussion there was for designing that protocol, not even considering the X interop scenario you want.
You can: (1) try really hard to convince volunteers to spend huge amounts of time supporting something they deemed dead years ago, or (2) try to get shitty proprietary companies to, you know, fund a single developer part time to do basic maintenance, (3) use less crappy tools and/or demand that you aren't forced to use shitty tools.
Why is it ALWAYS that people reach for (1)? I swear to god I hope it's folks that don't do OSS development themselves. The entitlement and ignorance makes me head spin. But hey, random OSS devs are much easier to rage at than your CTO, or some random "chat startup" that doesn't give a fuck. So rock on with your ire against OSS devs not working on your explicitly deprecated scenario.
Weirdly, I was just thinking about this earlier today. Years ago, Wine developers basically refused to add Wayland support. They told the Wayland devs that they'd stick with X11 and XWayland. Why? Because X11 and Win32 specify position windows in absolute screen coordinates, whereas Wayland positions windows relative to their parents. This broke some assumptions across the Wine project about positioning windows, and it didn't seem worth it to fix[0][1]. (And there may have been other issues. I'm not an expert).
Even when the driver was being developed around 2021, it seems like the Wine developers only begrudgingly accepted it[2].
Exciting to see this finally hitting upstream. Progress in desktop Linux often seems slow, but things are moving forward.
[0] https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42284#c1
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19127952
[2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Wine-Julliard-Wayland-2021
Even when the driver was being developed around 2021, it seems like the Wine developers only begrudgingly accepted it[2].
Exciting to see this finally hitting upstream. Progress in desktop Linux often seems slow, but things are moving forward.
[0] https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42284#c1
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19127952
[2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Wine-Julliard-Wayland-2021
Many of those restriction in wayland were by design. Lots of simple task is seen as privileged and restricted to the window manager.
These restriction may (or may not) make sense for native wayland application.
However, for wine, as a compatible layer with windows, every deviation from windows behavior is seen as a missing feature.
I am not sure if constantly creating artificial restriction and working around them is "moving forward".
However, for wine, as a compatible layer with windows, every deviation from windows behavior is seen as a missing feature.
I am not sure if constantly creating artificial restriction and working around them is "moving forward".
If the restriction is about improving real security issues and people are doing that work for free, then isn’t it worth it? In fact, if I were an open-source project myself and someone is willing to go through the legwork of supporting doing the migration of my codebase to a newer piece of tech, I should be encouraging it and the only thing I get to enforce is quality for it being a default and no substantial regressions when not using that new tech (or I can accept some regressions if I think the value provided is better). So if XWayland is better then fine. But someone has to keep putting maintenance resources into it. The Wayland folks shouldn’t be putting any resources into it when they think they’ve reasonably addressed any real technical blockers and then they should ask for the distro maintainers to remove it because they don’t want to maintain it anymore. The distro owners can donate maintenance cycles or $$ if XWayland is a sufficient experience in terms of providing the perf, DX and security that projects they care about need. Cooler projects with more attention will naturally obtain more dev cycles from talented engineers anyway.
The work is not done for free. It is done by consultant agencies like Collabora with full time paid developers. It is just unclear who funds them.
And no, it's not worth it. The amount of regressions are high compared to the rather questionable security benefits.
And no, it's not worth it. The amount of regressions are high compared to the rather questionable security benefits.
“For free” meaning from the perspective of Wine. The project isn’t using its own funds to pay for this.
I don't think the Wine developers were simply being hostile due to a dislike of the concept, I also agree that a Wine Wayland driver seems weird. And yet, here we are: when I use it, it seems to work almost exactly like you'd hope. I'm not sure if the reason this has changed is because there are new standard Wayland protocols that help with some of these issues, or if they just came up with clever workarounds (like always anchoring new windows to be relatively positioned or something.) Either way, it works.
I have heard there are still some tricky impedance mismatches though. I have no idea what they're doing for the system tray, for example. Right now, if I cause a tray icon to exist in Wine with Wayland patches on SwayWM, what happens is I get a "Wine System Tray" window. Not ideal to be sure.
I have heard there are still some tricky impedance mismatches though. I have no idea what they're doing for the system tray, for example. Right now, if I cause a tray icon to exist in Wine with Wayland patches on SwayWM, what happens is I get a "Wine System Tray" window. Not ideal to be sure.
This falls right on time for my 2023 "Linux on the desktop" attempt! (now I wish https://github.com/phil294/AHK_X11 had a Wayland option...)
I can't live without Office! My personal favorite is 2010 x64, as Word then starts faster than the current Wordpad.
Office 2010 works great in Windows 11, but there've been some suspicious move making me believe old office version will be given a poison pill or something under the plausible deniability of "security risks of 13 year old software", like how Outlook 2010 can't connect to outlook.com anymore (though it works great with gmail using google's GWSO plugin)
On MY computer, I run what I want. So I'll try Office 2010 in wine within Wayland.
I can't live without Office! My personal favorite is 2010 x64, as Word then starts faster than the current Wordpad.
Office 2010 works great in Windows 11, but there've been some suspicious move making me believe old office version will be given a poison pill or something under the plausible deniability of "security risks of 13 year old software", like how Outlook 2010 can't connect to outlook.com anymore (though it works great with gmail using google's GWSO plugin)
On MY computer, I run what I want. So I'll try Office 2010 in wine within Wayland.
> On MY computer, I run what I want.
You can always do so, as long as you're not connected to the internet. In the same way that on your property you can drive what you want, but on the road there are minimum standards of safety that are supposed to be met, and some authority might enforce them. I completely relate to the "who moved my cheese?" effect, but unpatched internet connected software affects more than just yourself. This is not giving companies that completely disable software that could otherwise be hardened with some minimal loss of functionality (like disabling the old Office equation editor) a pass.
You can always do so, as long as you're not connected to the internet. In the same way that on your property you can drive what you want, but on the road there are minimum standards of safety that are supposed to be met, and some authority might enforce them. I completely relate to the "who moved my cheese?" effect, but unpatched internet connected software affects more than just yourself. This is not giving companies that completely disable software that could otherwise be hardened with some minimal loss of functionality (like disabling the old Office equation editor) a pass.
Being connected to the internet is nothing like being a car on a road... it's more like joining a "crowd" of "people", with each "person" being another internet-connected computer, and the "crowd" being the network. The recent "pandemic" has taught everyone a lot about virus-spread stuff, so it's an appropriate analogy in my opinion.
Vulnerable pieces of software can be exploited to receive or transmit viruses. The viruses spread through the crowd to anyone who is vulnerable. But just because someone spread the virus doesn't mean an authority is going to crack down on them for being intentionally reckless. If you crash into somebody on the road however...
Vulnerable pieces of software can be exploited to receive or transmit viruses. The viruses spread through the crowd to anyone who is vulnerable. But just because someone spread the virus doesn't mean an authority is going to crack down on them for being intentionally reckless. If you crash into somebody on the road however...
I've been running these patches to play around with them and it seems pretty good; layered windows (WS_EX_LAYERED) work great, and the issue you would have with non-reparenting X11/XWayland WMs (mostly the mouse cursor being offset) is gone. There's still some minor quirks remaining, so it's not perfect, but a complex program like FL Studio seems to work just fine, as does some games using Wined3d.
The only thing I really hit that would be nice to fix is that it appears tablet support isn't in yet, or at least it didn't work for me. Of course, tablet support is a thing I generally wish could be improved in Wine, especially because Windows apps are slowly moving towards more modern APIs than the old wintab32 defacto standard.
The only thing I really hit that would be nice to fix is that it appears tablet support isn't in yet, or at least it didn't work for me. Of course, tablet support is a thing I generally wish could be improved in Wine, especially because Windows apps are slowly moving towards more modern APIs than the old wintab32 defacto standard.
Neat, good seeing progress on this front.
Many Windows applications since Windows 7 support fractional scaling natively (125%, 150%). Is there any way of accessing these modes with WINE? Is this really the same thing as simply setting the font DPI scale (which is what the WINE docs suggest doing)?
Many Windows applications since Windows 7 support fractional scaling natively (125%, 150%). Is there any way of accessing these modes with WINE? Is this really the same thing as simply setting the font DPI scale (which is what the WINE docs suggest doing)?
I am not knowledgeable on the low level details of Wine, or windows gui apis, but this might actually become properly working on the Wayland backend, as it has a scaling property.
can someone explain what is going on here? i know what wine is, it's a thing that lets you play windows games on linux or macos, but what is wayland?
Linux gui applications historically have used X11 for desktop window management (think how your windows layer on top of each other).
Wayland is a new ecosystem that aims to take over for X11 (as X11 was developed in mind with a lot of functionality that many do not care about, and just want a desktop environment).
But it's a controversial effort, and Wayland still doesn't support a lot of the functionality even from the desktop perspective.
Wine is not something that lets you (just) play games, it is effectively a re-implementation of windows low level apis, on top of linux. It lets you call the dlls, and kernel functions, effectively running windows applications in linux.
The wine community is opinionated, and effectively weren't going to support Wayland; because it has some shortcomings in terms of api surface or ways that wayland handles things.
Someone decided to try to support wayland anyway.
Wayland is a new ecosystem that aims to take over for X11 (as X11 was developed in mind with a lot of functionality that many do not care about, and just want a desktop environment).
But it's a controversial effort, and Wayland still doesn't support a lot of the functionality even from the desktop perspective.
Wine is not something that lets you (just) play games, it is effectively a re-implementation of windows low level apis, on top of linux. It lets you call the dlls, and kernel functions, effectively running windows applications in linux.
The wine community is opinionated, and effectively weren't going to support Wayland; because it has some shortcomings in terms of api surface or ways that wayland handles things.
Someone decided to try to support wayland anyway.
> X11 for desktop window management (think how your windows layer on top of each other)
That’s not really the primary job of these protocols - they are primarily about interfacing with GUI apps and displaying their content — compositing those contents on top of each other in one way or another is the job of a window manager, which can be in-built, or separate from the display server.
> Wayland still doesn't support a lot of the functionality even from the desktop perspective
This has been less and less true. Plenty, or even most distros ship with wayland by default and people don’t even realize it. Under gnome which is arguably the most complete implementation I really have a hard time listing things that don’t work.
That’s not really the primary job of these protocols - they are primarily about interfacing with GUI apps and displaying their content — compositing those contents on top of each other in one way or another is the job of a window manager, which can be in-built, or separate from the display server.
> Wayland still doesn't support a lot of the functionality even from the desktop perspective
This has been less and less true. Plenty, or even most distros ship with wayland by default and people don’t even realize it. Under gnome which is arguably the most complete implementation I really have a hard time listing things that don’t work.
It’s less a shortcoming of the wayland api, and more that they didn’t want to implement bad ideas in the protocol with the only use case being windows api compatibility.
Honestly, most people shouldn't even much have to know what Wayland is, and the fact that we're even talking about it is a testament to how badly it was done.
It's the thing that makes graphics on the screen, i.e. why you're not looking at a terminal. For some reason, the decision was made to drastically revamp it in such a way that trying to switch caused a lot of problems. This is like a TEN YEAR OLD deal.
It's the thing that makes graphics on the screen, i.e. why you're not looking at a terminal. For some reason, the decision was made to drastically revamp it in such a way that trying to switch caused a lot of problems. This is like a TEN YEAR OLD deal.
These days it’s pretty much done and finished. Xwayland works fairly well to the point you almost couldn’t tell.
The only issue with wayland usage currently is apps in the xwayland compatibility layer are lacking the new features wayland adds like dpi scaling across screens.
I’m very happy that wayland + pipewire + flatpak now gives us basic security practices like apps having to ask permission to record the mic/screen/webcam vs the state of things in X where being able to draw a window also grants full access to everything.
The only issue with wayland usage currently is apps in the xwayland compatibility layer are lacking the new features wayland adds like dpi scaling across screens.
I’m very happy that wayland + pipewire + flatpak now gives us basic security practices like apps having to ask permission to record the mic/screen/webcam vs the state of things in X where being able to draw a window also grants full access to everything.
Mostly fail to see the value in the specific thing you're saying; essentially this is the sort of thing that e.g. free/open source ought to take care of regardless.
As in, this is "taken care of" when you agree to install the application; is there any serious reason to believe that security against an "installed application" from a repo benefits from this rather fine grained permission as opposed to what is already in place?
And of course the real issue is usually just "the web browser" which, hey, all bets are off.
As in, this is "taken care of" when you agree to install the application; is there any serious reason to believe that security against an "installed application" from a repo benefits from this rather fine grained permission as opposed to what is already in place?
And of course the real issue is usually just "the web browser" which, hey, all bets are off.
We are still fixing stuff in Wayland, stuff that Microsoft and Apple had figured out 20 years ago.
So defeating.
So defeating.
> We are still fixing stuff in Wayland, stuff that Microsoft and Apple had figured out 20 years ago.
I don't know, given that the UX situation in Windows UI - itself a inconsistent disaster that makes the disjointed things that make up KDE looks like a consistent desktop experience. They can't decide what UI framework to keep supporting, they keep changing what you're supposed to use to build your GUI every bunch of years.
As for the Apple side, well, destroying everything every few years with almost no regards for backwards compatibility isn't "figured out 20 years ago".
I don't know, given that the UX situation in Windows UI - itself a inconsistent disaster that makes the disjointed things that make up KDE looks like a consistent desktop experience. They can't decide what UI framework to keep supporting, they keep changing what you're supposed to use to build your GUI every bunch of years.
As for the Apple side, well, destroying everything every few years with almost no regards for backwards compatibility isn't "figured out 20 years ago".
[deleted]
Apple has giving up on having consistently non-blurry fractional scaling, pushing apple users to buy monitors "recommended by Apple", even if they are from other vendors.
On Windows not all Apps do scale on a HiDPI display. You then have to fiddle in the program's launch options and hope it's not too blurry when scaled.
Wayland does only have blurriness with certain Xwayland embeddings.
It's not a solved problem.
On Windows not all Apps do scale on a HiDPI display. You then have to fiddle in the program's launch options and hope it's not too blurry when scaled.
Wayland does only have blurriness with certain Xwayland embeddings.
It's not a solved problem.
And Microsoft figuring out how to make Windows even worse with every new day!
Indeed, but Microsoft knows how to make a OS graphics base and stick with it.
MS does a lot of things wrong, but backwards compatibility is still their strong point.
MS does a lot of things wrong, but backwards compatibility is still their strong point.
Yet Microsoft makes so many of them. I'm not even sure what the current recommended way is anymore.
Having many graphics frameworks simultaneously supported is basically the ultimate evidence of the claim; they made half a dozen frameworks and stuck with all of them!
Like what? At least be specific.
Like screen recording. Popular Wayland native apps not dependant on Xorg. Wine working on Wayland.
Tangible benefits of switching to Wayland. And by those, I don't mean "no screen tearing", since it practically did not exist on most desktop environments with half-decent compositors.
Tangible benefits of switching to Wayland. And by those, I don't mean "no screen tearing", since it practically did not exist on most desktop environments with half-decent compositors.
Screen recording works, even with OBS studio. What popular wayland native app is dependent on xorg?
> half-decent compositors.
At which point there was no point of X11 middle-maning between the compositor and apps -> tada Wayland it is.
Also, screen tearing is a bigger issue on bigger resolution higher refresh rate monitors, hardware just grew up to 1080@60fps.
> half-decent compositors.
At which point there was no point of X11 middle-maning between the compositor and apps -> tada Wayland it is.
Also, screen tearing is a bigger issue on bigger resolution higher refresh rate monitors, hardware just grew up to 1080@60fps.
There's a ton of apps that are not Wayland native at all yet, and plenty that never will be because of the dubious security benefits.
Chrome, for an example. Firefox isn't much better.
Chrome, for an example. Firefox isn't much better.
Chrome is as wayland native as xorg native it is. It has backends for both. The same is true for Firefox.
And no one ever said that every program will have to move to Wayland, XWayland was created specifically for legacy applications to be usable that won’t port over. (Though their number is limited, since most applications use a framework like gtk/qt/electron whatever and all of those natively support wayland without changing the programs).
And no one ever said that every program will have to move to Wayland, XWayland was created specifically for legacy applications to be usable that won’t port over. (Though their number is limited, since most applications use a framework like gtk/qt/electron whatever and all of those natively support wayland without changing the programs).
I run Wayland using PopOS. I can record screens and run WINE apps. I have a cheap laptop and it works just fine.
Wayland means - for me - no fiddling with text files if I want an external monitor, roatated, with a weird resolution.
Wayland means - for me - no fiddling with text files if I want an external monitor, roatated, with a weird resolution.
I run X11 as my daily driver in a 3 monitor setup and I regularly see tearing scrolling on a page in Kwin which I think qualifies as a half decent compositor, right?
You can use kwin with compositing disabled or by setting some obscure tripple buffering flag in its configuration.
As far as I understand it had sync issues even on single monitor setups until relatively recently because it did not try to sync at all and instead just refreshed everything based on an internal timer.
As far as I understand it had sync issues even on single monitor setups until relatively recently because it did not try to sync at all and instead just refreshed everything based on an internal timer.
Recently as in Debian? Or recently as in not in Arch yet?
For what it’s worth didn’t matter compositing is on or not.
For what it’s worth didn’t matter compositing is on or not.
I found it mentioned in a ticket from 2020, so basically Debian recent.
To be honest the situations where I needed tearing free output on multiple displays I usually ended up configuring separate X screens.
To be honest the situations where I needed tearing free output on multiple displays I usually ended up configuring separate X screens.
Good to see it's approaching merging!
I ran a few tests and it works for games well already, but there are still some issues to iron out. I'll run more tests once it's upstreamed.
I ran a few tests and it works for games well already, but there are still some issues to iron out. I'll run more tests once it's upstreamed.
[deleted]
Since this isn't a community effort at all but purely done by a consultant agency called Collabora my question would be, who is funding them?
Always the question when it comes to Collabora work... they don't often tell.
A lot of these issues have fixes or workarounds directly in KDE.
For reference I'm using sway. swayidle is an idle daemon, where the maintainer doesn't think that it matters whether its connected to power or not. You're supposed to create your own scripts around it that handles ac connect and disconnects.
There's a tool to do flux like color warmth setting. One of them doesn't allow you to toggle, so you have create your own toggle script that kills or restarts it. The other one is controllable, but doesn't actually account for time or timezone.
XWayland has had 2 or 3 patches to handle hidpi when the main wayland screen has fractional scaling, none of them are merged and they seem hardly active. KDE works around that by allowing you to turn it off for xwayland clients. Sway just passes it down and blurs everything.
When I exit a wayland session and then restart it the screen locks up. This doesn't happen with normal X.
And then there is electron. Slack is not the only app that ignores electron settings and doesn't run with wayland support. In chrome and electron it's supposedly supported but you have to toggle it yourself? What is this madness?
These things seem like basic functionality for me. I don't really get it. Sure, maybe I shouldn't expect a proper experience for random sway tools, so that makes the first two points irrelevant. But the fact that years in they still haven't found a proper solution on passing down hidpi for xwayland? That's incomprehensible for me.