Meta AI App built with Llama 4(about.fb.com)
about.fb.com
Meta AI App built with Llama 4
https://about.fb.com/news/2025/04/introducing-meta-ai-app-new-way-access-ai-assistant/
110 comments
iOS apps cannot access your Safari browsing history. I'm not even sure what "purchase history" actually means? They can't access photos and videos without explicitly granting permission.
This surely would just refer to the massive trove of data Facebook has already gathered about you.
This surely would just refer to the massive trove of data Facebook has already gathered about you.
Most likely it does what their other apps do: opens URLs in an in-app "browser" WebView, which is then injected with a ton of trackers that have unlimited access to everything you browse in their app.
iOS apps are allowed to add arbitrary JavaScript to any page on any domain, even HTTPS, as long as it's a WebView and not the standalone Safari app.
iOS apps are allowed to add arbitrary JavaScript to any page on any domain, even HTTPS, as long as it's a WebView and not the standalone Safari app.
This is generally worse UX vs. just opening Safari. There have been exactly zero times where I was happy that a link opened in an app's WebView, instead of in Safari or the appropriate external app.
Why does a seemingly privacy-focused Apple create the compromisable WebView system for apps? Is there some weird edge case for apps that they need this, for a non-evil reason?
Why does a seemingly privacy-focused Apple create the compromisable WebView system for apps? Is there some weird edge case for apps that they need this, for a non-evil reason?
There is SCSafariController, and even Android has CustomTabs API for private in-app browsers. It's just very inconvenient for Meta/Facebook.
WebView is very useful for UIs. You're probably using it more than you know in the "native" apps.
WebView is very useful for UIs. You're probably using it more than you know in the "native" apps.
I’ve never worked on iOS apps before, but after writing my comment I looked into it. Yes, I absolutely use WebView all the time without knowing it.
Still, would be cool if I had a setting for each app that allows forcing opening 3rd party URLs in Safari, and not WebView, if that is feasible.
Still, would be cool if I had a setting for each app that allows forcing opening 3rd party URLs in Safari, and not WebView, if that is feasible.
They don’t allow third party browser engines. If they didn’t allow web view they are effectively banning third party browsers completely. I can’t imagine that would make their anti trust problems any better.
That makes sense. Thanks.
Although, it does seem like they could get more granular in app approval, which I am sure iOS devs would not like, but users would. For example, "If your app's primary use case is navigation of the open web, you may use WebView to handle 3rd party links. However, if that is not the primary purpose of your app, web links must open in iOS."
Either that, or give me a setting for each app, which the dev can set the default on. "Open links in Safari."
Although, it does seem like they could get more granular in app approval, which I am sure iOS devs would not like, but users would. For example, "If your app's primary use case is navigation of the open web, you may use WebView to handle 3rd party links. However, if that is not the primary purpose of your app, web links must open in iOS."
Either that, or give me a setting for each app, which the dev can set the default on. "Open links in Safari."
There’s a permission for Location at least, “In App Web Browsing” can have that permission disabled. Web Views don’t seem to have similar treatment otherwise, afaict. I’d sandbox them aggressively if I could .
I use Adguard which has a Safari integration that appears to apply to Web Views (based on the absence of ads), though I don’t have proof of that.
I use Adguard which has a Safari integration that appears to apply to Web Views (based on the absence of ads), though I don’t have proof of that.
> I use Adguard which has a Safari integration that appears to apply to Web Views (based on the absence of ads), though I don’t have proof of that.
I have been wondering about this for a couple years now. Do Safari content filters apply to app WebViews? I assumed not.
Can any iOS dev chime in? I don't have have a modern Mac and dev account to test this at this time.
I have been wondering about this for a couple years now. Do Safari content filters apply to app WebViews? I assumed not.
Can any iOS dev chime in? I don't have have a modern Mac and dev account to test this at this time.
Well, just off the top of my head, an epub is basically HTML and is simple to implement with a web view. Nice when the OS has a framework that provides one.
Beware? Why? The app is marketed as providing personalized experience. How is it supposed to do that if it doesn't know anything about you?
Because Meta have repeatedly shown themselves to not be good stewards of this type of data in the past.
If you already have Facebook/Messenger in your phone, and haven't bothered to change default permissions, I guess Meta AI will only add your voice, image, and textual interactions to your already thick dossier. Not much more harm done.
Might as well but the Ray-Ban Meta AI Glasses and embrace the exposure already.
Might as well but the Ray-Ban Meta AI Glasses and embrace the exposure already.
Web: https://meta.ai/
iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/meta-ai/id1558240027
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.facebook.s...
iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/meta-ai/id1558240027
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.facebook.s...
Such weird Apps. Typical Meta.
The iOS app screenshots are all about Wayfarer AR glasses. Nothing about Meta.AI.
The iOS app screenshots are all about Wayfarer AR glasses. Nothing about Meta.AI.
The app id (com.facebook.stella) was for an app called Meta View. It looks like they just rebranded an app that was previously used for Smart glasses and is now using it as their official AI app.
Why rebrand rather than create a new app? Who knows. Maybe to demonstrate a high(ish) download count at launch, maybe for app/play store credibility.
Why rebrand rather than create a new app? Who knows. Maybe to demonstrate a high(ish) download count at launch, maybe for app/play store credibility.
They rebranded the app designed exclusively for that (Meta View) and added the chat features.
Yea but why? Honest question. It has a totally different purpose
Users that have the old app will get the new updated one installed.
Also probably for App Store SEO/rankings.
Meta is known for scummy behaviour, as we all know…
Also probably for App Store SEO/rankings.
Meta is known for scummy behaviour, as we all know…
Congrats Beau!
Who is this app adding value for? How is it differentiated?
The models are not sota, the feature set is no stronger than comparable apps, the privacy situation is as expected.
Not seeing it.
The models are not sota, the feature set is no stronger than comparable apps, the privacy situation is as expected.
Not seeing it.
They will show you personalized ads after knowing everything about your life, how cool is that?
I'd pay to get a copy of my dossier from them. Why haven't they monetized that?
"Here, this is what we spied from you last year. Consider most data brokers have already shamelessly traded with this info. Be more careful this year.
Regards, Mark."
"Here, this is what we spied from you last year. Consider most data brokers have already shamelessly traded with this info. Be more careful this year.
Regards, Mark."
This is about strengthening their own ecosystem (glasses, whatsapp), not attracting power users from competitors
You don't want an automated em-dash inserter?
Tons of people use Metas existing products. Like an astonishing amount of people, despite the attitude of the typical HN crowd.
Many of those people aren’t particularly tech savvy, and aren’t hip to the latest technology. By embedding “Meta AI” into each app, they’re reaching an audience far greater than can be reached by most non-Google AI products.
Once they get hooked on using Meta AI (because it was there, and they didn’t know to search for others), they’re reaching may want a dedicated app.
Many of those people aren’t particularly tech savvy, and aren’t hip to the latest technology. By embedding “Meta AI” into each app, they’re reaching an audience far greater than can be reached by most non-Google AI products.
Once they get hooked on using Meta AI (because it was there, and they didn’t know to search for others), they’re reaching may want a dedicated app.
I talk and work with plenty of non-tech-savvy people. They don't give a flying fuck about Meta AI.
The HN crowd is indeed overly dismissive of Meta and their reach across numerous markets, and my experience is not the end-all-be-all of data collection of course. But I have yet to see any casual users of anything who give a ghost of a shit about AI. Like I'm not even saying they're anti-AI or skeptics or whatever, I'm saying: any time in the last like 2 years when some product or another has had some damn AI or another integrated into it: reactions range from indifference to irritation.
Most I've seen is people see it, wonder what it is, ask it a few things, and then get bored with it and go back to what they were doing.
The HN crowd is indeed overly dismissive of Meta and their reach across numerous markets, and my experience is not the end-all-be-all of data collection of course. But I have yet to see any casual users of anything who give a ghost of a shit about AI. Like I'm not even saying they're anti-AI or skeptics or whatever, I'm saying: any time in the last like 2 years when some product or another has had some damn AI or another integrated into it: reactions range from indifference to irritation.
Most I've seen is people see it, wonder what it is, ask it a few things, and then get bored with it and go back to what they were doing.
I don't understand why. Why would I want a Facebook AI assistant? I dont understand why its in messenger and WhatsApp either?
Why the fuck they had to infest the only reasonable product (they bought) - whatsapp. Outside of US its more used than sms or any other chat, including apple ones even on apple platform. No other meta app has any reason to exist on the phone of any reasonable user (I know most aren't, but this is HN and not army of social network addicts wasting their life online).
I guess it was to be expected, but I hate meta products with passion and removed them from phone many years ago (when they were leeching battery hard even when not used), cancerous leech of humanity for the goal of getting fer people ridiculously rich and richer.
I guess it was to be expected, but I hate meta products with passion and removed them from phone many years ago (when they were leeching battery hard even when not used), cancerous leech of humanity for the goal of getting fer people ridiculously rich and richer.
Facebook doesn't, Meta does. Social media is dead, per Zuckerberg, didn't you hear?
It's astonishing how much community goodwill and excitement there was for llama when it first came out, and how much it has plummeted since then.
Partly the sheen has worn off, and of course there are other interesting "open source" llm offerings now, but I don't think it can be overstated how much Meta is just a toxic brand.
Threads had a very similar arc.
Partly the sheen has worn off, and of course there are other interesting "open source" llm offerings now, but I don't think it can be overstated how much Meta is just a toxic brand.
Threads had a very similar arc.
fwiw this really doesn't mesh with my experience. The goodwill and excitement is still there for Llama, though diluted by the abundance of model options out there. That said, my lense does tilt heavily towards self hosting where the community is probably overall much more appreciative and excited about Meta's AI
Llama 4 license probably needs more than one set of scary quotes around """open source""".
The Chinese are the real driver of open source/open weights models now. China's brand is overtaking Meta's, and US (corporations) in general.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43676254
The Chinese are the real driver of open source/open weights models now. China's brand is overtaking Meta's, and US (corporations) in general.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43676254
WRT Llama, IMO it’s only because they couldn’t infect a model with ad tracking that it overcame the tarnish. As long as I don’t need to run their conventional software to use it, I consider it safe.
I’m on the fence about their API product( technically they could tie it to one’s identity (as OpenAI could) but I’d imagine that would be less valuable given they can’t know which human is really behind it.
I’m on the fence about their API product( technically they could tie it to one’s identity (as OpenAI could) but I’d imagine that would be less valuable given they can’t know which human is really behind it.
Threads had "Oh my god, so many people are using it"
Beyond the fact it's possible that they were counting Instagram users in those metrics, yeah, people are going to sign up to try the new thing
But it's what you came to expect from Zuckerberg, absolutely no way to control the feed at all, poor excuse for federation
Beyond the fact it's possible that they were counting Instagram users in those metrics, yeah, people are going to sign up to try the new thing
But it's what you came to expect from Zuckerberg, absolutely no way to control the feed at all, poor excuse for federation
This might be interesting if it pulled data from Meta properties (e.g. the Instagram accounts I am following) in order to personally contextualize its responses.
I'm surprised the chatbot on Instagram doesn't already have that. Giving an LLM access to a highly personalized search tool (the scroll algorithm) would make asking for recommendations so much better.
Meta can turn this App into a sort of my assistant. I can dump any link into it. And since those links form the basis of my worldview helping the assistant understand me better. Currently only Google has a monopoly on such a possible futuristic assistant.
Meta has terrible "separation of concerns" within their apps. I just downloaded Messenger the other day and realized that they now also show you your feed within messenger. Why?? If i wanted to see my feed I would have downloaded the Facebook app. Same with WhatsApp and Instagram trying to cram down AI.
My theory is you have these app "fiefdoms" that are run by different product managers and all of them are trying to steal users from the other product to show that their product is driving growth. So you end up with 10 apps that implement 90% of the same features.
My theory is you have these app "fiefdoms" that are run by different product managers and all of them are trying to steal users from the other product to show that their product is driving growth. So you end up with 10 apps that implement 90% of the same features.
Probably there are many people like me - I use messenger and not the Facebook. But they REALLY want ppl like me to use the Facebook.
Zuckerberg suggested wiping everyone's Facebook friends - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43694861 - April 2025 (no comments)
Mark Zuckerberg suggested wiping everyone’s Facebook friends and making users start again to boost the platform’s relevance - https://fortune.com/2025/04/15/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-inst... | https://archive.today/01pLO
Mark Zuckerberg suggested wiping everyone’s Facebook friends and making users start again to boost the platform’s relevance - https://fortune.com/2025/04/15/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-inst... | https://archive.today/01pLO
He'd suggest doing that more than just the blindingly obvious thing of just allowing us to turn off the algorithm and only get content from friends?
What a tool.
What a tool.
That's already a thing: https://about.fb.com/news/2025/03/bringing-magic-of-friends-...
Which sounds great except I can't find it or make it work.
Friends tab on mobile? Last I looked it didn't work on web for me
wow! let’s see if people return as a result!
The lowkey makes sense. It’s more or less what they did with “close friends” on instagram, no?
Pretty sure Zuck makes these decisions and doesn’t give individual apps within Meta much freedom. I recall Instagram (after being acquired) wanting to develop their app a certain way and Zuck kept giving them a hard “no” on a lot of features he thought would steal users from Facebook. Same deal with WhatsApp. I think the Founders of WhatsApp left Meta due to this dynamic (among other things).
This is rational strategy for WhatsApp founders: why would they stay after being paid out? There is no way they can earn more on top of what was already paid.
The WhatsApp founders received the majority of their compensation from the deal in the form of equity in Facebook. As the leaders of an important product unit, I think they could have reasonably expected that staying and continuing to improve the product would have resulted in their Facebook equity increasing in value, some of which they were probably barred from immediately liquidating.
It got a bit more interesting than that.
> Now he’s talking publicly for the first time. Under pressure from Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg to monetize WhatsApp, he pushed back as Facebook questioned the encryption he'd helped build and laid the groundwork to show targeted ads and facilitate commercial messaging. Acton also walked away from Facebook a year before his final tranche of stock grants vested. “It was like, okay, well, you want to do these things I don’t want to do,” Acton says. “It’s better if I get out of your way. And I did.” It was perhaps the most expensive moral stand in history. Acton took a screenshot of the stock price on his way out the door—the decision cost him $850 million.
> It’s also a story any idealistic entrepreneur can identify with: What happens when you build something incredible and then sell it to someone with far different plans for your baby? “At the end of the day, I sold my company,” Acton says. “I sold my users’ privacy to a larger benefit. I made a choice and a compromise. And I live with that every day.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2018/09/26/exclusive...
> Now he’s talking publicly for the first time. Under pressure from Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg to monetize WhatsApp, he pushed back as Facebook questioned the encryption he'd helped build and laid the groundwork to show targeted ads and facilitate commercial messaging. Acton also walked away from Facebook a year before his final tranche of stock grants vested. “It was like, okay, well, you want to do these things I don’t want to do,” Acton says. “It’s better if I get out of your way. And I did.” It was perhaps the most expensive moral stand in history. Acton took a screenshot of the stock price on his way out the door—the decision cost him $850 million.
> It’s also a story any idealistic entrepreneur can identify with: What happens when you build something incredible and then sell it to someone with far different plans for your baby? “At the end of the day, I sold my company,” Acton says. “I sold my users’ privacy to a larger benefit. I made a choice and a compromise. And I live with that every day.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2018/09/26/exclusive...
Not sure on the specifics of the WhatsApp deal, but often times the founders, or key employees will be paid in stock from the new company that vests over some number of years (4 usually). Some or a lot of it might be up front, but to get 100% of it, they might have had to stay for a few years.
Surely having billions in the bank was part of why WhatsApp left.
it's all about getting you into the endless feed of content. that's where their money lives, and that's where they want you to be.
This is pure speculation, but perhaps it is a way to prevent being forced to do a corporate breakup? I guess it's harder to split up if it seems less like separate products. Zuckerberg tried sucking up to Trump, but the FTC case against Meta is still in full force.
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/4/15/mark-zuckerberg-...
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/4/15/mark-zuckerberg-...
Interesting that they tie the glasses so into this new app, while all AI functionality of the glasses still being disabled in the EU.
yes I feel cheated for buying those glasses that are essentially earbuds in eu
Should generally not buy anything meta.
Their AI doesn't work in my country and honestly I don't feel left out. Whatever
Their AI doesn't work in my country and honestly I don't feel left out. Whatever
Even in the US you run the risk of having your hardware soft bricked by having your linked Meta account banned for some vague infraction which is probably just cover for not exposing yourself sufficiently to Meta.
They added some AI slip chat to their WhatsApp client that seems to have context info about my chats and I can't opt out of that. It's also got a permanent icon hovering at the bottom right which I tend to hit while scrolling through contacts.
They've become the parody of how to do AI tools badly. It's disgusting.
They've become the parody of how to do AI tools badly. It's disgusting.
You can absolutely get the voice in the iOS app to John Cena and then tell it to pretend to be Peacemaker from the TV show and have a chat about how great Eagly is.
Meta projects are increasingly lame, and Yann Lecun hasn't had a single useful idea for years now
Why do the AI web apps not have voice mode?
Does this mean they'll remove the meta ai stuff from whatsapp?
They added it onto mine about a month ago. It disappeared for a couple of weeks and showed up again a few days ago. The search bar now says: “Ask Meta AI or Search,” which I’m sure means every search you make gets sent to their servers.
In your phantasy maybe.
Heh, no. Everything is AI now. We've spent so much money on this junk, you ungrateful users better start using it!
This is the same model that Meta declared was "too liberal" and had to specifically fine tune it with align with its Republican masters?
No thanks.
https://gizmodo.com/meta-says-its-latest-ai-model-is-less-wo...
No thanks.
https://gizmodo.com/meta-says-its-latest-ai-model-is-less-wo...
Same. Him and Meta really disgust me.
Classic Meta playbook, nothing innovative to build so let's just release a copy of ChatGPT
Great, now, can you get it the f* out of Whatsapp, please?
Imagine still using Meta products in 2025.
I own the meta glasses. I enjoy them. Last night, I asked meta to look at the menu and calculate the best meal by price. It calculated that the protein in the chicken Marsala was the best deal for the price. I then asked it to look at the wine menu and tell me a good dry wine that wouldn’t be too expensive. The wine list was over 100 wines and the answer retuned in seconds. I enjoyed the meal and the wine. I will continue to use the glasses in 2025 as I’m finding creative ways to use them.
I'll bookmark this as the saddest thing to do with food in 2025.
How does it know the affordability of a menu item? If it’s only looking at a menu the odds are that it doesn’t have a lot of information such as serving size and calorie cost. You just asked an AI to give the statically correct item for affordability.
The wine it chose was how far down the list? Was it chosen at random or did it just match “chicken wine” with the first result?
This seems like you’re assuming the glasses help you decide but really it probably did what anyone would do and pick a random option or just give you the popular choice. Why even use glasses for that and instead just point somewhere on the menu?
The wine it chose was how far down the list? Was it chosen at random or did it just match “chicken wine” with the first result?
This seems like you’re assuming the glasses help you decide but really it probably did what anyone would do and pick a random option or just give you the popular choice. Why even use glasses for that and instead just point somewhere on the menu?
It reasoned its choices. Told me the vineyard, what most people say about it. It gave me 3 food options originally and I said go by best value. It would be the same as if a friend recommended it to you or a server. How do I know the AI is giving me good advice? I don’t, but I’ve lived on earth long enough to know it’s not bad advice. End of day, the human makes the decision. We don’t lose agency unless we just say ok to everything. In this case, it was reasonable other cases maybe not. We still make decisions even if we use ai.
So in the spirit of not losing agency, out of the 3 items you told it best value, which appears to mean “lowest cost”. Best value can also mean portion size relative to cost. Further even relative to your diet restrictions and relative to the area of economic activity. All of those things I garuntee weren’t involved in the LLM “reasoning”. It’s okay to be wowed by sleight of hand LLM tricks, but expect everyone to be skeptical when you describe the situation.
The above criteria is how I would evaluate best value of menu items. If an LLM just gave me the cheapest of 3 dishes I wouldn’t use it because it is not adding any agency I already had.
Here’s another possible scenario:
The LLM retrieved “best value” or some relative synonym from the online review of the restaurant. The review says “I think the chicken marsala is the best value.” The review was posted 5 years ago and the portion sizes have changed when the new owner wanted to shrinkflate the food. Is chicken marsala still the best value? Was it ever the best value?
The above criteria is how I would evaluate best value of menu items. If an LLM just gave me the cheapest of 3 dishes I wouldn’t use it because it is not adding any agency I already had.
Here’s another possible scenario:
The LLM retrieved “best value” or some relative synonym from the online review of the restaurant. The review says “I think the chicken marsala is the best value.” The review was posted 5 years ago and the portion sizes have changed when the new owner wanted to shrinkflate the food. Is chicken marsala still the best value? Was it ever the best value?
I think it’s clear you don’t understand llm’s and how they operate. The data is trained on orthotic patterns. Your description would be the contrary of real world llm.
I'm trying very hard not to be judgemental, but this comment fascinated (or horrified) me.
I grew up with some relatively minor food insecurity, and so outsourcing my food and beverage choice to a soulless machine sounds like my own personal hell.
I grew up with some relatively minor food insecurity, and so outsourcing my food and beverage choice to a soulless machine sounds like my own personal hell.
All that fancy technology just to address an optimization problem that's entirely solvable with a can of Vienna sausages and a bottle of Two-Buck Chuck.
I will optimize for health next. That won’t be so easy.
Unless I'm really watching my budget (though, why would I be eating out at a place with a huge wine list and buying Meta glasses if that's the case?), I cannot possibly imagine the joy behind having a nice meal based on what AI told me is "the best deal" rather than trusting my own palate/gut and ordering what I know will bring me the greatest pleasure (or working with the sommelier to discuss my tastes and find something best-suited to both myself and my choice[s] of food).
You do you, by all means, if it brings you the most joy. But removing my own agency while allowing a company to track my entire dining experience to better serve me ads sounds so... hollow and dystopic.
You do you, by all means, if it brings you the most joy. But removing my own agency while allowing a company to track my entire dining experience to better serve me ads sounds so... hollow and dystopic.
This is what normal people used to discuss with the people they were eating with. Sad.
Thanks for providing a practical example of usage.
Made me tempted to buy one.
A question I have is, how are you presented with the prompt result?
Does it send you a message on your phone or does it tell you in a headphone?
And you you ask it verbally or can you also ask it using mobile phone?
Made me tempted to buy one.
A question I have is, how are you presented with the prompt result?
Does it send you a message on your phone or does it tell you in a headphone?
And you you ask it verbally or can you also ask it using mobile phone?
The glasses have audio, bone induction and tells you the answer without anybody really being able to hear.
You can do both text or audio.
You can do both text or audio.
And now Meta knows your location at that time, can use that lovely menu to derive ads better suited for its competition, has data on when you like to eat out, who else was there (let's not forget about DeepFace!), etc. While you ate your meal, you fed some juicy tidbits to their data repo on you and those around you.
Oh, hey, is that an ad for a local winery?
Oh, hey, is that an ad for a local winery?
I’m in favor of banning all ads too. That ain’t an argument against ai.
Do you really need a pair of glasses to tell you what to eat and drink? Wow, that must be the latest techie way to order food. A friendly reminder: you don't own those glasses, Meta does.
What does owning the glasses get me?
I agree with you apart from WhatsApp. I automatically know you’re from America if you don’t use WhatsApp.
This.
Never thought that once we had Skype we'll still not solve video calls cross-platform on every bloody device by 2025, including, but not limited to, linux, TVs, Android boxes, Chromecast with Google TV, and so on.
I really want to get off Whatsapp, but everyone simply refuses to do so out of simplicity, lazyness, and ignorance.
Signal is the easy and obvious alternative.
XMPP/Matrix are different paths that also work (and both rely on TURN/STUN, like everything), but that requires someone running those servers in your vicinity of friends.
Never thought that once we had Skype we'll still not solve video calls cross-platform on every bloody device by 2025, including, but not limited to, linux, TVs, Android boxes, Chromecast with Google TV, and so on.
I really want to get off Whatsapp, but everyone simply refuses to do so out of simplicity, lazyness, and ignorance.
Signal is the easy and obvious alternative.
XMPP/Matrix are different paths that also work (and both rely on TURN/STUN, like everything), but that requires someone running those servers in your vicinity of friends.
It’s not particularly popular in most of the Anglosphere.
I mean, every single person I know uses either WhatsApp/IG/FB
Why would I want my AI App to be by the privacy nightmare, cambridge analytica people?
AI is becoming more and more of a commodity. What does the FB one offer to make up for its terrible reputation?
AI is becoming more and more of a commodity. What does the FB one offer to make up for its terrible reputation?
> AI is becoming more and more of a commodity
Ironically in large part due to Meta releasing their models. For now at least, we'll see how long their commitment to open weights lasts when the time comes to actually justify the tens of billions they're spending on all this.
Ironically in large part due to Meta releasing their models. For now at least, we'll see how long their commitment to open weights lasts when the time comes to actually justify the tens of billions they're spending on all this.
who is using Llama 4 ?
I'll be curious to see if this has legs.
Maybe their audience is people who can’t be bothered or can’t afford it.