HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Gurgler

no profile record

comments

Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
There is a similar organization in the USA: Consumer Reports. It used to be a magazine, now I believe it's just a website. Entirely funded by subscription - and not advertisement or other sponsorship - they tackle entire categories of consumer goods in the USA, rigorously testing and ranking competing products across many metrics.
Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
There's a very legitimate case that I've seen made for soft-deletion in several different situations: foreign keys related to "created-by" columns. Hard-deleting a user who created an object that remains in use after they're gone would trigger referential integrity complaints on those columns. Without being able to reference a "deactivated" user's primary key in such a situation, you'd have to come up with some counterintuitive system for revisiting such objects. And the result (short of removing the foreign key) would be to give you inaccurate information about who created the object. Maybe one of you smarter people has already thought of an elegant way to handle this, but I've never seen one that satisfies my taste.
Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
Fear of such a tyranny of the majority is why the founders of the US created the electoral college, and apportioned the Senate as it is, creating a republic instead of a pure democracy. It also describes the original ideological distinction between Republicans and Democrats, the two main political parties in the US. James Madison described a scenario like this in his Federalist Paper #10.

"Complaints are everywhere ... that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority."
Gurgler
·4 anni fa·discuss
>“Crypto advertisers were quick to reign in ad spending...

I've been seeing this misspelling a lot lately. It's "rein in," as in causing a horse to slow down by pulling back on the reins.