Apple has a record $250B in the bank(arstechnica.com)
arstechnica.com
Apple has a record $250B in the bank
https://arstechnica.com/apple/2017/05/apple-has-a-record-250-billion-in-the-bank/
20 comments
No, it's all the massive taxes on repatriated profits. Apple doesn't even have $250B because it borrowed $78B to pay out as dividends.
When the 12% tax holiday is approved, almost all of that money comes back and most gets paid as dividends. You don't need it overseas for safety, and you don't need to burn $30B a year if your revenues disappear. A "skeleton crew" can spend a couple billion a year developing new profits in the nuclear meltdown scenario.
When the 12% tax holiday is approved, almost all of that money comes back and most gets paid as dividends. You don't need it overseas for safety, and you don't need to burn $30B a year if your revenues disappear. A "skeleton crew" can spend a couple billion a year developing new profits in the nuclear meltdown scenario.
You don't need it overseas for safety, you just keep more of it for safety.
You don't need $250B for "safety". Apple needs maybe $50B tops. If it has a bad year it's going to slash spending. It's got professional management that know pretty much how much it will make in a quarter and how much it can spend. It also has access to further financing, both debt and equity.
Repatriate the $250M, payoff the $78M in debt, and pay out at least $100M to shareholders. Apple will have over $100M in cash again by the end of the year.
Repatriate the $250M, payoff the $78M in debt, and pay out at least $100M to shareholders. Apple will have over $100M in cash again by the end of the year.
Apple's "burn rate" is about 33BN a year, which means that 250BN would give them ~5-6 years to find a new market in the event of a nuclear holocaust if they kept spending the same with ZERO income.
In your case, that burn rate would go down to $5 billion in a year or two. Apple justifies the burn rate because it's making a killing, when that stops...
Lower the corp tax and they'll repatriate the day after.
In your case, that burn rate would go down to $5 billion in a year or two. Apple justifies the burn rate because it's making a killing, when that stops...
Lower the corp tax and they'll repatriate the day after.
I think it's smart to keep cash... we're in economic boom right now with a lot of cheap money around. It will come handy when it's over
I can't help but think of Peter Thiel's very appropriate comments (admittedly targeting GOOG, but still applies) here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q26XIKtwXQ
As I read it: if AAPL had any idea at all what to do with this cash, they would deploy it. They are completely out of innovative ideas, and are just turning the product crank. Instead, they should return $$ to investors in the form of a dividend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q26XIKtwXQ
As I read it: if AAPL had any idea at all what to do with this cash, they would deploy it. They are completely out of innovative ideas, and are just turning the product crank. Instead, they should return $$ to investors in the form of a dividend.
How about starting their Innovative ideas does not require $250B?
But I have always wanted Apple to 1. Go into Property market. Not sure if that is possible for their choice of Location, but may be they should pick 50+ flagship store and actually own it.
2. Build a worldwide Neutral LTE / Wifi Network.
Both Huge in capital investment but offer a long term return.
But I have always wanted Apple to 1. Go into Property market. Not sure if that is possible for their choice of Location, but may be they should pick 50+ flagship store and actually own it.
2. Build a worldwide Neutral LTE / Wifi Network.
Both Huge in capital investment but offer a long term return.
They have, which is why they only have $160B in net cash. They will do more when allowed to repatriate it at a reasonable tax rate.
Yeah, how can you do anything just that little amount? /s
The could give their shareholders billions and still have plenty left over to do anything.
The could give their shareholders billions and still have plenty left over to do anything.
They've paid shareholders close to $100B and will pay more. But their hands are tied on most of the money until congress passes a tax holiday.
Maybe there is no need for them to buy anything right now?
But if they do that they are admitting they aren't innovative.. Catch-22.
You didn't justify the "should return" sentence: why should they?
Why does Apple need all that cash in the bank? Why not spending it in R&D or giving it to the shareholders?
Massive US tax penalties for doing either.
How about investing
They invest internationally. To invest in the US effectively requires surrendering 40% of that money to CA and the federal government first.
That's exactly what they're doing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braeburn_Capital.
If they really want to redistribute, they could reduce prices. They could return to shareholders, sure, but returning to the market (of their customers) would be more economically valuable.
With respect to the first it comes down to uncertainty and credit constraints. Since the credit issue is basically zero for thees companies then it likely comes down to uncertainty in the market.
They want to be shielded in the case of a huge crippling depression or global catastrophe. Apple's "burn rate" is about 33BN a year, which means that 250BN would give them ~5-6 years to find a new market in the event of a nuclear holocaust if they kept spending the same with ZERO income.
At the same time, just like Venture Investors, they are all waiting for the next transistor level market shift to happen - whether they can make it or otherwise. So they are plinking away with small investments on projects that are high risk to try and flush them out.
Pick your poison:
Nuclear
Biotech/Genetics
Artificial Intelligence
Augmented Reality
Space Mining
Etc...
It's really about making sure that APPL will be around in the year 2200 irrespective of everything else.
[1]https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/j...