Ask HN: Has Duckduckgo gotten worse recently?
44 comments
Unrelated but I wish they would rebrand already. Call it Duck, call it Go, call it something simple.
It's not an easy or memorable name at the moment, and branding matters.
It's not an easy or memorable name at the moment, and branding matters.
I can only guess that it come from the game "Duck, Duck, Goose", which is really easy to remember if you played it as a child.
Must be a US-centric cultural thing -- I always thought this was just a random sequence of words the creators thought would be memorable and / or cute!
I thankfully watched the Simpsons, where that game was referenced once. So I got the pun after only a year or so.
I played that as a kid and never once connected it to the search engine.
I really think it's a poor name choice
I really think it's a poor name choice
Even worse as name only suggests US? game for kids. Users should be from all over the world.
It's a mouthful, but it's certainly sensible to me. Searching the web tends to be a lot like "duck duck goose".
Disclaimer: I work for DDG.
I'd be interested in looking into any examples of searches where the results aren't good enough or where it seems to have gotten worse recently.
As far as I know there haven't been any changes over the past few weeks that would have made things worse.
I'd be interested in looking into any examples of searches where the results aren't good enough or where it seems to have gotten worse recently.
As far as I know there haven't been any changes over the past few weeks that would have made things worse.
Why does DDG only seem to search videos via Youtube, even with Safe Search set to off?
I live in the UK and with our internet laws here becoming more and more strict over the last few (and coming) years, I wanted an alternative to Google or Bing who both actively cooperate with the governments existing proclivity to censor things like Porn.
Bing's video search for pornography is absolutely fantastic, it's legitimately the one thing I use Bing for.
I live in the UK and with our internet laws here becoming more and more strict over the last few (and coming) years, I wanted an alternative to Google or Bing who both actively cooperate with the governments existing proclivity to censor things like Porn.
Bing's video search for pornography is absolutely fantastic, it's legitimately the one thing I use Bing for.
thank you for bangs. changed my entire web browsing experience.
Here's one I searched for just today: "helium" "futures"
DDG returns 2 results.[1] Google returns 369,000.[2]
Here's another one: "opec" "rebalancing" "peak"
DDG returns 0 results.[3] Google returns 319,000.[4]
There have been many, many others. I can email you them as I run in to them, if you want. Just let me know what email address to use.
Also, just to clarify, I noticed the change maybe 3 or 4 months (not weeks) ago.
[1] - https://duckduckgo.com/lite/?q="helium"%20"futures"&kd=-1
[2] - https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22helium%22%20%...
[3] - https://duckduckgo.com/lite/?q="opec"%20"rebalancing"%20"pea...
[4] - https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22opec%22%20%22...
DDG returns 2 results.[1] Google returns 369,000.[2]
Here's another one: "opec" "rebalancing" "peak"
DDG returns 0 results.[3] Google returns 319,000.[4]
There have been many, many others. I can email you them as I run in to them, if you want. Just let me know what email address to use.
Also, just to clarify, I noticed the change maybe 3 or 4 months (not weeks) ago.
[1] - https://duckduckgo.com/lite/?q="helium"%20"futures"&kd=-1
[2] - https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22helium%22%20%...
[3] - https://duckduckgo.com/lite/?q="opec"%20"rebalancing"%20"pea...
[4] - https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22opec%22%20%22...
Just be aware that Google's "hits" number is a wild overestimate. For example, the "helium" "futures" search actually only returns 222 pages (which is obviously still much higher than DDG): https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22helium%22%20%.... Likewise, the "opec" "rebalancing" "peak" returns only 264: https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22opec%22%20%22...
Thanks, these are helpful. Is it mostly searches with quoted words?
[email protected]
[email protected]
Yeah, I use quotes a lot because otherwise I find the results are pretty poor (ie. they seem to be more likely to miss at least one of the terms I searched for, and if I'm searching for a phrase then an unquoted phrase could have its words scattered all over the place rather than be treated as a phrase).
This was in fact an issue with queries containing quotes on our /lite and /html sites. It should be fixed now. Let me know if you see any other issues.
What happened is we frequently get hit by bots trying to scrape the links from our /lite and /html sites and we have to react by creating rules to try to block them. This particular rule, was over-aggressive. Our ops team is going to discuss internally how to prevent something like this from happening again.
Thanks!
What happened is we frequently get hit by bots trying to scrape the links from our /lite and /html sites and we have to react by creating rules to try to block them. This particular rule, was over-aggressive. Our ops team is going to discuss internally how to prevent something like this from happening again.
Thanks!
Thank you. I appreciate you responding personally, taking this seriously, and providing a quick fix.
I guess the problem only occurs with the lite version? At least for me, removing the /lite/ part in the URL results in far more results.
I noticed about a week or two ago that I was always leaning toward !g as well. I have been testing out my own instance of searx. I have yet to specify using google with it, since it already uses google results.
https://github.com/asciimoo/searx
https://github.com/asciimoo/searx
I've actually noticed the opposite; I've been resorting to !g much less.
I agree with this as well. I tried using Duckduckgo around a year and a half ago or two years ago and abandoned it due to poor search results, but I began using it again a couple months ago and it seemed much improved.
Ha! I had the exact opposite.
I used DDG a while when it was introduced. But returned back to google since the results were no as good.
But recently I was feeling googles results has got a lot worse and gave DDG another try.
Big difference! Like Google vs Yahoo back in the days.
Now DDG is my default search.
I used DDG a while when it was introduced. But returned back to google since the results were no as good.
But recently I was feeling googles results has got a lot worse and gave DDG another try.
Big difference! Like Google vs Yahoo back in the days.
Now DDG is my default search.
Duckduckgo is my default at work and on my phone. I love it for quick programming questions and usually everything else is fine but if I'm doing any design and need images I usually for some reason head to google but for everything else I'd rather not have google turn my query into my next YouTube ad2 seconds later..
Weird, I've been feeling like the same thing has been happening, just noticed over the last couple of weeks that it doesn't seem to find what I want.
I'm in the UK and noticed I often seem to be getting US centric results and have to try using Google more often.
Edit: ddg has been my default for 2 years.
I'm in the UK and noticed I often seem to be getting US centric results and have to try using Google more often.
Edit: ddg has been my default for 2 years.
I've noticed it's results have gotten much better. Now if there were a version of the Personal Blocklist chrome plugin for it(so I don't see crap from W3Schools, WebMD, or Livestrong, etc.), I would never use Google again.
I just switched over to DDG because I was getting Google's human detector + classify these images nearly every search.
I guess my estimated worth to Google must be fairly low because I don't click on many ads and I often use a work VPN.
I guess my estimated worth to Google must be fairly low because I don't click on many ads and I often use a work VPN.
I have been using g! much more for programming.
I was hoping to build an extension for DDG a few months back, but things seemed to have changed in the forum.
This could explain why we are seeing changes.
I was hoping to build an extension for DDG a few months back, but things seemed to have changed in the forum.
This could explain why we are seeing changes.
I have been using DDG as a daily driver for my programming. If i don't get a answer then only i use google. DDG works for like 80% of the cases.
I've always had to !g for programming I wish there was a !code option that would improve searching for code / programming related searches or something?
!so narrows your Duck Duck Go search to Stack Overflow.
!code seems to go to searchcode.com for me.
What is g! if I may ask?
I've personally had the opposite, I've been getting better results over the last year and I'm using !g very rarely now.
I've recently wrote yet another ddg API wrapper for python https://github.com/alvations/rubberduck. I'm loving how I can browse the web in jupyter notebook. Oh the irony of having jupyter on a browser and calling an API to get search results
For searches containing multiple words, code or error messages I resort to google as ddg doesn't find the relevant pages.
Other than that it's a lot better than before.
i've noticed this too and its fucking with my mind, since i end up using !g in a private window and not having the history (the whole point of being not tracked)
I did the switch 2 weeks ago, I'm actually enjoying it!
I had a problem with a chrome extension hanging DDG from displaying results, but otherwise seems awesome as usual on mobile and desktop.
Perhaps they should let the user choose the search algorithm. Make it an option somewhere.
I hope it keeps getting better.
I too feel the results have been poor of late. I think Google probably "knows" the type of questions you look for (ie. usually on stack overflow for programming questions, or whatever most popular links people are clicking on around that time).
If I'm looking for something very esoteric, I can tell straight away that DDG doesn't understand my query from its results and I go over to Google and find the answer on the first, second or third page.
Has anyone else noticed this? Or is it just me?
Has anything changed at DDG that might account for this?