Exploring Previously Unknown Remote Kernel Bugs Affecting Android Phones(pleasestopnamingvulnerabilities.com)
pleasestopnamingvulnerabilities.com
Exploring Previously Unknown Remote Kernel Bugs Affecting Android Phones
https://pleasestopnamingvulnerabilities.com/
31 comments
that caught my eye too, anyone have a rough estimate for what sort of profitability one could expect from full time work in this field?
If you're good at exploit dev? You can take however much money you want.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitfinex-hacked-hongkong/...
If you're a world class exploit developer working full time, expect earn a few hundred million $ per year.
Of course there exists a whole industry full of people that'll offer you silly 6 digit salaries.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitfinex-hacked-hongkong/...
If you're a world class exploit developer working full time, expect earn a few hundred million $ per year.
Of course there exists a whole industry full of people that'll offer you silly 6 digit salaries.
source plz. for white hats, I mean
Probably depends on how willing you are to live and work in China.
Oh, I mean I guess you can probably find some country that'll be able to work out a profit-sharing agreement with you and allow you to legally steal money.
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/evgeniy-mikhailovich-bogach...
This guy is a good example of someone with a decent career in infosec operating on the right side of the law (Within his own jurisdiction, anyway).
If you want to do charity reporting bugs, then you obviously will get paid like charity workers do.
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/evgeniy-mikhailovich-bogach...
This guy is a good example of someone with a decent career in infosec operating on the right side of the law (Within his own jurisdiction, anyway).
If you want to do charity reporting bugs, then you obviously will get paid like charity workers do.
The question probably wasn't about whether an exploit specialist could net a lot of money, but rather, your claim of "a few hundred million $ per year". That's pretty extraordinary.
How is it extraordinary? Cryptocurrency heists of that scale happen regularly.
Wire fraud in the high tens of millions is a daily thing. Shit out a OWA RCE bug and you can make billions swapping out bank account info in emails.
All the money in the world is controlled by insecure computers, of course skilled exploit devs can drown themselves in it.
Wire fraud in the high tens of millions is a daily thing. Shit out a OWA RCE bug and you can make billions swapping out bank account info in emails.
All the money in the world is controlled by insecure computers, of course skilled exploit devs can drown themselves in it.
You are describing rare, single digit numbers of events that netted enough to be characterized as hundreds of millions / year for a short time period. That's "extraordinary". Meaning that skill alone doesn't guarantee that earning level.
Generally, single digit millions/year seems a reasonable expectation for a very talented (and ethically flexible) exploit practitioner. Beyond that requires luck and right place / right time.
Generally, single digit millions/year seems a reasonable expectation for a very talented (and ethically flexible) exploit practitioner. Beyond that requires luck and right place / right time.
Wire fraud is not rare. You can steal tens of millions by hacking a single companies webmail.
It doesn’t even have to be a company with any infosec staff, think any big factory or a mine. Large wire transfers over email are a daily thing.
I truly believe that the amount of people that could earn hundreds of millions a year doing this full time isn’t even that small.
It doesn’t even have to be a company with any infosec staff, think any big factory or a mine. Large wire transfers over email are a daily thing.
I truly believe that the amount of people that could earn hundreds of millions a year doing this full time isn’t even that small.
Hundreds of millions, per year, to a single exploit specialist, is. Not arguing your general point of financial benefit for world class exploit specialists. Just arguing the scale.
The most famous one I'm aware of got $100M over two years and didn't get to keep it. http://fortune.com/2017/04/27/facebook-google-rimasauskas/
The most famous one I'm aware of got $100M over two years and didn't get to keep it. http://fortune.com/2017/04/27/facebook-google-rimasauskas/
Sure, I would expect that most people doing this sort of work don’t actually work full time.
But the amounts of money you could steal with relatively little work are truly immense.
>The most famous one I'm aware of got $100M over two years and didn't get to keep it. >http://fortune.com/2017/04/27/facebook-google-rimasauskas/
This guy seems to be the polar opposite of a world class exploit dev, but he got pretty far.
However he was also a pretty small player, I’m on my phone now but I’ll try to post some useful links in the morning.
But the amounts of money you could steal with relatively little work are truly immense.
>The most famous one I'm aware of got $100M over two years and didn't get to keep it. >http://fortune.com/2017/04/27/facebook-google-rimasauskas/
This guy seems to be the polar opposite of a world class exploit dev, but he got pretty far.
However he was also a pretty small player, I’m on my phone now but I’ll try to post some useful links in the morning.
>This guy seems to be the polar opposite of a world class exploit dev
Stealing $100M over two years from FB and Google? Sounds world class to me. Social engineering isn't an inferior skill to actual code exploits.
Stealing $100M over two years from FB and Google? Sounds world class to me. Social engineering isn't an inferior skill to actual code exploits.
Google doesn’t support app purchases in China.
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2017-02-06/google-...
This has created a strange ecosystem for app stores in China, which depend on vulnerability exploitation in varying degrees for installation privileges.
Maybe some of the work is dual use, but the primary motivation for funding this kind of vuln discovery and exploit development seems to have been App Store ecosystem development in China.
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2017-02-06/google-...
This has created a strange ecosystem for app stores in China, which depend on vulnerability exploitation in varying degrees for installation privileges.
Maybe some of the work is dual use, but the primary motivation for funding this kind of vuln discovery and exploit development seems to have been App Store ecosystem development in China.
> This has created a strange ecosystem for app stores in China, which depend on vulnerability exploitation in varying degrees for installation privileges.
Can you explain that a bit more? 3rd party app stores are legitimate on Android, so why would they depend on vulnerability exploitation?
Can you explain that a bit more? 3rd party app stores are legitimate on Android, so why would they depend on vulnerability exploitation?
I am a little unclear on why they operate the way they do, but the k33n team guys are all employed by Tencent. I’ve asked them about it and this was the rationale they presented.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tencent
> There are teams of full-time Chinese researchers looking for and reporting vulnerabilities in Android? Are they doing this to win the bug bounties?
I hope you are being sarcastic; guess again!
I hope you are being sarcastic; guess again!
I hope it's Google's bug bounty program that's paying off.
If they were black-hat researchers, they wouldn't have reported the vulnerabilities to Google, and thus the researcher's reports wouldn't be considered duplicates.
My guess is they're either working for the bug bounties, or they're employed by a company that uses Android extensively and wants to make sure its secure.
My guess is they're either working for the bug bounties, or they're employed by a company that uses Android extensively and wants to make sure its secure.
Exploring the acknowledgements [0] shows many of these Chinese researchers are working for the big internet firms there (Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu), so my guess is they are more motivated in securing Android for internal use than collecting bounties (its entirely possible they run their own AOSP-based Android builds for employee-provided hardware).
Being China, its also possible that the Chinese government indirectly or directly sponsors this research, since Android is by far the most common smartphone OS there.
edit: C0RE Team [1], who also has many contributions seems to be an independent research company, who may be doing it just for the bounties.
[0] https://source.android.com/security/overview/acknowledgement...
[1] http://c0reteam.org/about.html
Being China, its also possible that the Chinese government indirectly or directly sponsors this research, since Android is by far the most common smartphone OS there.
edit: C0RE Team [1], who also has many contributions seems to be an independent research company, who may be doing it just for the bounties.
[0] https://source.android.com/security/overview/acknowledgement...
[1] http://c0reteam.org/about.html
An interesting exercise would be to compile notification dates with code commit dates, and then compare the average difference (notification date - commit date) among groups.
If there's a discrepancy, then that's possible evidence one group might be hoarding bugs, or at least waiting for notification approval from, e.g., a domestic intelligence agency.
If there's a discrepancy, then that's possible evidence one group might be hoarding bugs, or at least waiting for notification approval from, e.g., a domestic intelligence agency.
cue commit scrubbers
The article mention hundreds of thousands of lines of code, where they couldn't even find the entry point to begin debugging. In a single wifi driver (that's not even considering the firmware)
sometimes infosec seems the most dreadful field.
sometimes infosec seems the most dreadful field.
What is a vuln name, other than a binding of a CVE to a real word to make it easier to reference or promote.
It draws public attention to an issue better than any CVE-2017-XXXXX would do.
No, keep it up. Dictionary words are far easier to remember than specific numbers.
It draws public attention to an issue better than any CVE-2017-XXXXX would do.
No, keep it up. Dictionary words are far easier to remember than specific numbers.
I think it's better over the long run to keep the CVE as the "canonical" name and just treat the others like nicknames. Instead we have branding, logos, domain names etc. Some argue that it's easier to get attention or shame a vendor by going all-out, but it seems like overkill for a simple mnemonic.
I think a lot of it is that there are folks who want to contribute to security awareness, and their skills lie with design/branding rather than with low level security concepts.
I can't speak for what the value-add is there, but I don't see any harm from it.
I can't speak for what the value-add is there, but I don't see any harm from it.
Well done to the author. I always found working on more obscure systems to be a lot more entertaining as a hobby and I'd definitely recommend it -- you'll almost never run into the issue of another researcher coming out with something first. Most security researchers seem to shy away from embedded VR due to an unjustified fear of obscure assembly languages and hardware (or perhaps they just realize there's no money in it...), but isn't nearly as hard as anyone thinks.
I expect to see drastically more work into IoT devices once tooling and knowledge sharing gets better. A lot of the articles right now begin and end with binwalk. Great tool but that's just the start.
The only hard part of embedded work is that it's really, really difficult to collaborate with anyone as VR is always filled with incredible drama and the talent pool of individuals willing to work on this (for free) with the prerequisite knowledge is almost non-existent.
Good luck. And thanks for not coming out with another media campaign first and interesting research second.
I expect to see drastically more work into IoT devices once tooling and knowledge sharing gets better. A lot of the articles right now begin and end with binwalk. Great tool but that's just the start.
The only hard part of embedded work is that it's really, really difficult to collaborate with anyone as VR is always filled with incredible drama and the talent pool of individuals willing to work on this (for free) with the prerequisite knowledge is almost non-existent.
Good luck. And thanks for not coming out with another media campaign first and interesting research second.
The PLEASESTOPNAMINGVULNERABILITIES vulnerabilities are surely of a different type than the KRACK attack.
fascinating write up. Is it normal for wifi-drivers to have such an enormous code base? like, nearly 700k loc? And how much of it is generated code? I'd love any links to stuff on this if anyone has them and time to post, thanks.
Generated code can really build up quick. And that's not taking into account the transformations from higher level languages down to op codes. I use a lot of code gen and some projects I manage ~50k loc which can balloon to 10x that.
The exploits i'd bet are still in the human written weird stuff and not unfolded loops and boring setters/getters.
The exploits i'd bet are still in the human written weird stuff and not unfolded loops and boring setters/getters.
Aw I can't take the quiz?
https://pleasestopnamingvulnerabilities.com/integers.html
https://pleasestopnamingvulnerabilities.com/integers.html
This isn't really the main focus of the article, but I find this really interesting. There are teams of full-time Chinese researchers looking for and reporting vulnerabilities in Android? Are they doing this to win the bug bounties? If so, it sounds like Google's bug bounty program is really paying off.