Why Are So Few Male Students Studying Abroad?(theatlantic.com)
theatlantic.com
Why Are So Few Male Students Studying Abroad?
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/02/male-students-studying-abroad/583828/
4 comments
I don't see any claim in either article that men are inferior or lazy. One can just as easily interpret issues regarding male performance in school as being cultural or societal, or even systemic - that both men and women are being "set up to fail" in different ways. Even the New York Times article linked to in the other HN thread (and the thread itself) suggests not that male students are lazy or inferior, but that the incentives created by the way genders are socialized lead to those different outcomes.
You claim to want to have a serious discussion about gender outcomes, but rather than doing so, you're just complaining about the way people treat you from behind a throwaway account and, in my opinion, a "narrative bias" that exists more in your interpretation than the actual text.
Do you believe these articles are outright lying? That male students don't underperform versus female students, or that male students don't study abroad less often than female students? If you believe the sociological trends exist as described, to what do you attribute them, and what solutions do you feel might best address them?
You claim to want to have a serious discussion about gender outcomes, but rather than doing so, you're just complaining about the way people treat you from behind a throwaway account and, in my opinion, a "narrative bias" that exists more in your interpretation than the actual text.
Do you believe these articles are outright lying? That male students don't underperform versus female students, or that male students don't study abroad less often than female students? If you believe the sociological trends exist as described, to what do you attribute them, and what solutions do you feel might best address them?
I don't doubt the trends that are being reported. As I said, I dispute the narrative being fit to the data:
> Samantha Brandauer, who runs Dickinson College’s study-abroad office, told me she has experienced this firsthand. In her past job at Gettysburg College, she teamed up with a colleague to convene student focus groups on why men didn’t go abroad and what the college could do about it. What she discovered was a “bro mentality” among men in college—a culture in which male students don’t want to leave their friends to study abroad and are heavily influenced by their classmates in making choices about what to do in college. “Part of this is a messaging problem, because the way we talk about study abroad as a transformative experience just doesn’t resonate with college-age men,” Brandauer says. “They don’t want to be transformed.”
I may have missed something in my reading, but to my eye this is the only explanation offered for this trend in this article. And in my estimation, this is a lazy explanation that fits a political narrative a little too easily.
And yes, I am hiding behind a thowaway account, but I’m not complaining about treatment of me or people like me. This is a trend I’ve noticed in articles that blur the boundary between editorial and reporting, and I don’t think it is fair to anyone.
> Samantha Brandauer, who runs Dickinson College’s study-abroad office, told me she has experienced this firsthand. In her past job at Gettysburg College, she teamed up with a colleague to convene student focus groups on why men didn’t go abroad and what the college could do about it. What she discovered was a “bro mentality” among men in college—a culture in which male students don’t want to leave their friends to study abroad and are heavily influenced by their classmates in making choices about what to do in college. “Part of this is a messaging problem, because the way we talk about study abroad as a transformative experience just doesn’t resonate with college-age men,” Brandauer says. “They don’t want to be transformed.”
I may have missed something in my reading, but to my eye this is the only explanation offered for this trend in this article. And in my estimation, this is a lazy explanation that fits a political narrative a little too easily.
And yes, I am hiding behind a thowaway account, but I’m not complaining about treatment of me or people like me. This is a trend I’ve noticed in articles that blur the boundary between editorial and reporting, and I don’t think it is fair to anyone.
I was so bummed when I looked into this in college. Going for a physics degree, there was basically nowhere I could go in the spanish speaking world with classes that counted towards my degree. Which is nuts, since physics is a degree almost everywhere.
Fewer male students study abroad? It’s that are lazy.
Or this one from the other day: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19275394
Girls are much harder working and get better grades in school, but lose out in the office because they don’t know how to skate through with minimal effort the ways boys are taught to do.
I mean, can we seriously discuss gender outcomes that don’t reduce to:
- when males are on the losing end, it’s because they are inferior in some way
- when women are on the losing end, it’s because they have been set up to fail.
Sadly, any real discussion of the narrative bias gets you branded a “men’s rights” activist and dismissed as a crank.