Nasa Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight(science.sciencemag.org)
science.sciencemag.org
Nasa Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/364/6436/eaau8650
23 comments
It’s not a study, but it’s been hypothesized that radiation and cosmic rays could cause lasting damage of just this sort through particle showers within the brain. Truthfully though there is very little in the way of studies for the simple fact that it’s hard to set one up for astronauts. Given how radically different the environment in space is compared to Earth though, I’m not finding this surprising. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s just the tip of a very dangerous iceberg too, and it turns out that it takes a lot of time and sacrifice to get us to live and thrive somewhere other than Earth’s surface.
We have a small sample size of humans who have been exposed to space. I wonder what human mutations will be more preferable for space travel. Physical fitness is part of the equation but so is genetic-space compatibility.
Agreed. Genentic engineering will probably be helpful, but first we do as you say, have to know what to engineer for. Then of course we’ll have a kind of speciation event and we’ll risk having a kind of genetic apartheid based on people who work in space vs. planetside. It could get sci-fi dystopia levels of ugly if we don’t work to prevent those outcomes.
We already limit astronauts and many other professions based on genetic properties: height, tollerance to high g-forces, eyesight etc. Even things used as health indicators like resting blood pressure are influenced to a significant degree by genetics.
I think we will survive adding a few more genetic properties to the job requirements, especially since jobs on planets will vastly outnumber jobs in outer space for the forseeable future.
I think we will survive adding a few more genetic properties to the job requirements, especially since jobs on planets will vastly outnumber jobs in outer space for the forseeable future.
Sounds like Gattaca. It a very slippery slope when you start to genetically engineering people.
How do you engineer for space? Increasing telomere length is merely a stop-gap. Random mutations due to solar radiation are exactly the mechanism that evolution exploits to make progress (as well as other sources of entropy), the chemical makeup of DNA is poorly suited to space travel: you can't just genetically engineer that way.
You shorten the inter-generational period, i.e. make people breed rapidly (in space). The mutations will take of themselves.
Seems equally likely this is related to prolonged periods of relative isolation as much as being in space
They should have put the twin on earth in a simulates space station for a year. Also maybe the lack of bacterial biodiversity was a factor. I used to work analyzing DNA sequences of gut bacteria of MS patients. Surprisingly enough, bacteria affects many things about you, including cognitive performance.
I think the point of the study is to see the effects of space when compared to a normal life on Earth, not compared to a life on Earth in similar conditions.
I wonder if they've equally tested brain performance changes in low-stimulus environments such as an equally isolated cell in a prison on earth. Human senses exposed to variety of stimuli on earth may be keeping the brain more alert than what the space capsule offers.
Oh hey, I was a control for part of that (specifically, short term memory and mental math).
It's possible that he was still just tired after all that. I wouldn't read too far into a study with an N of 1.
It's possible that he was still just tired after all that. I wouldn't read too far into a study with an N of 1.
> [S]patial orientation and motor praxis accuracy increased...cognitive speed decreased.
It's too bad they didn't measure if TW's become empathic vs. HR. I guess we'll never know how well he's at piloting giant robots.
It's too bad they didn't measure if TW's become empathic vs. HR. I guess we'll never know how well he's at piloting giant robots.
It's interesting that there's no mention of sperm count.
I mean, given that the US government funded studies where state prisoners in Oregon and Washington sat on X-ray machines. After tracking the time course of sperm-count recovery, prisoners' testicles were typically removed. This was back in the 60s, in support of the space program.
https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/achre/commeet/meet8/...
I mean, given that the US government funded studies where state prisoners in Oregon and Washington sat on X-ray machines. After tracking the time course of sperm-count recovery, prisoners' testicles were typically removed. This was back in the 60s, in support of the space program.
https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/achre/commeet/meet8/...
Interesting that telomere length increased by 14% during flight! And, it can’t be related to a healthy lifestyle since they got shorter within 48hrs back on earth?
Notably, telomere length shortened rapidly upon TW’s return to Earth, within ~48 hours [FD340 ambient return to R+0 (R+ days post return); fig. S6B] and stabilized to near preflight averages within months.
Notably, telomere length shortened rapidly upon TW’s return to Earth, within ~48 hours [FD340 ambient return to R+0 (R+ days post return); fig. S6B] and stabilized to near preflight averages within months.
I am not a doctor, but my understanding is that increasing telomere length could contribute to the severity of malignant tumors.
or increase life length!? Space hypersleep might become a thing after all.
It's a double edged sword. Increased telomere length will not only make it easier for your normal cells to divide more, it makes it easier for cancer cells to divide more. It's actually an anti-cancer adaptation for some mammals to turn off their telomere repair.
I'm impressed by the paper's 16 co-first authors and 13 co-last corresponding authors. While something like this might be more routine in a field like physics, it's a good look for biology and I hope the trend of sharing credit continues.
I got coauthored for formatting my coworker’s paper with LateX in the field of computational biology. So don’t get too excited.
The standards for authorship in this study were pretty strict. Something like ~2 supplementary figures just for a co-authorship.
Source: I'm in one of the labs on this paper (but not one of the authors)
Source: I'm in one of the labs on this paper (but not one of the authors)
This is terrifying to me. I hadn't heard of spaceflight (or the return from it) affecting cognitive function before, but they don't seem to be making it a major issue here - even after it persisted six months later. Does anyone have older sources showing the same thing? I would especially be interested in studies showing the effect over multiple flights and returns to Earth.