> I also loved Louisa Gilder’s The Age of Entanglement and Kip Thorne’s Black Holes and Time Warps. That one was slow for me, but it was like being in the kind of physics class I always dreamed of taking. At Harvard I had taken a class, Physics for Poets. The professor said in an impatient way, “If you can’t follow the math, then you don’t have to, but I can’t really explain it without the math, so just do the best you can.”
And this is true. You can't learn physics by listening to a physicist talk or by reading popular science books. The title of the article gave me the impression that the author picked up a university-level book in physics and worked through it. As far as reading popular science goes, I think a lot of SF authors do that. And there are also SF authors who dig deeply into the science they write about (e.g., Greg Egan, Peter Watts, etc.).
> I also loved Louisa Gilder’s The Age of Entanglement and Kip Thorne’s Black Holes and Time Warps. That one was slow for me, but it was like being in the kind of physics class I always dreamed of taking. At Harvard I had taken a class, Physics for Poets. The professor said in an impatient way, “If you can’t follow the math, then you don’t have to, but I can’t really explain it without the math, so just do the best you can.”
And this is true. You can't learn physics by listening to a physicist talk or by reading popular science books. The title of the article gave me the impression that the author picked up a university-level book in physics and worked through it. As far as reading popular science goes, I think a lot of SF authors do that. And there are also SF authors who dig deeply into the science they write about (e.g., Greg Egan, Peter Watts, etc.).