Bezos’ Girlfriend Gave Texts to Brother Who Leaked to National Enquirer(wsj.com)
wsj.com
Bezos’ Girlfriend Gave Texts to Brother Who Leaked to National Enquirer
https://www.wsj.com/articles/prosecutors-have-evidence-bezos-girlfriend-gave-texts-to-brother-who-leaked-to-national-enquirer-11579908912
21 comments
I remember readinh about this a few months ago when the story came out. How is this newsworthy now?
Because of the recent reports that Bezos’ phone may have been hacked by a WhatsApp message sent by the Saudi crown prince 5 months before the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. I read the forensics report and it is far from conclusive, the mistress is a much more plausible explanation of how the tabloid got his dick pics. What kind of low-life shares her boyfriend’s intimate photos with her brother?
An expensive ($25B) mistake for Bezos. As Benjamin Franklin said “experience keeps a dear school, but fools will learn in no other”.
An expensive ($25B) mistake for Bezos. As Benjamin Franklin said “experience keeps a dear school, but fools will learn in no other”.
SA probably hacked his phone, but not to get his saucy text messages. Khashoggi was a WaPo reporter, which Bezos owns.
> Side piece, never worth it. Gotta lie and sneak. Why go out for steak when you got tacos at home?
While I'm not averse to the Man finding happiness in other relationships than who he was married to for so long, its Natural people change and grow apart, what did irk me was when I realized this guy was trying to parade himself around LA with his has-been weather girl (I grew up in SoCal and recognized her face but didn't know where until I went back home and it was 'Newsworthy') instead of working on New Glenn.
Especially when I realized the death of ULA/SLS relies on Blue Origin on actually producing some results, which when you realize it was created 2 years before SpaceX is very disappointing.
I wonder if he will do what all powerful Men eventually do and just keep their private life, just that, Private: him openly being the (reported) richest Man on the planet has a lot of OPSEC issues, and this happening is not really that surprising. What is surprising is how rather than bring about unwanted attention, and additional vulnerabilities into the equation, he didn't just participate in the vetted high class escort route like most powerful, busy, affluent CEOs where discretion is paramount.
The thing is... his 'tacos' went to Princeton and is still worth Billions after (pledging?) donating half of it to charity. But such is the Human condition, I suppose.
While I'm not averse to the Man finding happiness in other relationships than who he was married to for so long, its Natural people change and grow apart, what did irk me was when I realized this guy was trying to parade himself around LA with his has-been weather girl (I grew up in SoCal and recognized her face but didn't know where until I went back home and it was 'Newsworthy') instead of working on New Glenn.
Especially when I realized the death of ULA/SLS relies on Blue Origin on actually producing some results, which when you realize it was created 2 years before SpaceX is very disappointing.
I wonder if he will do what all powerful Men eventually do and just keep their private life, just that, Private: him openly being the (reported) richest Man on the planet has a lot of OPSEC issues, and this happening is not really that surprising. What is surprising is how rather than bring about unwanted attention, and additional vulnerabilities into the equation, he didn't just participate in the vetted high class escort route like most powerful, busy, affluent CEOs where discretion is paramount.
The thing is... his 'tacos' went to Princeton and is still worth Billions after (pledging?) donating half of it to charity. But such is the Human condition, I suppose.
I believe at least 50% of attraction is spending time together and learning about other person. That would explain why flings with secretaries are so common.
What's the likelihood that both MBS and AMI were doing this independently?
It's plausible that one (or none) of the reports is wrong, but which is more likely?
It's plausible that one (or none) of the reports is wrong, but which is more likely?
Sounds like "this" are two separate things.
One is malware, the other an abuse of trust (but not a software error).
So yes I'd say it is plausible the two independently occurred.
One is malware, the other an abuse of trust (but not a software error).
So yes I'd say it is plausible the two independently occurred.
>Sign in to read more
No thank you.
No thank you.
ex* girlfriend
quackernews(1)