Elon Musk can easily improve free speech on Twitter(marinsborg.com)
marinsborg.com
Elon Musk can easily improve free speech on Twitter
https://www.marinsborg.com/elon-musk-twitter/
4 comments
" Why engage with someone when you can just discredit them for not providing a link to a study with a title and abstract that you won't actually use to re-evaluate your own position?"
You are right, however when people are parroting their "opinions and own researches" on some more important topics like Covid-19 I guess you should not engage with someone without any source.
You are right, however when people are parroting their "opinions and own researches" on some more important topics like Covid-19 I guess you should not engage with someone without any source.
The original title: "How Elon Musk can improve free speech on Twitter?"
But I approve the title, just like I approve the simple, technological solution to a complex situation with lots of stakeholders and widely varying points of view! Because this article is premised on Mush already having acquired Twitter, and open sourcing Twitters "algorithm", which is of course, explicit and easily delineated.
I assume that Elon Musk, the Richest, and therefore the Smartest, Man in the World will take up this sage technological solution to a societal problem! He has no other choice! He must!
But I approve the title, just like I approve the simple, technological solution to a complex situation with lots of stakeholders and widely varying points of view! Because this article is premised on Mush already having acquired Twitter, and open sourcing Twitters "algorithm", which is of course, explicit and easily delineated.
I assume that Elon Musk, the Richest, and therefore the Smartest, Man in the World will take up this sage technological solution to a societal problem! He has no other choice! He must!
Yea I messed up the original title. This post is semi-satire. Like it proposes a solution to a problem but it is simplified so much that it is wrong.
In fact, I would say that the mindset of demanding a source for claims is counterproductive and stifles thought. Why engage with someone when you can just discredit them for not providing a link to a study with a title and abstract that you won't actually use to re-evaluate your own position?