Ask HN: Aging and learning. Does it become more difficult?
45 comments
I’m 67 and don’t have any trouble learning new things. My priorities change. I’m not willing to waste time on certain topics now but will spend hours on others. The claim that “old people” can’t learn effectively is a myth and has been shown as such by numerous studies.
I think that the truth is somewhere in the middle.
I've met people in their 60s who distro-hopped over a dozen+ linux distributions just to see what they're like, as I did in my teens, and also priced out a 3d printer from numerous options until settling on one that they bought and used to tinker and make many useful things for their home (something I only wish I could have done in my teens but 3d printers weren't available then.)
But they like you, are the minority, not the majority. Most people slow down and at some point stop learning new things and cruise on what they know until they die or hit a wall of obsolescence and then die.
'Many people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75' is a very real, very sad thing.
Kudos to you for continuing to learn new things, it's truly inspirational.
I've met people in their 60s who distro-hopped over a dozen+ linux distributions just to see what they're like, as I did in my teens, and also priced out a 3d printer from numerous options until settling on one that they bought and used to tinker and make many useful things for their home (something I only wish I could have done in my teens but 3d printers weren't available then.)
But they like you, are the minority, not the majority. Most people slow down and at some point stop learning new things and cruise on what they know until they die or hit a wall of obsolescence and then die.
'Many people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75' is a very real, very sad thing.
Kudos to you for continuing to learn new things, it's truly inspirational.
Similarly, I’m much more selective about how I spend my time but learning things doesn’t seem especially harder.
Some things take more decades of prerequisites than others.
Those are the things you can't even learn effectively until you get quite a bit older.
Those are the things you can't even learn effectively until you get quite a bit older.
One of the most important things I learned early in life - don't define yourself based on your career. Eventually, the career ends and then you find that you don't know who "you" are. Same with family, children, friends, etc. They are all important as is one's career. But at the end of the day, if you lose sight of "you" or only define yourself in terms of career or those around you, you are going to be a miserable, old retiree. This attitude probably cost me a promotion or two along the way but that was a fair trade off. I never lost sight of "me".
Of course you're not going to be as quick as you were at 20 for the rest of your life, but you will get wiser. [Edit: Or maybe just more opinionated? I think I was pretty opinionated when I was young, though]
As you get older, you learn metapatterns about the world. You see the things you thought were unique new wisdom, were actually just a fashion. So you get more selective about where you apply the limited resources you've got.
If you've seen the hype cycle play out in your life once, you're going to be slower to invest in the next wave. That's natural. I've seen the idea of making things portable by implementing things in a Virtual Machine play out more than once in my life... the UCSD Pascal P Machine, then Java, and Flash, and now WASM.
However, I've also learned why each failed, so I still have a strong interest in WASM, despite it seeming to be the latest in a pattern. It's because of the unique nature of its security guarantees that I hold out hope for it. Like I said, you get more selective, not just stubborn.
I'm 58, and grumpy as heck about some things, and experimenting in direct manipulation of Abstract Syntax Trees for fun as a diversion for now. Once I get my new glasses, and can get about the world again, it's back to learning C and working on MSTOICAL a typed forth variant.
As you get older, you learn metapatterns about the world. You see the things you thought were unique new wisdom, were actually just a fashion. So you get more selective about where you apply the limited resources you've got.
If you've seen the hype cycle play out in your life once, you're going to be slower to invest in the next wave. That's natural. I've seen the idea of making things portable by implementing things in a Virtual Machine play out more than once in my life... the UCSD Pascal P Machine, then Java, and Flash, and now WASM.
However, I've also learned why each failed, so I still have a strong interest in WASM, despite it seeming to be the latest in a pattern. It's because of the unique nature of its security guarantees that I hold out hope for it. Like I said, you get more selective, not just stubborn.
I'm 58, and grumpy as heck about some things, and experimenting in direct manipulation of Abstract Syntax Trees for fun as a diversion for now. Once I get my new glasses, and can get about the world again, it's back to learning C and working on MSTOICAL a typed forth variant.
I'm 55, I have no problem learning something new if I am interested in it, and I think that is the key.
Some people just seem to lose interest in new things as they get older, sometimes as young as 40, I have seen. Once you lose interest in new things it's very hard to learn new things.
For some people it seems there is a certain comfort and security in only doing things you know, for others it is the opposite - same same is boring and new things are interesting.
I see collegues, some more than a decade younger than me, setting in their ways, and the biggest predictor I notice is music tastes. Once they start closing off and lacking interest in any new music, that's the beginning of the stopping of growing (and starting of dying) in general. Make a point to listen to new music.
Also, children keep you young, if you have them take some time to listen to their music and talk to them about the trends in their world and keep familiar with their jargon. That will also stop you getting old before your time.
Some people just seem to lose interest in new things as they get older, sometimes as young as 40, I have seen. Once you lose interest in new things it's very hard to learn new things.
For some people it seems there is a certain comfort and security in only doing things you know, for others it is the opposite - same same is boring and new things are interesting.
I see collegues, some more than a decade younger than me, setting in their ways, and the biggest predictor I notice is music tastes. Once they start closing off and lacking interest in any new music, that's the beginning of the stopping of growing (and starting of dying) in general. Make a point to listen to new music.
Also, children keep you young, if you have them take some time to listen to their music and talk to them about the trends in their world and keep familiar with their jargon. That will also stop you getting old before your time.
Surely you speak figuratively for developing taste and hunger for the latest and greatest has no correlation with lifespan. For I have seen people with boring mundane lives following the same daily routine for decades, yet living well into their nineties.
I agree, maybe it's more if it aligns with your own sense of self to be an adventurer or routinist.
But I have always felt the day you stop growing at all must the day you start shrinking.
The Japanese have a saying about it, "reason for getting out of bed in the morning", maybe for some people that reason is to complete their routine, for others to discover something new.
But I have always felt the day you stop growing at all must the day you start shrinking.
The Japanese have a saying about it, "reason for getting out of bed in the morning", maybe for some people that reason is to complete their routine, for others to discover something new.
Biologically, maybe, but only a little and it won't explain the feeling that it's a lot. I don't think it has much to do with any age related cognitive decline and mostly to do with more responsibilities, more things competing for your time and an objectivity that causes you to have different priorities.
As I've gotten older I've only had more and more things competing for my time. I have a family, a home, hobbies, etc. I just can't devote hours and hours of uninterrupted time. With experience there's a lot of "ain't gunna need it" and if I do I'll learn it then. I've got plenty of stuff that I sank tons of time into in my younger years that only faded into memories and didn't turn out to be very useful.
As far as tech goes you'll see enough stuff come and go that sinking that much time into it will feel like a waste. Remember SOAP, SOA, XML, XSLT, EJB, CORBA, MapReduce, Mesos, Java Applets, etc? A lot of what you're doing now is going on that list.
As I've gotten older I've only had more and more things competing for my time. I have a family, a home, hobbies, etc. I just can't devote hours and hours of uninterrupted time. With experience there's a lot of "ain't gunna need it" and if I do I'll learn it then. I've got plenty of stuff that I sank tons of time into in my younger years that only faded into memories and didn't turn out to be very useful.
As far as tech goes you'll see enough stuff come and go that sinking that much time into it will feel like a waste. Remember SOAP, SOA, XML, XSLT, EJB, CORBA, MapReduce, Mesos, Java Applets, etc? A lot of what you're doing now is going on that list.
Remember why it was that it was easier to learn new things when you were younger, yes there is a certain biology for it. (Side note: I'm pretty sure I heard Andrew Huberman talk about this and he recommended Choline as a supplement to help get your levels to similar to someone younger, no idea how correct this is, i've made a note to read more into it myself)
But I would say, it is that sense of wonder and imagination that you lose when you are older, you've seen stuff, even interesting stuff becomes 'oh just another interesting thing, much like this other thing i saw before'.
What you need to do is optimise things for novelty, interest, excitement and challenge rather than for outcome. As you get older, you likely have things you want, these will become goals, but these will be based on what you already know and your supposed path to them will also be best on your current knowledge. The problem is, that won't even get you to anywhere interesting, it might not even get you to that 'goal' because the world is way more complex than you think and you begin to think you know as you get set in your ways.
When you did interesting things, when you learned the most, it was when you didn't know any better, you didn't know what you were doing, you need to get rid of that idea that you know, you need to accept you don't get out of your comfort zone and do things, try things, optimise for that novelty rather than an outcome and you might find something interesting and that is where you will learn the most.
If you really want to learn, change your goal from achieving things and outcomes, to seeking out novelty, things that interesting/excite you and anything that is a little bit challenging for you. It will put you back in that space again, or at least as much as you can be.
I found this talk interesting on this subject: It talks about lessons learned from AI and machine learning that show this to be a valid path. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXQPL9GooyI&t=1s
But I would say, it is that sense of wonder and imagination that you lose when you are older, you've seen stuff, even interesting stuff becomes 'oh just another interesting thing, much like this other thing i saw before'.
What you need to do is optimise things for novelty, interest, excitement and challenge rather than for outcome. As you get older, you likely have things you want, these will become goals, but these will be based on what you already know and your supposed path to them will also be best on your current knowledge. The problem is, that won't even get you to anywhere interesting, it might not even get you to that 'goal' because the world is way more complex than you think and you begin to think you know as you get set in your ways.
When you did interesting things, when you learned the most, it was when you didn't know any better, you didn't know what you were doing, you need to get rid of that idea that you know, you need to accept you don't get out of your comfort zone and do things, try things, optimise for that novelty rather than an outcome and you might find something interesting and that is where you will learn the most.
If you really want to learn, change your goal from achieving things and outcomes, to seeking out novelty, things that interesting/excite you and anything that is a little bit challenging for you. It will put you back in that space again, or at least as much as you can be.
I found this talk interesting on this subject: It talks about lessons learned from AI and machine learning that show this to be a valid path. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXQPL9GooyI&t=1s
Imagine someone spending 40 hours a week training to be fit. They might be 18, 30 or 40 years old.
Now another person only has 4 hours a week.
Who is going to be fitter? Who is going to find it easier to, for example, take up a new sport, like rowing for example.
Now replace fitness with learning.
And note that 18-21 year olds at university are learning 40+ hours a week.
And typically by 30 you are working and applying 40+ hours a week, but hard studying much fewer hours. (Unless actively studying, say for a leet code type interview or something).
Now another person only has 4 hours a week.
Who is going to be fitter? Who is going to find it easier to, for example, take up a new sport, like rowing for example.
Now replace fitness with learning.
And note that 18-21 year olds at university are learning 40+ hours a week.
And typically by 30 you are working and applying 40+ hours a week, but hard studying much fewer hours. (Unless actively studying, say for a leet code type interview or something).
More prosaically: Having kids makes learning many things difficult from a time perspective — and they tend to show up exactly when people imagine they are suffering from age related declines.
On a positive note, they do give you other perspectives. So it’s not all bad.
On a positive note, they do give you other perspectives. So it’s not all bad.
Yes, it is more difficult. Just observe children, it's delusional to deny it.
The biological decay is obvious - for now - but the mental factor is way underrated. Mature people often don't have the time or the mental space to dive into something and "forget the world" like youngsters have. Almost without exception mature people prioritize their family or at least they are accountable for it. They may find time after retirement but then the biological decay will be more advanced.
During college (Architecture, a field dependent on creativity) I remember hard-working colleagues in their 40s and 50s, people with jobs, sometimes family and they couldn't pass the same bar as the youngsters. While youngsters could spend days debating some theory and shaking it till the foundations, older people barely had the time and mental space to execute. I heard literally teachers saying that they had to lower the bar for them or they would be there indefinitely without major improvements.
The biological decay is obvious - for now - but the mental factor is way underrated. Mature people often don't have the time or the mental space to dive into something and "forget the world" like youngsters have. Almost without exception mature people prioritize their family or at least they are accountable for it. They may find time after retirement but then the biological decay will be more advanced.
During college (Architecture, a field dependent on creativity) I remember hard-working colleagues in their 40s and 50s, people with jobs, sometimes family and they couldn't pass the same bar as the youngsters. While youngsters could spend days debating some theory and shaking it till the foundations, older people barely had the time and mental space to execute. I heard literally teachers saying that they had to lower the bar for them or they would be there indefinitely without major improvements.
From 30-47 I have only found it easier to learn new skills. I’m 47 now and even in the last 10 years, I learned a lot. Like, how to build a full stack web app which I’ve used with our customers for a few years, to deliver millions per year in sales. I became an expert on at least a dozen programming tech acronyms to get that done. Also, I learned 2D/3D mechanical CAD design, I learned circuit design and PCB layout (fusion 360/solid works/eagle, etc), and I became fairly fluent in Mandarin including some literacy with hundreds of characters. I was naturally interested in those areas because it helped my business and directly improved my life to learn them, but I still had to force myself to continue and I think everyone does at some point. Of course, this is all anecdotal, but I don’t expect age related decline should be happening for most people at age 30 unless there’s some underlying physical health issues.
How many do you juggle at once? I’m learning Japanese, but I find it eats up a lot of my webdev, fitness, and reading time.
For me it’s quite the opposite. I learn things faster now, but I can’t find the time or motivation. There are many things that seem very cool to learn but when I ask myself why, there’s no convincing answer, so it will be just time wasted.
Also I have two children, so I have to be very selective on how I spend my time.
Also I have two children, so I have to be very selective on how I spend my time.
Your interests change over time, which can dramatically impact what you learn. It thought from 20-30 I'd be focused on tech forever, but now I'm 40 I gravitate towards the nuance of conversation. I suspect further changes and by the time I'm 70 I won't shut up about grandfather clocks from the 18th century.
So it goes.
So it goes.
What about the nuance of conversation interests? Semantics and semiotics or more the psychology behind it?
The psychology behind it. "Crucial Conversations" was the book that really kicked me off. It demonstrated how people can hear something different to what you say, and how you can create a conversational environment more conducive to the conversation you're trying to have.
More recently, conversational techniques for problem solving have been really interesting. Google "The SOON Funnel" if you're curious.
More recently, conversational techniques for problem solving have been really interesting. Google "The SOON Funnel" if you're curious.
I was better at unpracticed memorization and recall when I was younger. Some decades later, I feel worse at that but better at identifying implicit patterns and synthesizing novel insight across domains.
So no, I wouldn’t say I’ve found learning more difficult. I just recognize there are different things to learn.
My suggestion would be to reassess what you think “learning” means, because you’re probably already doing a better job of it than you’re giving yourself credit for.
It sounds like you want to learn explicit material like a student might. That’s fine, but at some point I would imagine your head will get a bit overcrowded with disjoint, received details. If you’ve emphasized that sort of learning in the past, you might just be sort of topped up and need to change gears to a more sophisticated kind of learning.
So no, I wouldn’t say I’ve found learning more difficult. I just recognize there are different things to learn.
My suggestion would be to reassess what you think “learning” means, because you’re probably already doing a better job of it than you’re giving yourself credit for.
It sounds like you want to learn explicit material like a student might. That’s fine, but at some point I would imagine your head will get a bit overcrowded with disjoint, received details. If you’ve emphasized that sort of learning in the past, you might just be sort of topped up and need to change gears to a more sophisticated kind of learning.
I'm 40. I'm not sure if I have to try harder to learn. I was never bright in the first place.
I'm way more motivated to learn now. I only really watch Netflix etc on Friday and Saturday nights. Other evenings I try to get an hour to myself to do self learning. (Difficult with a child,!)
My main problem is I prefer learning programming related things not directly related to my programming job. Currently doing a course on network programming in c (I don't have a com sci degree).
What I really want is to learn maths to the point we're I can do a bit of calculus.
Just listened to John carmack on lex Fridman podcast. Very inspiring. He's switched in to AI research , never seems to stop teaching himself. (Though he has the advantage of being genius).
I'm way more motivated to learn now. I only really watch Netflix etc on Friday and Saturday nights. Other evenings I try to get an hour to myself to do self learning. (Difficult with a child,!)
My main problem is I prefer learning programming related things not directly related to my programming job. Currently doing a course on network programming in c (I don't have a com sci degree).
What I really want is to learn maths to the point we're I can do a bit of calculus.
Just listened to John carmack on lex Fridman podcast. Very inspiring. He's switched in to AI research , never seems to stop teaching himself. (Though he has the advantage of being genius).
Yes, but he's a genius who works his ass off. Come to think of it, I don't know of many lazy geniuses. Chas Chandler said Hendrix always had a guitar strapped on him.
Yes and no, depending on what you are learning.
I'm 50, and finding it easier than ever to learn. (Mostly.) For most new topics, and in particular new tech skills, there is some similarity to something I've learned before. I just need to adapt my perspective and learn some new details.
Sometimes I end up wanting to learn something truly new that does not match any prior knowledge. That can be hard. And I can sometimes feel like I don't want to bother. But such a scenario is the exception.
I'm 50, and finding it easier than ever to learn. (Mostly.) For most new topics, and in particular new tech skills, there is some similarity to something I've learned before. I just need to adapt my perspective and learn some new details.
Sometimes I end up wanting to learn something truly new that does not match any prior knowledge. That can be hard. And I can sometimes feel like I don't want to bother. But such a scenario is the exception.
It's interesting how what we believe about our brains can actually influence how we end up using them. I subscribe to the neuroplasticity theory -- that your brain adapts to whatever you're doing the most. So some pathways become super-familiar (and harder to break out of) -- but you can start a new pattern with consistency. (One way people do this is with a carefully-chosen new routine.)
As far as aging goes, its impacts are more diverse than I thought, according to a really interesting book called "The Secret Life of the Grown-Up Brain: The Surprising Talents of the Middle-Aged Mind." Aging brains really haven't been studied until recently, and newer research (cited in the book) suggests that in some ways the brain improves at certain kinds of thinking during aging. (A rough model is that you spend your youth acquiring a raw mass of experience, and as you age it gets consolidated into actionable chunks.) So while you may have trouble recalling specific facts, aging brains also out-perform when it comes to synthesizing existing information and extrapolating solutions.
That's just one example from the book. Basically, aging brains are a lot more interesting than we give them credit for.
As far as aging goes, its impacts are more diverse than I thought, according to a really interesting book called "The Secret Life of the Grown-Up Brain: The Surprising Talents of the Middle-Aged Mind." Aging brains really haven't been studied until recently, and newer research (cited in the book) suggests that in some ways the brain improves at certain kinds of thinking during aging. (A rough model is that you spend your youth acquiring a raw mass of experience, and as you age it gets consolidated into actionable chunks.) So while you may have trouble recalling specific facts, aging brains also out-perform when it comes to synthesizing existing information and extrapolating solutions.
That's just one example from the book. Basically, aging brains are a lot more interesting than we give them credit for.
You didn't share how old you are, but I'm almost 30 and felt like before while working a highly demanding job my memory and mind was slightly affected. Just from sustained pressure over time.
Almost 1.5 years after quitting my mind feels just like it did when I was 20. Only difference is now just a different personality from being older I'd say. I'll be soon beginning a new job though so wish me luck!
Almost 1.5 years after quitting my mind feels just like it did when I was 20. Only difference is now just a different personality from being older I'd say. I'll be soon beginning a new job though so wish me luck!
[deleted]
I'm 30 as well. But I feel the opposite. I have much more context about what I'm learning and generally know related things as well. I feel because of this I can learn things much more quickly then when I was 20. Maybe if I need to learn something completely outside of my knowledge sphere I would struggle more then before. But I have no reason to believe that.
40. Yeah gonna be more difficult when you have kids. I guess one trick is to limit what I'm learning e.g. never learn two things simultaneously. Another thing not to overlook is the decay time of one learning session: I have to keep the sessions close enough so that I don't lose everything I learned from the previous one.
I'm 25 so take that in consideration, but even at my age if I don't sleep well and I don't eat well, I won't have as much will to learn new things.
I believe exercising, eating well, good sleep, keeping stress low will make wonders with wanting to learn new things.
I believe exercising, eating well, good sleep, keeping stress low will make wonders with wanting to learn new things.
No. If anything, I find it to be much easier to learn anything that extends what I already know, and being older you (hopefully) just know more. You have a much more solid base to build upon quickly and easily.
I find I just learn differently than when I was younger. At college I could just sit there listen to the teacher and absorb everything. It made doing tests which just require knowing stuff without needing to apply that knowledge easy.
These days I'd fail miserably at that but now I can read something and figure out how to apply that knowledge to something pretty easily. Which I think is the better option.
Try changing how you try learning new things, if you used to read things try videos or working through examples.
These days I'd fail miserably at that but now I can read something and figure out how to apply that knowledge to something pretty easily. Which I think is the better option.
Try changing how you try learning new things, if you used to read things try videos or working through examples.
I believe that we learn by applying and adapting the models implicit in things we already know to new situations. The older we get the more models we have for forming the foundations for new ideas. Beginning a new learning project might benefit from asking ourselves what is this like, how is it similar, and how is it different. Keeping this model in the back of our minds as we learn may help.
Let me answer with a passage from the biography of Federico Fellini ("Federico") written by Tullio Kezich, which has become a ray of light for me.
"He [Fellini] lived inside things with indomitable curiosity and perpetual openness, surrendering himself to what Dostoevsky calls "the river of life," in the serene understanding that it always takes you somewhere."
"He [Fellini] lived inside things with indomitable curiosity and perpetual openness, surrendering himself to what Dostoevsky calls "the river of life," in the serene understanding that it always takes you somewhere."
When I was in my 20s, I would learn something about everything. Now at 30 I can learn everything about something.
I think the easiest way to learn new things are two simple steps:
1. Always be reading. 2. Teach yourself how to learn
There’s many great books on the latter topic. Once you get the basics and understand the different modes of your brain and the importance of rest, anything is possible.
I think the easiest way to learn new things are two simple steps:
1. Always be reading. 2. Teach yourself how to learn
There’s many great books on the latter topic. Once you get the basics and understand the different modes of your brain and the importance of rest, anything is possible.
which books you could recommend?
Barbara Oakley published a couple earlier this year or last year. She covers it all in my opinion. There’s also one called “Make it stick” which is okay.
https://barbaraoakley.com/books/
https://barbaraoakley.com/books/
It’s about wanting to do something and having energy to do it. When I’m fresh and interested I still learn fast. I guess I was fresh and interested more often when I was younger. Also, learning was a priority back then, not so much these days.
Why do you want to force yourself? Do you have something to prove? Just enjoy life.
Why do you want to force yourself? Do you have something to prove? Just enjoy life.
Similar age here. It was so easy to learn when I was younger. Now I'm slow. Part of it might be that I see much of the newer tech knowledge as being throwaway. Why learn it when I'll have to learn the same sort of stuff next year for the new tech stack or language?
I think the actual process of learning doesn't become that much harder. But what happens to many of us is that when external pressure to learn stops (when we graduate), there just isn't enough internal motivation to keep the fire burning, at least as brightly.
I have found that with age it became easier to learn and just as easier to forget details of what you have learned.
It's not that it's harder, exactly. It's that your priorities shift quite a lot as you move along. Technical mastery in the sense of "look at this extremely complicated, high effort piece" tends to be the provenance of young people. Young people need to prove themselves and work the chip off their shoulder. They want to keep up with the new, and so they'll try to master whatever looks like the new thing.
But then you get to a place where you've done some of that keeping up, and most of the time, it's not going to consume you for the rest of your life. A new thing eventually becomes old, and while learning another new thing can set up a career, you hesitate a little more to bother when you already have things you want to go deeper on. Which means the kind of learning you do is different, less focused on the grind of established courses and more in the space of independent study, integrating a bunch of disparate things into a whole. It shows up in people's brains, too: the current thought is that "crystallized" intelligence peaks much later in life. Young people are fast, old people are wise.
I realize now that something I really didn't understand, even as I started my 30's, was how to study things really well. I could be a fan about them, and learn interesting facts, and follow steps, but the really essential thing was to not gloss over it, and to turn the learning into a workout, a thing that engages you while simultaneously being relatively simple and monotonous, just copying things, memorizing things, repeating processes to master them. And part of your repulsion may well be the same kind of feeling that many get at the idea of "working out" - your brain knows that's what needs to be done, your emotions say, why do that, it's so much effort. As a baby it's no issue, you'll do anything if pointed the right direction, and just expend all the energy you have on hand and then sleep it off. But somewhere along the way you both gain desire to save energy, and also to protect an identity of being "the kind of person who...", and other various beliefs. You can't just turn on baby mode and follow along with the nursery rhymes or practice tracing the alphabet. No, you have to say to yourself, "I'm going to turn this into reps and do 30 reps today." It takes some creativity even to start down that path because often the material you want to study is all packaged up in a form that doesn't aid your mastery.
But it's hardly as simple as old people suddenly becoming unable to operate a computer. The old can still discuss technical matters, but they aren't self-evidently interesting to know or discuss. Most of them are things to eliminate from life in order to make room for something else.
But then you get to a place where you've done some of that keeping up, and most of the time, it's not going to consume you for the rest of your life. A new thing eventually becomes old, and while learning another new thing can set up a career, you hesitate a little more to bother when you already have things you want to go deeper on. Which means the kind of learning you do is different, less focused on the grind of established courses and more in the space of independent study, integrating a bunch of disparate things into a whole. It shows up in people's brains, too: the current thought is that "crystallized" intelligence peaks much later in life. Young people are fast, old people are wise.
I realize now that something I really didn't understand, even as I started my 30's, was how to study things really well. I could be a fan about them, and learn interesting facts, and follow steps, but the really essential thing was to not gloss over it, and to turn the learning into a workout, a thing that engages you while simultaneously being relatively simple and monotonous, just copying things, memorizing things, repeating processes to master them. And part of your repulsion may well be the same kind of feeling that many get at the idea of "working out" - your brain knows that's what needs to be done, your emotions say, why do that, it's so much effort. As a baby it's no issue, you'll do anything if pointed the right direction, and just expend all the energy you have on hand and then sleep it off. But somewhere along the way you both gain desire to save energy, and also to protect an identity of being "the kind of person who...", and other various beliefs. You can't just turn on baby mode and follow along with the nursery rhymes or practice tracing the alphabet. No, you have to say to yourself, "I'm going to turn this into reps and do 30 reps today." It takes some creativity even to start down that path because often the material you want to study is all packaged up in a form that doesn't aid your mastery.
But it's hardly as simple as old people suddenly becoming unable to operate a computer. The old can still discuss technical matters, but they aren't self-evidently interesting to know or discuss. Most of them are things to eliminate from life in order to make room for something else.
There is a physiological change that occurs in the brain as you age. It is more difficult to learn as you get older.
Lots of people never stop learning until they die. It's just not as easy. Some people do better than others.
30 is not that age.
You ever consider you may be burnt out?
Lots of people never stop learning until they die. It's just not as easy. Some people do better than others.
30 is not that age.
You ever consider you may be burnt out?
would you mind explaining that a little more please.
my understanding is that 'slowdown' only has to do with the ease of using existing 'understandings' rather than an inherent ability to 'learn' (new organisations that work). I'm way past 30, the biggest barrier I find is letting go of things that were 'easy' and reorganising understanding in new ways.
Pick things you’re passionate about.
Edit: I’m 30