GitHub's Legacy of Terrible Code Review(tylercipriani.com)
tylercipriani.com
GitHub's Legacy of Terrible Code Review
https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2024/08/31/the-pull-request/
2 comments
[deleted]
https://tylercipriani.com/blog/2024/08/31/the-pull-request/
I will never understand why GitHub has not invested as much in code review as they have in the rest of their platform. For their paying customers it has to be the number one part of their platform in terms of time-on-page.
But one thing they did well was open basically every part of the review experience to GitHub apps via their APIs. So tools like CodeApprove, Reviewable, Graphite, GitContext, etc can build better experiences over the top and give GitHub users more choice.
I still don't know why most programmers just accept the default here. GitHub made an IDE (Atom) but we don't all just use it because they said so. Why do most of us use their code review UI just because it's there?