I have build model of only 1700 lines of code based on my brain theory(github.com)
github.com
I have build model of only 1700 lines of code based on my brain theory
https://github.com/vincent2o1/CRX-Lite
5 comments
I think you're making progress, I would keep going as continuously as possible even if you can't build a very big team so soon.
Even if it takes a lot more calendar time than you would like, it could be more impressive with only a few thousand lines, which could still be taken in stride single-handedly. Perhaps for an even firmer foundation. Strive to maintain readiness for a situation where an initial team-mate could virtually double progress, even if it doesn't relieve you of any challenges at all.
Unfortunatley I'm not hardly prepared to contribute anything really useful at this point that could speed up progress, but if I did I would give it a try.
I will be keeping an eye on you and hoping momentum builds, I hope others will too, just don't quit building yourself !
Even if it takes a lot more calendar time than you would like, it could be more impressive with only a few thousand lines, which could still be taken in stride single-handedly. Perhaps for an even firmer foundation. Strive to maintain readiness for a situation where an initial team-mate could virtually double progress, even if it doesn't relieve you of any challenges at all.
Unfortunatley I'm not hardly prepared to contribute anything really useful at this point that could speed up progress, but if I did I would give it a try.
I will be keeping an eye on you and hoping momentum builds, I hope others will too, just don't quit building yourself !
Thank you very much for your reply man.. really appreciate it.. i have a request! what would you like to see from my side? I will try to build it if i can.. i just want to know where to start for the next phase in building this model..
I thought of creating videos on how this model may work, but i think thats again may not increase progress..
I'm not up-to-date at all, and never was that advanced to be able to judge.
There are so many real experts, and they're getting better all the time, I would like to see what some of them would want that would arouse their attention.
I do get the idea that you are outside the mainstream, but it sounds so realistic. I took action along these lines a little in 1980 for a couple years before that employer bit the dust with the recession that was imposed at the time back then. All the coding was still not really wasted, even though it was way outside my core responsibilities ever since. This was before PC's, I was already maxing out everything on the hardware anyway. But I'll always regret not being able to continue at the time. Running the code did help us earn income, so it was already paying for itself, but the rest of the company was not exactly profitable after such a downturn. By the late '90's I had reached stability with my own company, and started again in Windows 95 but that hard drive crashed, I'll always regret that too :( even though it was much less than two years' work. But I did continue my primary automation project by itself, which performed in excess of design criteria, alone leveraging my small business quite well beyond what artificially enhanced intelligence could ever be expected to add. Even though I've always known how it could add a good bit, without doubt. Never did try real ML again, since then mostly just logic to get more out of the low-hanging automation fruit. But bigger companies, woo hoo they could use a little more intelligence and it could add up to a lot of dollars at that scale, as long as it never fails an intelligence test with flying colors ;)
Maybe a dramatic demo of pattern recognition and interpretation which maximizes the capabilities of limited hardware is within reach, which could spark peoples' imagination about how much more impressive it would be with only "nominal" hardware.
Maximize the effect of intelligent potential by avoiding the complexities of accommodating language or even visual frameworks.
It may be even more difficult to make an engaging demo that way though, perhaps it's too early for much of a video demo until you just can't stop yourself :) A more widely accessible PC demo might be a good milestone, I'm not even qualified to run what you have here. Either way you are allowed to give an impression of what you know it can be like in the future, even if you are not there yet.
I think you are going to be good at that, your vision for the future seems to be on an enlightening path, that much I can determine already without any understanding of your code so far.
There are so many real experts, and they're getting better all the time, I would like to see what some of them would want that would arouse their attention.
I do get the idea that you are outside the mainstream, but it sounds so realistic. I took action along these lines a little in 1980 for a couple years before that employer bit the dust with the recession that was imposed at the time back then. All the coding was still not really wasted, even though it was way outside my core responsibilities ever since. This was before PC's, I was already maxing out everything on the hardware anyway. But I'll always regret not being able to continue at the time. Running the code did help us earn income, so it was already paying for itself, but the rest of the company was not exactly profitable after such a downturn. By the late '90's I had reached stability with my own company, and started again in Windows 95 but that hard drive crashed, I'll always regret that too :( even though it was much less than two years' work. But I did continue my primary automation project by itself, which performed in excess of design criteria, alone leveraging my small business quite well beyond what artificially enhanced intelligence could ever be expected to add. Even though I've always known how it could add a good bit, without doubt. Never did try real ML again, since then mostly just logic to get more out of the low-hanging automation fruit. But bigger companies, woo hoo they could use a little more intelligence and it could add up to a lot of dollars at that scale, as long as it never fails an intelligence test with flying colors ;)
Maybe a dramatic demo of pattern recognition and interpretation which maximizes the capabilities of limited hardware is within reach, which could spark peoples' imagination about how much more impressive it would be with only "nominal" hardware.
Maximize the effect of intelligent potential by avoiding the complexities of accommodating language or even visual frameworks.
It may be even more difficult to make an engaging demo that way though, perhaps it's too early for much of a video demo until you just can't stop yourself :) A more widely accessible PC demo might be a good milestone, I'm not even qualified to run what you have here. Either way you are allowed to give an impression of what you know it can be like in the future, even if you are not there yet.
I think you are going to be good at that, your vision for the future seems to be on an enlightening path, that much I can determine already without any understanding of your code so far.
thank you very much for your words and advice.. i really consider your advice.. let's see how it goes..
We have built calculators, not robot hands, to do calculations. Do not ignore this just because it seems simple; I have iterated many times on this idea to get to this point. I can say that, though it may seem simple, there is a lot of explanation for why it is simple and why it should be.
im looking for a team, do join if you find this interesting.. please let me know what you think about this model in the comment section