CUDA version of GROMACS is faster on AMD than HIP port(scale-lang.com)
scale-lang.com
CUDA version of GROMACS is faster on AMD than HIP port
https://scale-lang.com/posts/2025-05-19-GROMACS
3 comments
Absolutely agree.
We're big fans of SCALE at https://stratoflow.com, as it's a natural enabler for AMD hardware to break into more serious AI and machine learning (remember that term?) workloads.
And honestly, I still can't understand why they haven't been acquired by AMD yet.
We're big fans of SCALE at https://stratoflow.com, as it's a natural enabler for AMD hardware to break into more serious AI and machine learning (remember that term?) workloads.
And honestly, I still can't understand why they haven't been acquired by AMD yet.
Hey there!
Would love to connect and hear more about what you like about SCALE and where you'd like it to go.
AMD is a part of our strategy, but it's not the end-game - we envision SCALE to be vendor neutral and have plans to support all of the competitive GPUs that come out in the future, including AMD, NVIDIA, Intel and any newcomers.
Would love to connect and hear more about what you like about SCALE and where you'd like it to go.
AMD is a part of our strategy, but it's not the end-game - we envision SCALE to be vendor neutral and have plans to support all of the competitive GPUs that come out in the future, including AMD, NVIDIA, Intel and any newcomers.
SCALE as a solution to enable developers to write code once for CUDA, and run anywhere (AMD is the first target), is very bullish for AMD. We have been watching their progress over the past year and things are improving at a steady pace.