This is not what the court said, the court ruled 2 to 1, that the food/calorie intake should be monitored, not that it is below what was defined.
It says nothing against the change of menu for the prisoners accused of terrorism after the Oct 7 nor that it's not ok for it to be different from the criminal prisoners menu.
It says nothing against the change of menu for the prisoners accused of terrorism after the Oct 7 nor that it's not ok for it to be different from the criminal prisoners menu.
But that won't get the guardian views..