[untitled]
6 comments
How does it compare to https://github.com/qodo-ai/pr-agent/ ?
Docs are not at all clear about the feature-set/checks.
Docs are not at all clear about the feature-set/checks.
The README is obviously AI-generated, complete with fake testimonials. The whole project is surely just slop. I would not touch this with a 50-foot pole.
This project has a grand total of two commits, one with the entire codebase and one edit of the README.
The user behind the commit joined github in 2024 and seems to have only contributed to "awesome lists" so far.
Is there some kind of story/community/anything behind this project that would help me to trust running it?
The user behind the commit joined github in 2024 and seems to have only contributed to "awesome lists" so far.
Is there some kind of story/community/anything behind this project that would help me to trust running it?
prompt: https://github.com/furudo-erika/codingfox/blob/main/src/prom...
( imho: early projects like this can still offer useful ideas. Constructive feedback helps them grow. )
( imho: early projects like this can still offer useful ideas. Constructive feedback helps them grow. )
You know it's an AI generated readme when the "advanced language models" it mentions are GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4
And the success stories are just something else. "It pays for itself" - Engineering Manager.
Sure, Engineering Manager, sure.
We're about to see a steep rise in AI code slop on GitHub as everyone tries to pad their resumes with "open source contributions".
And the success stories are just something else. "It pays for itself" - Engineering Manager.
Sure, Engineering Manager, sure.
We're about to see a steep rise in AI code slop on GitHub as everyone tries to pad their resumes with "open source contributions".
Launching with this in the introductory sentence of a code-review tool .. is.. yep.
Luckily an easy fix, but if the product can be enhanced to detect outdated docs in the rest of the repo.. that’s an exciting feature!