Somebody is to Blame for This(codinghorror.com)
codinghorror.com
Somebody is to Blame for This
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/09/somebody-is-to-blame-for-this.html
19 comments
I bumped up my life cover yesterday by a factor of 4. That's the lesson for startups here.
Year 1-3 means that you are losing everything. If you die during that time, you better leave your loved ones with something to take home for your obsession with windmills.
Year 1-3 means that you are losing everything. If you die during that time, you better leave your loved ones with something to take home for your obsession with windmills.
> Why a family decided to take their tragedy to a courtroom to force it upon others makes me upset though.
maybe sth to do with this http://hackerne.ws/item?id=4558309
maybe sth to do with this http://hackerne.ws/item?id=4558309
It is likely the family had little choice in the matter. Death is expensive in the United States (and other countries, I'm sure), so sometimes the only way to avoid having your loss compounded with complete bankruptcy is to go to court and find someone to blame.
Or settle out of court before it ever reaches trial. Trial means they were offered settlements and rejected them.
Whew, heartbreaking.
But like that great Indian liberator once quipped: "Life is dhukka". Let us liberate ourselves from the clinginess of existence.
I am not one to advocate open and public emotional outpourings, although I contradict this view when I write poems which I then send to my closest friends ... I'm ok with this contradiction, I'm not neurotic. ;-) However, one can see why it is totally legitimate for Anthony Griffith to do so. He is in his own words a clown. And his entire point was that a clown can sometimes ... should sometimes ... make you cry.
I tip my hat to this brave man. I would have a beer with this man any time!
But like that great Indian liberator once quipped: "Life is dhukka". Let us liberate ourselves from the clinginess of existence.
I am not one to advocate open and public emotional outpourings, although I contradict this view when I write poems which I then send to my closest friends ... I'm ok with this contradiction, I'm not neurotic. ;-) However, one can see why it is totally legitimate for Anthony Griffith to do so. He is in his own words a clown. And his entire point was that a clown can sometimes ... should sometimes ... make you cry.
I tip my hat to this brave man. I would have a beer with this man any time!
How can you tell that story and not conclude with the result of the trial?
It's so well written, despite all the terror of the words, you can still almost imagine Jeff as one of 12, arguing against 'verdict for the plaintiff'.
It's so well written, despite all the terror of the words, you can still almost imagine Jeff as one of 12, arguing against 'verdict for the plaintiff'.
Because it wasn't the point of the story, even though everybody was expecting it. I imagine Jeff left it out to focus on the message he's trying to send.
"The unbearable grief demands that someone must be to blame for this unimaginably terrible thing that is happening to you, this deeply, profoundly unfair tragedy. But there's nobody"
This might be a hint?
This might be a hint?
Now I urgently want this trial to be over.
> This trial was the story [...]
It probably is. Also, aren't you legally prohibited to talk about the trial while it is on?
It probably is. Also, aren't you legally prohibited to talk about the trial while it is on?
> Five weeks ago, I was selected for jury
> duty in a medical malpractice trial.
> I heard plenty of people get selected and
> make up some bogus story about how they couldn't
> possibly be fair and impartial to get out of
> this five week obligation.
People buy into the idea that the world is just, that everything happens for a reason (just-world fallacy). But sometimes bad things happen, for no reason, sometimes asshats win.
I watched the Anthony Griffiths movie he referred to a while ago and it is heartbreaking. I'm normally a very reserved person who's partner is convinced my tear ducts dried up from lack of use years ago, but watching Anthony tell his story is like a punch in the guts. I didn't enjoy watching it, but I'm glad I did. It sure puts things in perspective.
Please consider yourself lucky you experienced this through a film. Last week I got to experience it in front of my eyes and afterwards again when telling my 6 y/old little girl her grandmother died. Your own grief is hard, your kid's grief is unbearable.
The linked video of Anthony Griffith talking about his daughter dying of cancer whilst trying to support his family through the business of making people laugh is quite possibly the most heart wrenching thing I have ever seen in my life.
It reminds of the clown. That disturbing painted fake smile. No wonder they still freak me out.
It reminds of the clown. That disturbing painted fake smile. No wonder they still freak me out.
My 7 days of sequestration with 11 other people and a bailiff arguing a difficult case were the worst 7 days of my life, and my case wasn't as heart wrenching as Jeff's. First world problem, but it's not an experience I would wish on any one.
I was just stunned by the first comment by Matt
"Only thing I can write is "I should have heeded to your warning"".
How can someone have such bad taste.
"Only thing I can write is "I should have heeded to your warning"".
How can someone have such bad taste.
A slightly strange conclusion. You don't need to blame somebody or something to grieve. I understand the point of blame in the court case, but the author is talking about 'somebody must be to blame [for this loss in the prime of life]'. Blaming someone can make grieving easier, but that doesn't mean that there has to be blame.
Why a family decided to take their tragedy to a courtroom to force it upon others makes me upset though. And what this has to do with technology or startups is definitely beyond me. This should be on the fron page of Reddit, but HN? Why?