What Ralph Wiggum loops are missing(xr0am.substack.com)
xr0am.substack.com
What Ralph Wiggum loops are missing
https://xr0am.substack.com/p/what-ralph-wiggum-loops-are-missing
26 comments
Even funnier is ghuntley going around giving talks, posting on x etc saying “if you don’t learn this stuff you’re gonna be left behind”. I think this was around when he made the first Ralph blog post?
Which of course couldn’t be true. Any “prompt skill” is going to be commodified. Thats the entire premise AI companies are trying to sell.
Which of course couldn’t be true. Any “prompt skill” is going to be commodified. Thats the entire premise AI companies are trying to sell.
100% and what this does is just lock users further in a particular ecosystem like anthropic’s
ghuntley is a grifter, unfortunately
I am musing with the idea that other than dipping a toe in, investing a lot of time in this stuff is a waste (for this reason) and a better use is get deeper human domain experience in XYZ.
Agree, like I said in my other post reviewing what Jason Lemkin was doing with GTM: pick one tool, learn how to use it in real world scenarios, gain experience and you will be hyper employable.
It’s the application that matters imo
[deleted]
100% agree with this, tooling is no longer an advantage.
The only thing I say to myself on this, given how Ralph took months to be notice (and taskmaster is still flying somehow under the radar comparatively speaking), is that people are drowning with the volume of new features / tools. It’s what you do with these tools that matters at the end of the day and shift goes more on GTM, marketing etc. rather than uniqueness of software. Most important thing: find clients :) Anyway interesting times!
The only thing I say to myself on this, given how Ralph took months to be notice (and taskmaster is still flying somehow under the radar comparatively speaking), is that people are drowning with the volume of new features / tools. It’s what you do with these tools that matters at the end of the day and shift goes more on GTM, marketing etc. rather than uniqueness of software. Most important thing: find clients :) Anyway interesting times!
Ralph didn't take months to notice! It was just nothing novel, so it didn't get much attention. All of the frontier labs were already doing this.
> Without proper task sequencing, agents kept stepping on each other. Which leads to the obvious question: what exactly does each tool give you?
In Gas Town, they “agent their way out” - it has a different type of worker that merges work and if needed can creatively rewrite completed work to suit the new state of a fast moving codebase.
So- sometimes even folks who build agent tools miss chances to take themselves out of the loop! But it’s one of the most powerful ways to scale yourself.
In Gas Town, they “agent their way out” - it has a different type of worker that merges work and if needed can creatively rewrite completed work to suit the new state of a fast moving codebase.
So- sometimes even folks who build agent tools miss chances to take themselves out of the loop! But it’s one of the most powerful ways to scale yourself.
interesting, didnt know about gas town, will look into it more
Funny story from this craziness: Anthropic Legal forced a rename in the Claude repo to "Ralph Loop".
You can have a "Ralph Loop [that] implements the Ralph Wiggum technique" but you can't have a "Ralph Wiggum loop".
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/commit...
You can have a "Ralph Loop [that] implements the Ralph Wiggum technique" but you can't have a "Ralph Wiggum loop".
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/commit...
Once, long ago, I was a fledgling C programmer working on the TinyMUCK game server. My mentor had released the 2.0 version with MUF, and I had implemented the port to SunOS (where a dereferenced NULL pointer does not return 0, but SIGSEGV: that was a lot of fun to debug!)
Later on I was working with another fellow to kind of bring the codebase up-to-date, and we found it necessary to implement a new database dump format (the database was normally 100% in RAM and then "dumped out" to a flat file for checkpoints and shutdowns.)
So I made the database changes, and then I christened the format "Christina Applegate TinyMUCK Dump Format" because she was the girl/woman of my dreams at that point in time (prior to Melissa Joan Hart taking over).
It is unclear if she ever found out about this particular usage. But last time I checked, this codebase was still extant, and so, someone somewhere may still be running a TinyMUCK server that utilizes a unique format dedicated to Christina Applegate herself.
Later on I was working with another fellow to kind of bring the codebase up-to-date, and we found it necessary to implement a new database dump format (the database was normally 100% in RAM and then "dumped out" to a flat file for checkpoints and shutdowns.)
So I made the database changes, and then I christened the format "Christina Applegate TinyMUCK Dump Format" because she was the girl/woman of my dreams at that point in time (prior to Melissa Joan Hart taking over).
It is unclear if she ever found out about this particular usage. But last time I checked, this codebase was still extant, and so, someone somewhere may still be running a TinyMUCK server that utilizes a unique format dedicated to Christina Applegate herself.
Nice one !
Haha nice find ! also interestingly the loop they have via the plugin, is not really the concept intended since it doesn’t persist across sessions
What both Ralph Loops and Taskmaster miss: Vetted planning processes to ensure you thought through all the details that need to be in the tasks. Did the plans generated by the tools think through all the security, data modeling, performance gaps, and so many other checklists of considerations?
If it's not baked in, the AI may be skipping over it. You'd have no idea until you run into something ugly.
If it's not baked in, the AI may be skipping over it. You'd have no idea until you run into something ugly.
Yes agree that’s why my PRD gets vetted by another agent before I even start breaking it down. Takes all dimensions you mentioned. Happy to share more about this if other are interested
I've seen a fair number of obvious astro-turfing posts on reddit promoting task master. I assume this is just more of the same.
When people say Macs are a great computer, are they astro-turfing?
When they say "just switch from Windows to Linux", are they astro-turfing Linux?
When they say "just switch from Windows to Linux", are they astro-turfing Linux?
No affiliation with taskmaster, I am simply a user, happy for you to check my GitHub to see the usage
The “astro-turfing” term is new to me, what does that mean?
You're one of today's lucky 10k. (https://xkcd.com/1053/)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
The complexity aspect of the planning is one aspect I’d been missing. It fits nicely next to “list assumptions and then check them” and “finish one f#%^ing thing at a time” advice that I give to human teams which is also a struggle for agents.
Yes it’s really good because agents are great at unique goals, not so much when tasks touch too many sub goals
Both Ralph loops and Taskmaster are just sub-components of Gas Town (and soon Gas City).
Gas Country! Gas World! Gaslaxy!
> That’s usually how it goes. The practitioners find the patterns first. Then the patterns become features.
This is the scariest thing atm with the fast pacing of these things. As capabilities increase, everything you've spent time on building (w/ scaffolding, tooling, etc) gets "merged" into the all-you-can-prompt solution that the big labs provide. If your previous work has no differentiation, it's very hard to provide additional value / monetise it. And it's hard to know what will be differentiation or what will get eaten up.
It's that sci-fi story trope of the colony ship that gets overtaken by a new generation engine, and when they reach their planet they find a thriving colony there already. But with software :)