TL;DR: Start your instructions with Directives instead of Constraints/Restrictions. The most compliant ratio is below:
Directive — what to do. This goes first. It establishes the pattern you want in the generation path before the prohibited concept appears.
Context — why. Reasoning that reinforces the directive without mentioning the prohibited concept. “Real integration tests catch deployment failures” adds signal strength to the positive pattern. Be wary! Reasoning that mentions the prohibited concept doubles the violation rate.
Restriction — what not to do. This goes last. Negation provides weak suppression — but weak suppression is enough when the positive pattern is already dominant.
Directive — what to do. This goes first. It establishes the pattern you want in the generation path before the prohibited concept appears.
Context — why. Reasoning that reinforces the directive without mentioning the prohibited concept. “Real integration tests catch deployment failures” adds signal strength to the positive pattern. Be wary! Reasoning that mentions the prohibited concept doubles the violation rate.
Restriction — what not to do. This goes last. Negation provides weak suppression — but weak suppression is enough when the positive pattern is already dominant.