Google says 75% of its new code is AI written(blog.google)
blog.google
Google says 75% of its new code is AI written
https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/infrastructure-and-cloud/google-cloud/cloud-next-2026-sundar-pichai/
11 comments
"AI-generated and approved by engineers" is doing a lot of work there. If accepting a 4-character Gemini autocomplete counts, Copilot users hit >90% last year. The useful metric is % of functions where >50% of the body was AI-written before human edits. just my 2 cents
I saw this post at the exact same time I ran across this elsewhere: https://www.phonearena.com/news/pixel-6-7-8-9-10-battery-dra...
There's no way to definitively say they're cause and effect but also....
There's no way to definitively say they're cause and effect but also....
There is a big difference between just “vibe coding” without reviewing the code and actually knowing what you’re doing and checking everything the AI produces.
In my opinion, humans don’t really need to write code anymore. The main skill is steering AI models.
In my opinion, humans don’t really need to write code anymore. The main skill is steering AI models.
One possibility is that most of the code that matters is being written by hand, while enormous amounts of code are being generated for other things. People are being evaluated on their AI usage after all.
[deleted]
This is an ad:
Edit: it's slop. How did I not spot it was slop posted by the marketing department immediately? If they want engineers to pay any attention they will have to do better. Or maybe they are targeting engineers any more? blog.google used to be a reliable read.
Our engineers are orchestrating fully autonomous digital task forces, firing off agents and accomplishing incredible things.
Edit: it's slop. How did I not spot it was slop posted by the marketing department immediately? If they want engineers to pay any attention they will have to do better. Or maybe they are targeting engineers any more? blog.google used to be a reliable read.
> Who swallows this stuff?
> 75% of their code started life as the output of a model mind you, it just "forgets" to mention the subsequent hours of humans put into reviewing
> unverifiable claims
> blog.google used to be a reliable read
Relevant section:
"Today, 75% of all new code at Google is now AI-generated and approved by engineers, up from 50% last fall."
"Today, 75% of all new code at Google is now AI-generated and approved by engineers, up from 50% last fall."
Big tech is inflating the AI bubble.
Because of that, I find it hard to fully trust these kinds of claims — especially from complex systems like Google.