The Lindy effect in software(clemsau.com)
clemsau.com
The Lindy effect in software
https://www.clemsau.com/posts/the-lindy-effect-in-software/
14 comments
Terrific writing. Just terrific. Copied verbatim:
I'd say rust is the new Java, not Go.
Complete with rewriting everything in the trendy memory safe quasi-portable language that is faster than (poorly written) C in your personal microbenchmarks.
Complete with rewriting everything in the trendy memory safe quasi-portable language that is faster than (poorly written) C in your personal microbenchmarks.
I work in enterprise, and java still reigns supreme. You see some (very limited) cracks coming from other jvm languages, but that's all. Nobody talks about Rust, rarely about C.
Isn't .NET kinda on quite a rise in enterprise?
Which enterprise?
All the job postings I see are for C++ (Annoyingly. Fortran is better). Or Python obviously.
All the job postings I see are for C++ (Annoyingly. Fortran is better). Or Python obviously.
[deleted]
People have been rewriting software in better languages ever since there was more than one programming language. Eventually people will be rewriting Rust programs in GoombaLang or whatever. Isn't this what we want?
I don't think this is what we want. We want people to maintain and incrementally improve existing software and tooling and not rewrite and change things all the time.
A rewrite doesn't need to actually change the public API or experience using the software.
But by rewriting software, even in the same language we can learn from past mistakes and experiences and create better and more maintainable software.
But by rewriting software, even in the same language we can learn from past mistakes and experiences and create better and more maintainable software.
Sorry, I think the idea that rewrites are good way to achieve more maintenable software is basically always based on a delusion. It is a very common and well understood delusion for programmers who always see the existing code as crap and imagine a beautiful world when they could only rewrite it.
A well understood mistake: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-...
In the context of free software it is usually also a method to be able to sideline part of the existing user or developer community, which you can not easily justify when making changes the existing project but can be achieved with a rewrite. But the former leads to a honest view of the trade-offs and consequences where the rewrite is a toxic power move.
In the context of free software it is usually also a method to be able to sideline part of the existing user or developer community, which you can not easily justify when making changes the existing project but can be achieved with a rewrite. But the former leads to a honest view of the trade-offs and consequences where the rewrite is a toxic power move.
Huh? Rust is nothing like Java. Java is a dynamic type-erased garbage-collected managed abomination with FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition standard library.
Two words: Visual Basic.
(2023 - hopefully the post lasts another 100 years!)