I’m sorry but this comment is hysterical. I have experience with construction and engineering and I shudder to think what type of monstrosity you’ve built.
Although I believe that the war in Ukraine is unjust, I still do love Russia. They are an extreme people and that cuts both ways. If you learn even a little bit of their language and make friends with Russians you will see a glimpse of the Russian soul. It is a tragedy that they didn’t join NATO after the Cold War ended.
If what you are saying is true, then you would see exploit marketplaces list iOS exploits at hundreds of millions of dollars. Right now a cursory glance sets the price for zero click persistent exploit at $2m behind Android at $2.5m. Still high, and yes, higher than five years ago when it was around $1m for both, but still not "largely crushed". It is still easy to get into a phone if you are a state actor.
I love DigitalOcean to the point where I actually applied for a job there[0]. The UI is leagues better than AWS and there are really useful API endpoints to control common things. I've been a paying customer for something like 12 years and I've never had an issue.
I'm open to backend roles, including roles I've done before but haven't in a while like Data Science / Machine Learning. But I'm especially interested in a role where I could write technical blog posts for a company like DigitalOcean. I've been a partner at a small company before and I've been a CTO before, so if you have a small scrappy startup and you're looking for someone to hire juniors and to read through Pull Requests, I'm your man.
I upvoted you even though we presently disagree because you bring an honest perspective to the discussion.
The main reason I was drawn to the Catholic Church was that I believed in transubstantiation, or at least the real presence. I was drawn to the history of the Church and through prayer and conversations as well as a supernatural event as well as a dream I prayed for, I finally came to accept that praying with saints was not worshiping them. All prayers with saints go directly to God, but sometimes having someone intercede for you, as Mary did at the wedding feast at Cana, helps you with God.
If you have an open mind to switching churches, I recommend the following:
1. Pray to God to guide you to the right Church. I believe that he may be guiding some people to the Catholic Church, others to the Orthodox Church, and some to Protestant churches. Or He may have a real preference. I'm not sure, but I tried pretty hard to figure out where to go and I ended up in the Catholic Church.
2. Take the core issues that are show stoppers for you and research (and pray) them from the other perspective. Like I did with prayer with saints.
3. If you are feeling to be led to a certain church, get the full catechism of that church and read through it. I was shocked at how little I disagreed with the Catholic Church's catechism. It gave me confidence that I was truly being led to Catholicism.
4. Talk to Christians that you look up to. This is what I did with prayer with saints. There was a Christian uncle of mine (not blood, married in) that I was just completely sure that he was a real Christian and he was a Catholic. He explained it to me in ways that made sense and he answered any of my questions. I ended up adopting his middle name Jacques. Which leads to the funny sounding name Zach Jacques Aysan.
I’ve had a wild life. I was a Protestant for over thirty years and I became a Catholic around two years ago. I’ve had more than a few demons attack me and two confirmed good spirits, probably angels. The test for spirits is to get them to agree that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. It’s sometimes difficult to understand them, but anyway I really believe the Bible and supernatural stuff. If anyone on here wants to reach out my email is in my profile.
1. I didn't see any obvious AI ticks in the article.
2. If you want to claim that some slop is AI then please bring reasons. Even if they are the stuff of "there is too many em-dashes" then fine at least you brought something.
I remember the first bubble. It was absolutely huge. This is nothing compared to that. This is a bit frothy, but given the difference between AGI and human intelligences it is at least understandable. If AI can replace most workers then we should expect to see sky high valuations. That is a big if but it is at least conceivable.
Have you tried going to a church or a country club or a bar? There is also a find friends option on most dating apps. I really wish that you’d find at least one friend. If you’re in Toronto I could meet up with you at a cafe or a pub.
I'm sorry but only at my most very dedicated periods of work did I work 100 hour weeks, and that was like 3 or 4 weeks tops. I highly doubt that anyone sustains a 100 hour work week for much longer. Eighty hour work weeks? Sure, that is doable, but sleeping at the job site because you are pulling a 100 hour work week is just not sustainable.
Governments need privacy. They literally investigate child mollestation cases. They hunt spies. They handle all sorts of messy things like divorce between couples with abuse.
I'm not commenting on the government coming in at unveiling encrypted communications, but certainly a better approach than "governments should be transparent and the people should be opaque" would be "governments should be translucent and the people should be translucent too".
Honestly, as a former government contractor at a couple different places, this is pretty good bang for the buck. The planning meetings alone were probably $12m.
Also, ArriveCan was frequently mentioned by many in the protests around covid.
From my end: I dislike near-mandatory apps by governments, but I felt like Covid was an exceptional time and at least it is non-mandatory now at the boarder.
When I get to a new database and don't even know what data is stored where I don't write a test first. I write a bunch of SQL scripts and then maybe take it into a python toolkit for stats stuff. When training a classifier and having to choose things like dimensionality I find that exploring what the dimensions actually express teaches me more about the dataset and the approach faster than starting with a test. Sometimes I don't even know what opportunities are in the data that I'm going through, so how would I even express the test?
That said, I'll try it your way next time and see how it goes. If it works for you maybe I'll learn how to make it work for me, since I love TDD.
As for knowing exactly what you need upfront, why start coding? Why not do TDD? I find the interfaces are more naturally expressed as the consumer than the implementer.
I rarely find myself writing unnatural interfaces when starting with the test, and by starting with the test it makes abstractions that must be faked / mocked easier to slide into the code that implements the feature without too much damage to the rest of the codebase. I avoid them whenever possible, but sometimes a network call must be mocked and it's better to do so with minimal collateral damage.
My view is that TDD is great for non-explorative coding. So data science -> way less TDD. Web APIs -> almost always TDD.
That said, one of the things I think the vast majority of the leans anti-TDD crowd misses is that someone else on the team is picking up the slack for you and you never really appreciated it. I've joined too many teams, even great ones, where I needed to make a change to an endpoint and there were no functional or integration tests against it. So now I'm the one that is writing the tests you should have written. I'm the one that has to figure out how the code should work, and I'm the one that puts it all together in a new test for all of your existing functionality before I can even get started.
Had you written them in the first place I would have had a nice integration test that documents the intended behaviour and guards against regressions.
Basically I'm carrying water for you and the rest of the team that has little to do with my feature.
Now there are some devs out there that don't need TDD to remember to write tests, but I don't know many of them and they're usually writing really weird stuff (high performance or video or whatever).
But I have stopped concerning myself with changing other peoples minds on this. Some people have just naturally reactive minds and TDD isn't what they like so they don't do it.
Yep. I used to love Yaml back in the day. But two things burned me.
1. Significant whitespace in a data storage file doesn't scale. Yes, eventually someone wants to dump a giant graph of data and the library breaks.
2. Intermixed context on quoteless strings. Intermixing code and data doesn't work reliably. Every where I see it tried I see it break. If you don't want quotes on your strings, then you have to put something on your keywords. A simple @no would have stopped this and other situations.
As an aside, I find it stupid to have multiple names for true, false, and null.