As long as he didn't broken any law, and he didn't regret what he did, why someone would say he did anything wrong?
You may think, he earn his money in the US soil and he should contribute back to the US people. Morally correct. However, if that means he have to fund the US government by paying tax and portion of that money eventually used for launching a war in the middle east, I also think legally avoiding tax to the government is morally correct.
Try to think it is a parable: A flaw system (Texas court) exists today, and that kills people. So if you make a system today in good faith (e.g. a web or whatsoever) but didn't rule out all the flaws (which is hard), it can kill someday too.
Don't you know that? Terrorists did a great job in 2001! Since then, every one in United States are in terror, especially the US government. They did everything they believed to fight it, spend every penny they have, and torture every citizen of them whenever they are flying. If I were the terrorist I would be much glad: I don't need to do anything anymore but the whole US is in terror, forever!
As a final year E.E. Ph.D. student, I want my five years back.
For some reason, I found many professors in US are doing systems. That is something you can do, and can do better in the industry. Competing with the industry in a disadvantageous position is no fun. Before I was admitted to the Ph.D. program, I dreamed of exploring the science for the sake of pushing the human knowledge forward, but I can hardly see anyone in my neighbourhood is doing that. They are just pushing their publication count forward. That's it. It depends on the school culture, maybe. But I see this as a norm.
It is $22 Billion today's dollar from the 16th Century. Today's dollar and 16th century's dollar is totally different in value! The fed should be blamed.
I am interested to know why they have the problem only this year? They are not using the same algorithm before? Or they just discovered the problem now but can't do anything to the previous lottery winners?
Totally agree. An 18 month old can be classified as a "terrible-two" already. This monster can draw all your attention. If you're at home typing a email, you need to do it in 2-3 installments. Thus a nanny or something to keep it away from you (even just in the next room) while you're at work is an absolute necessary.
Imagine if you can control Cisco and Juniper device with the same command. It make sense for you to be oblivious of the device's make and model. Same command, same effect. What's more is that, by saying your device is in OpenFlow version X, you can assume it can do this and that. This is unlike your Cisco box: same device, different IOS options, different capabilities.