Does this LLM benchmark have any actual credibility? I get why they chose to not publish the actual tests but I find it highly dubious that there are only 15 tests and Gemini 3 Flash performs best.
First off, kudos and congrats on the launch, seems like a fun idea! I am curious, as you mentioned reverse engineering. How difficult was it to retrieve the raw gyroscope data from the AirPods - AFAIK there is no API to access this information, right?
Fun experiment. Main limitation I see is the delay between actions and commentary because of the whole script generation & TTS overhead. It seems like the commentary can quickly fall behind, especially in fast-paced sports.
Kudos for building something new, fresh & exploring, experimenting.
I don't see a scenario where this would be useful. It reminds me of exploded-view drawing but I don't see this being useful for textual content. Do you have an explicit use case? The example page, to me, looks very cluttered, overwhelming and IMO aesthetically unpleasing when reading on a mobile device.
Eh, I think it's a neat idea. No one's forced to use or buy this - as is the case with any offered service. Also, the 'qualified human being' in the end is still the tattoo artist who's actually doing the tattoo in this use case.
I assume most people who would use this won't just get a 1:1 copy tattoo of an AI generated result, the artist can still reiterate and use the designs as a draft or inspiration.
I understand the frustration shared in this post but I wholeheartedly disagree with the overall sentiment that comes with it.
The web isn't dead, (Gen)AI, SEO, spam and pollution didn't kill anything.
The world is chaotic and net entropy (degree of disorder) of any isolated or closed system will always increase. Same goes for the web. We just have to embrace it and overcome the challenges that come with it.