My git pre-commits are usually calling other executables or other tools, so I'm not quite sure how much it matters how fast is the git pre-commit tool. Can we have a benchmark of a normal use case of how much time are we saving with this new tool?
I'm actually planning to buy one too.
I agree with most of the comments about 120Hz refresh,
But I disagree about 4k (not enough content) and this is more personal my last monitor was 32" and it was a huge pain to travel with and I don't have a mansion to be far away from the monitor... so I think I'm aiming this time for 24".
I only use Firefox, I haven't open Chrome in months... But I try to stay away from Google most of the time, so probably not the best.
And as some other people it's better Firefox on Android than the app. I don't have to deal with adds on Firefox, the official app always have 2 or 4 adds waiting for the next video
blows my mind that in 2023 PIP still exists as it is, having in other languages good examples like: npm, composer, maver, cargo, yarn, etc.. which works like a charm since several years and most of the community are happy with them (No one is happy with PIP let's be honest)
Yo creo que deberiamos dejar de usar el ingles, si no cuando china empiece a dominar en temas tecnologicos, vamos tambien a aprender chino?