HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

TheProbes

no profile record

comments

TheProbes
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I`ve talked to blockchain bro`s since day one about this stuff. "Houses as NFTs" etc etc. It`s a simple grift, an empty scam, substituting a woo-woo-tech "solution" to obscure the fact that the basic idea is houses as bearer bonds.

Transfer the NFT? O.k, what happens if the wrong NFT is transferred and the person refuses to give it back?

What happens if someone hacks your wallet and steals your apes and your house. Do you have to move out?

What happens if the wrong data gets entered and an apartment block has one less floor of apartments than actually exists?

What is your blockchain solution to the boring everyday errors and fraud that occur in real life?

Here`s the problem. My shiftless nephew put a key logger on my computer and transferred my house NFT to his own wallet. Now he`s claiming I gave it to him and is aiming to sell it. Walk me through the process resolving this, step by step. .
TheProbes
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
There's no such thing as a room temperature super-conducting magnet. You are talking about "high temperature" magnets, which are YBCO tape magnets. High temperature, in this case, means about -290 degrees F.

The next breakthrough that will come will be YBCO powder-in-tube wires, that will allow much stronger fields than currently. They'll be here within a decade, probably much less, as working prototypes exist now.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The "Torygraph"? This newspaper has always been shrill semi-Fox News tripe.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Yeah, he's on some kind of messed up head trip, that's for sure. Osaka here.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
This article was from almost two years ago when the pandemic wasn't even going properly.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Your contention is that masks don't work, and Japanese people don't wear them? I travel the loop line to and from work during rush hour each day, and yeah, while I don't canvas every single person, to my mind, I don't see anyone not masked up and wearing it correctly.

On my way today actually, remembering your goofy statements, I kept a special eye out, just for you. Carriages stuffed full of people, lines and lines on the platforms, train doors opening and waves of people pouring out to change trains, little groups of elementary schoolkids walking together to school....I didn't see a single person today (bar a couple of dudes with their masks down while they smoked outside Lawsons) not masked. You just don't see people not fully masked up. Day in, day out. Sorry if I don't keep a little tally counter on me.

"You're doing it too." What does this even mean? I drink within a closed circle of friends or family in a bar with separated tables and screens up. The staff all wear masks. Life goes on, but because of the masks and distancing measures, the transmission rates remain low.

You have an incoherent world-view and grasp of logic. Are you incapable of understanding that there is a sliding scale of masking behaviour? With Japan at one end, and the dolts screaming about mandates in street protests at the other?

Again, I say, don't listen to this guy. Wear a mask (properly). Get vaccinated. (Is that punctuation more to your liking?)
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Yeah, this is an example of what I'm talking about. I'll get on the train this morning and ride to work and probably see 100,000 people, none of whom are unmasked or wearing "chin masks". I'll work all day and not see a single one of my co-workers faces. Same thing on the way home. Then, because it's Friday, I'll go out for drinks with my wife or maybe the same friends I usually see because we aren't in lockdown, and spend a couple of hours in a bar unmasked. Maybe I'll post a photo of myself having a beer?

Yet you have some friends on Instagram who post when they're out, and have seen some news reports (probably of the variety of "Japan's COVID mystery, why are their numbers so low?") where they hunt out some drongos in some dodgy tachinomya who aren't wearing masks for their story about how Japanese people aren't wearing masks either, and because it fits into your worldview, you'll glom onto that and post some non-peer reviewed rubbish that confirms your fervent wish that you shouldn't be in any way inconvenienced.

Oh look at that, I just saw the morning news. 115 new cases of COVID today in a country of 120 million during the Delta wave. It's a mystery I tell you. A complete mystery.

Don't listen to this guy, wear a mask, get vaccinated.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I live in Japan and everyone here wears a mask, but more importantly, wears them properly. Many Japanese people are already attuned to wearing them during flu season, and everyone wears them if they think they are getting a cold so it's no big deal for everyone to wear them the whole time, kids included. I'm not Japanese, but I get with the program and after a while, you don't notice it.

Masks are, of course, effective. Again, if you wear them properly and constantly, and everyone wears them.

The people who DON'T want to wear them and who wish to make it a political act will dredge up all sorts of B.S studies and data showing that "mandates" don't work and therefore extrapolate from that that masks themselves don't work, when any examination of the scene will show 60% of people wearing them 60% of the time, noses hanging out, lifting them up to talk, only putting them on when they've taken a few steps into the shop etc etc.

Masks work. If you wish to be honest about it, you'd say "They work, but we can't get our citizens to wear them."
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Because....because.....well....because THEN I COULDN'T SHILL YOU A CRYPTO TOKEN. There. I said it.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I'm not that au fait with the other cases you mention, but Helium is a straight up scam. No-one uses it for anything at all, even in markets where they have full coverage. This is because, in the real world, companies need security. They will pay a little bit extra so that: A: The network works everywhere, and doesn't suddenly develop dead spots because Jason went scuba diving for a week and turned off his node and B: There is someone on the end of the phone they can call when things go wrong.

No-one beyond those trying to make money of their tokens cares about Helium at all, easily provable by looking at their data record. "Oh....but LIME scooters!" No, they ripped off Lime's logo and are BSing that Lime uses their network. Lime doesn't. Lime uses a non-blockchain network called Twillio, because they are a real business in the real world need the things I mentioned above. https://customers.twilio.com/2050/lime/

Helium's only business, like every blockchain business that I have ever seen, is scamming people to buy tokens and selling them hardware. Oh, and lying.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I think that the main problem with this logic is that Bittorrent is a tech designed to illegally distribute a consumer good, ie a movie. Once the movie has made it's final stop, your eyeballs, that's it. It's been consumed. Cryptocurrency only has value if you can sell it on to someone else, and it's value is entirely dependent on what value you think you will be able to sell it for.

Once the number starts to go down as fiat on/off ramps start to get squeezed, it will be come much much less attractive to everyone, including, and maybe especially, to criminals. It only have value to them currently because they can store value in it and exchange it for fiat with non-criminals. If it becomes criminalized everywhere, and their only option is exchanging it with other criminals......well. It's not the same as Bittorrent is it?
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I think that the main problem with this logic is that Bittorrent is a tech designed to illegally distribute a consumer good, ie a movie. Once the movie has made it's final stop, your eyeballs, that's it. It's been consumed.

Cryptocurrency only has value if you can sell it on to someone else, and it's value is entirely dependent on what value you think you will be able to sell it for.

Once the number starts to go down as fiat on/off ramps start to get squeezed, it will be come much much less attractive to everyone, including, and maybe especially, to criminals. It only have value to them currently because they can store value in it and exchange it for fiat with non-criminals. If it becomes criminalized everywhere, and their only option is exchanging it with other criminals......well. It's not the same as Bittorrent is it?
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
You should be getting some of them back soon then right?
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
No, you are correct. You could do it the way you claim. Build in workarounds, try and get everyone to use less efficient tech, try and fix problems of errors and fraud, but I don't think it ever will happen. It's not going to replace a database? So why do we need it?

Centralized control will always be faster and more efficient and less fragile. Errors can be fixed, fraud can be blocked. Fans of blockchain would be a lot less certain that the tech had value if they were unable to shill a token.

Why isn't Apple jumping in to use them? They could set up their own blockchain right? Well, because the central issuing authority doesn't want to lose control of them. Why aren't ticket resales on the blockchain? Because the central issuing authority doesn't want to lose control of them. And that's what you will run into, every time.

All the things you claim that will be able to be done with the blockchain can already be done. So yeah, I guess we'll wait and see.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The goal of drugs is to do the drugs. They are consumer goods. You buy them, then consume them. Crypto has no value unless you can sell it on to someone else, and that's it's ONLY value. That is the glaring difference, and it's weakness.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The problem with this sort of reasoning is that it conflates an e.mail or a downloaded movie (or a bag of cocaine) with a cryptocurrency or token. E.mails/movies/dope etc are all basically consumer goods. Read the e.mail, wipe it. Put the coke up your nose, watch the movie.

It only has to go as far as the person you are sending it to, and it's journey is finished, and it's value is realised. Crypto is entirely different in that it has no value unless you can sell it on to another person. That final step is it's weak point.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
1: I understand perfectly how they work. I'll say it again. It's YOU who seem to have a hazy understanding of the real world and the tech you think is so great.

Universities have public facing databases where someone can just type in a name and birthday and see the degree conferred. You seem to think they would swap their current centralized database for a blockchain? Why? Firstly, they've always had the option of using an append only ledger. They aren't new. They don't though because you CAN'T SEARCH THEM. If you want to search, you have to go through each block sequentially, checking every single entry. That's the basic property of blockchains. So.....what happens if you want to search for Engineering degrees conferred to out of state students between 1990-2005? It takes forever. But you think they're going to drop their centralized database for the smoking dumpster fire that is blockchain? Databases are for ORGANISING DATA. How does a blockchain work? Well, when you get some new data, you stick it on the end. Great.

2: See #1.

3: No company will put in a whole bunch of work to allow a customer of one of their competitors to carry a bunch of "assets" into their sandbox. It's able to be done now, but have you ever seen Linden dollars being allowed in WOW or vice versa? Ever??

4: Yeah, I have one thing to say to that. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/09/apple-announces-first... Wow, how about that? They didn't take advantage of the amaaaaaaaazing technology of the blockchain? Why not I wonder? Especially as how I'm sure a million crypto bros were pitching to them. Oh yeah, that's right. You can't search the database. See #1.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
1: It doesn't prove it. The only thing it proves is that you have the NFT. The only way to prove you have the degree is to contact the central authority, thereby invalidating the need for the blockchain entirely.

2: All your examples can be done easily without blockchain. Perks, discounts, coupons, tickets etc. We already do all of this just fine.

3: "They wouldn't". Lol. Why not? It takes them zero effort, it would be an automated system, and guess what, it totally destroys your whole assertation. Doesn't it? GameX would check with Blizzard for reason that Blizzard would also check with GameX.

4: Ownership with NFTs is entirely unenforceable. Contrary to your point, you are the one who actually doesn't understand NFTs, nor the real world it seems. You seem to want to turn everything into a bearer bond, when in fact nothing in real life will ever work that way.

ID's? Ok, you have some ID token that "proves" you are 21. Does that mean you are 21? No, the only thing it proves is that you have the token. In any consequential case, the entity wanting to verify your age would have to check back with a central authority to determine if it's valid or not, thereby invalidating the need for the blockchain.

Tickets? You somehow think any ticketing agency on earth will hard over all control to what happens to the tickets they have sold?

Coupons? You've seen all the legalese and prohibitions written on coupons I take it. There are more rules about what you can and can't do with a 10% Off Pizza Hut token than many contracts. Yet you think they'll start putting them on the blockchain?

You live in fantasy-land mate. No game company is going to devote a whole bunch of effort and programming time into allowing someone with assets from a competitor to use them in their game.
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
As a crypto-punk owner myself, I feel that that NFTs are the future. Look at this baby. 250k. https://openpuddle.io/?id=328wfloxyf
TheProbes
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
That's your example? A sword in a video game? Honestly though, I guess it makes sense, because NFTs are arse for anything that has actual real life meaning. Even you, yourself, realised that halfway through your post. Yeah, no shit your degree is worthless if the university says it's worthless.

So, on to video games. You think it would work that way huh? Your sword would still be worth something if Blizzard revoked it because you "own" it? You are making the mistake of thinking that whatever game you want to use the sword in wouldn't check with Blizzard to find out if you are a douchebag who has been banned or not, before they allowed you to use the sword for something in their game. They'd check, see that Blizzard has no record of it on their database, then decide that you'd either been banned or had stolen it, then block you.

Btw: Even this won't happen. Read what an actual game developer says about it. https://docseuss.medium.com/look-what-you-made-me-do-a-lot-o...