Privatization is clearly not a solution I have seen what it did in housing in Germany and for the locomotives in the UK it is fairly clear firms can be worse or just as bad
> They want to control the lives of people and impose violence on people who are against this
Considering there is only one party that wanted and actively wants to destroy people’s lives for not locking the boot and accepting mandates of big pharma…
DO you unironically quite believe that this people do not believe in what they do?
Do you think that medicine is a nothing or all kind of thing?
DO you believe that those who do not trust big companies that have paid millions in criminal fines, reject the rest of medicine?
You are simply not Supposed to "believe" in science that is reedit tier thinking, Science is a process and in such process mistrusting leaky vaccines that reduce T cells amounts is ok.
Medical Science is not monolithic.
Greetings,
I am a recently graduated Computer Science student in Canada and I would like to know if you have any positions that can be done remotely. I am a native Spanish speaker, and I also speak English and French to proficient levels. I have experience with some of the things mentioned in the post, however I did not find anything along my profile, in your page, is there an email where I can send my resume, so you guys can check if I fit any role in your organization?
It is a Masonic society that actually pretends to give freedom to their sheep but is nothing more than an ilusión they merely choose which door to use when they go to the slaughterhouse
Lab leaks are not rare the actual thing is that lab leaks that turn into pandemics are an anomaly but only because pandemics are an anomaly statistically speaking
Not only that but anyone that has used social media can say that to you, specially younger people.
Meanwhile studies show there was no correlation between violence and videogames. And except for lag you can't really find a lot of people that will tell you videogames made them violent.
(https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/o...)
considering that this doesnt work for more than start ups and small businesses it makes sense, specially considering a lot of those start ups just vanish before anyone can cash in.
Nah the hegemony doesn’t support the people that dissent from it so the social engineers will try to seem like they care about their employees, but at the end of the day the only will help those who abet their hatred for life
Why did this get flagged honestly while I do not agree and while I was expecting a different thing given the title, it makes a bunch of good points and I say this as a Hispanic guy in an industry that does not look like him usually. Are long gone the days of actually hacking nuanced discussions of complex topics in hackernews?
Yellen is just evil the amendment is just made to avoid asking programmers and service providers that are not brokers, from having their privacy violated. There are good senators from both sides that are trying to stop this madness that would affect a lot of people , as this would avoid having to give client information if you are not a broker, but Biden and Yellen seem to have taken their mask off and it is obvious that they want no privacy in the crypto ecosystem, even for people that are clearly only doing legal things.
"Without systems that promote quality, non-ideological, nuanced, original, tolerant dialogue we will keep running into the false dilemma of unmoderated cess pools or heavy handed moderation."
Hey you might not have the actual same definition of ideology I have but I think that most people would find "non-ideological" debate basically an impossibility, we can hide ideology with a certain kind of "politeness" if you might but considering what we know about language and how words themselves are loaded I dont even think it is possible to have that kind of debate. I am trying to think the last couple debates I have had both casually and on a more direct setting, and it is impossible for me to see those debates as something that could have been non ideological