EDIT#2: IT'S BECAUSE POWERFUL MEN KNOW THAT REAL POWER IS ABOUT CONTROLLING ACCESS TO PUSSY. (ESPECIALLY ATTRACTIVE PUSSY.) MOST OF YOU DUMB CUCKS DON'T REALIZE THAT, AND I'VE BEEN SHADOWBANNED FOR SAYING IT, BUT IT'S SO TRUE THAT IT HURTS THE BALLS TO CONSIDER.
Some of the most competent people I've ever worked with have been women, but let's not pretend that _every_ woman is hired solely because she's competent.
The author will either have to forgive some men for thinking she's that kind of girl, or nurse that indignation until it destroys her.
You can't inadvertently shill if you keep your mouth shut, you can't be misconstrued as consenting if you don't hashtag.
Maybe it's time to think about how unnatural it is for us to be sharing this much of our lives online, instead of complaining about corporations doing what corporations do, which is overstep the bounds of good taste and sanity in the name of making another buck.
>Regulator's aren't stupid enough to be fooled by a couple of junior engineers being offered up as a sacrifice. They'll definitely go after the highest-level people they can get.
Maybe in a just world. I don't hold out too much hope.
>Can anyone understand the logic of the NYT releasing this article, then going into the wage gap aspect, without mentioning that the data can't be quantified by major?
It fits a narrative that NYT has been pushing for years.
EDIT: IF UR MAD BRO, I KNO SOME GOOD SURGEONS.
EDIT#2: IT'S BECAUSE POWERFUL MEN KNOW THAT REAL POWER IS ABOUT CONTROLLING ACCESS TO PUSSY. (ESPECIALLY ATTRACTIVE PUSSY.) MOST OF YOU DUMB CUCKS DON'T REALIZE THAT, AND I'VE BEEN SHADOWBANNED FOR SAYING IT, BUT IT'S SO TRUE THAT IT HURTS THE BALLS TO CONSIDER.