HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Transrapid

no profile record

comments

Transrapid
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I read so much wrong information about FCEVs here. Or are there also bots from Elon on the road here?
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Every car manufacturer, even in the USA, harms people with their cars. Even a battery car emits particulate matter. If you really want to put something sensible on the road, it's the FCEV. That frees the air from particulate matter.
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Wrong. have a look here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibo5fN727Rg
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
what? no!
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
> Hydrogen will always leak from any container.

not anymore

> Clean hydrogen is difficult to make, giving an opportunity to the oil industry to easily make cheap hydrogen from refineries, which is not carbon neutral.

It's not and everybody is talking about GREEN hydrogen

> I'm not sure there is enough platinum in the world to make all those cars. Mining platinum might cause additional carbon emissions.

you don't need it to create fuel cells

> Hydrogen is very dangerous because it's highly explosive. Gas is safer in that regard.

Nope industry is using it since decades
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
>The efficiency compared to battery tech is horrendous.

nope

>Hydrogen is effectively a storage technology -- we have to generate it and compress it. Which combined with the above means that charging a hydrogen car will always be more expensive than putting the same amount of usable energy into a battery powered car.

Nope, 350kw charger -> loss

>Let's not forget that the cheapest way of generating hydrogen is from fossil fuels. Electrolysis is very inefficient.

no, newest one >95%

>Any concern there might exist for the effect on the electrical grid coming battery powered cars multiplies for hydrogen due to the inefficiency.

Nope you get more energy with less area used via pipeline than grid lines

> In the end, a hydrogen car is ultimately electric. What is more convenient, having a car that can be plugged into an outlet, or a car that needs an extremely specialized hydrogen station?

home hydrogen station exist

> IMO the only excitement from hydrogen is for fossil fuel companies, because that's what the vast majority of it is made from, and because it'd be a fairly natural fit into their existing infrastructure.

wrong fossil fuel companies still want to sell fossil fuels. we have to deal with emission inside cities. hydrogen cars cleaning the air while driving. battery cars still emit emissions.
Transrapid
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Yeah Germany, Japan, South Korea, UK, China, Australia, France, India, California and so on seeing it as the future of cars.

"It is generally considered more ecological than electric, because of much lesser environmental footprint than required for producing batteries. Another advantage would be bigger driving range and faster refuelling."

And the biggest advantage: you're cleaning the air while driving from particles which harm your health. <- This reason alone is a key factor. Have a look here: https://youtu.be/ormfLJmWGC8

People complained about the emission cheating regarding volkswagen. So everybody who did has to be pro hydrogen car. Because its real emission free. not like a battery car